Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,182 posts)
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:09 PM Mar 2016

If King Kong had just destroyed Carl Denham's theater and nothing else, I would say.....

....that would have been a good outcome to the story.

Of course, monsters rarely manage to contain the damage they inflict to just those who justifiably deserve it.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If King Kong had just destroyed Carl Denham's theater and nothing else, I would say..... (Original Post) Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2016 OP
1933 King Kong was a bastard ProudToBeBlueInRhody Mar 2016 #1
Given he was taken from his exboyfil Mar 2016 #2
Yeah, but that lady was minding her own business sleeping in her apartment or hotel room. ProudToBeBlueInRhody Mar 2016 #3
After reviewing the film exboyfil Mar 2016 #4
There were also a lot of folks on a elevated traincar ProudToBeBlueInRhody Mar 2016 #5
Don't mention the Jessica Lange/Jeff Bridges movie. After Peter Jackon's remake, it's dead to me. randome Mar 2016 #6
Don't know why.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Mar 2016 #8
Andy Serkis rules! spiderpig Mar 2016 #10
1933 Kong was pretty much a brute. Downtown Hound Mar 2016 #7
Kong was just protecting his homeland from invaders when he killed the sailors, tabasco Mar 2016 #9

exboyfil

(17,863 posts)
2. Given he was taken from his
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:16 PM
Mar 2016

home, put in chains and then on public display. The public in vast numbers came to see this captured animal.

I think he is entitled to a little payback.

I don't know who they cheered for in the 1930s, but when I watched it with my daughter, we definitely were on Kong's side.

Kind of like the bull that jumped out of the bull ring.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
3. Yeah, but that lady was minding her own business sleeping in her apartment or hotel room.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:19 PM
Mar 2016

He was stalking Fay Wray, saw it wasn't her and dropped her to her death.

He's a creep.

exboyfil

(17,863 posts)
4. After reviewing the film
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:35 PM
Mar 2016

she might have been about the only innocent one in the city. Everyone else is partying and enjoying Kong.

You are right about the woman.

Can't say I have a lot of sympathy for Ann Darrow (Fay Wray). She was part of the group that took him from the island, and saw nothing wrong with exploiting him in front of the masses.

The that should have gotten dropped was Denham.

A Philip Jose Farmer story explores Kong's motivations in greater detail.

"After King Kong Fell"

https://www.reddit.com/r/printSF/comments/3hwc71/after_king_kong_fell_philip_jose_farmer/

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
5. There were also a lot of folks on a elevated traincar
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:37 PM
Mar 2016

I suspect they were simply going to or from work, with not enough money to view or care about Kong.

Ann Darrow as a character changed over the three films....first movie, Fay, she was legit frightened. Jessica Lange was a bit spunkier but did care for him being able to live his life after Jeff Bridges (Jack) talked to her about it. Naomi Watts was flat out horny for Kong and in the end, boy, she looked at Adrien Brody and was like "Ugh, this guy?".

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
6. Don't mention the Jessica Lange/Jeff Bridges movie. After Peter Jackon's remake, it's dead to me.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:52 PM
Mar 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]"If you're bored then you're boring." -Harvey Danger[/center][/font][hr]

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
8. Don't know why....
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:09 PM
Mar 2016

...you'd dislike a film after a newer CGI'd up version came out. The '76 version of King Kong is nowhere near the original IMHO, but I liked it better than the Jackson version which I felt was like watching a moving painting.

Downtown Hound

(12,618 posts)
7. 1933 Kong was pretty much a brute.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:54 PM
Mar 2016

And I actually don't think he was ever really meant to be sympathetic until the very end when he's being gunned down by airplanes. Even prior to be taken from the island he kills a number of people that didn't really deserve it. The sailors on the log come to mind. Not to mention he regularly kidnaps a sacrificed girl from the village and I'm guessing since he regularly needs new ones, they don't survive for very long.

Exploiting Kong for profit was wrong. But that doesn't make Kong innocent either. Granted he was an animal and not a person, but quite a viscous animal at that.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
9. Kong was just protecting his homeland from invaders when he killed the sailors,
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:15 PM
Mar 2016

and who's to say he didn't have a very nice harem set up somewhere on the island, where all the island girls lived, that he had for a long time, and some of the harem members simply died of old age and needed replaced.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If King Kong had just des...