General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDaily Kos Asks Its Community To Moderate Criticisms Of Hillary Clinton Or Face Banishment From Site
Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton may still be duking it out on the campaign trail, but at least one major progressive blog and activism site is already preparing for the general election.
Markos Kos Moulitsas, founder of the Daily Kos, a popular liberal web site, wrote a blogpost on Friday asking the sites community of writers, readers and commenters to begin moderating their criticism of Clinton starting on March 15, in the likely event that Clinton solidifies her hold on the nomination with additional primary wins.
If Sanders does not turn the tide, Moulitsas wrote, then on March 15 this site officially transitions to General Election footing. That means, we will focus our attention not just on Donald Trump or his rivals, but also on the Senate, the House, and state-level races.
If you want the most liberal government possible, we arent going to get that this cycle in the White House, but we can keep building the bench down the ballot so that come 2024, we have lots of great liberals to choose from, Moulitsas added
more at link: http://theintellectualist.co/daily-kos-asks-its-community-to-moderate-criticisms-of-hillary-clinton-or-face-banishment-from-site/
msongs
(67,420 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)And they will be Bernie fans.
I think KOS is making a big mistake. Limiting free speech is not too wise.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)nxylas
(6,440 posts)I expect similar purges to start here too. If they have any sense, Kos refugees will head somewhere a little more...radical.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)I will no longer tolerate malicious attacks on our presumptive presidential nominee or our presidential efforts. What does that mean?
No attacks on Hillary Clinton using right-wing tropes of sources. Shes had 30 years of bullshit flung at her from the Right, theres no need to have Daily Kos give them an assist.
Constructive criticism from the Left is allowed. Theres a difference between constructive and destructive criticism. Do I need to spell it out? Its the difference between We need to put pressure on her to do the right thing on TPP versus shes a sell-out corporatist whore oligarch. In general, if youre resorting to cheap sloganeering like oligarch or warmonger or neocon, you might want to reframe your argument in a more substantive, issue-focused and constructive matter. Again, Im not interested in furthering the Rights hate-fueled media machine. If thats what you want, might I suggest Free Republic?
Saying you wont vote, or will vote for Trump, or will vote for Jill Stein (or another Third Party) is not allowed. If thats how you feel, but have other places in which you can be constructive on the site, then keep your presidential feelings to yourself. Those of us who care about our country and its future are focused on victory. If you arent, then its a big internet, I suggest you find more hospitable grounds for your huffing, puffing, and stomping of feet.
http://m.dailykos.com/stories/2016/3/4/1495813/-March-15-and-Daily-Kos-transition-to-General-Election-footing
I'm looking forward to seeing the end of the "warmongering oligarch" type stuff here on DU, too.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)MH1
(17,600 posts)I would prefer Bernie Sanders as president. But I find the constant bashing from both sides of their non-preferred candidate to be extremely tiresome and potentially damaging.
In theory it's still possible for Bernie to pull it out, but it is increasingly unrealistic. The math just doesn't work.
But ok, you disagree. When do you think would be the right time? Only when the convention is held? Or when the delegate math becomes incontrovertible?
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Seems some people are upset with the truth, though. Oh well.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Warpy
(111,276 posts)Both sides have attracted too many unstable people who fall for cults of personality.
Such people are incapable of developing much perspective. At least here, they have GD as a safety valve and mosh pit.
Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)There's a difference between criticisms and what goes on here at DU. I think Bernie is a great guy, a solid senator and I am choosing to support Hillary. However I and 99% of my fellow Hillary supporters do not talk about Bernie the way his supporters talk about Hillary. There is a difference.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Democat
(11,617 posts)I saw a DU thread this week where someone was going on about "Shillary".
That is beyond truth and no different than Rush Limbaugh.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)Even the current hosts of the hillary group have called her that in the past; it would be a little hypocritical for them to alert on those posts now.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)But I don't think calling her a "corporate shill" or beholden to big banks is beyond the pale. It is all in the language used, I think.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Can you name one thing we say that yall would want us to quit saying?
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)And you know it.
Red Oak
(697 posts)A small example:
From "Do as I say and Not as I do" over on Daily Kos
Criticism of Obama in 08 by Markos after he had the nomination wrapped up:
..there is a line between "moving to the center" and stabbing your allies in the back out of fear of being criticized. And, of late, he's been doing a lot of unnecessary stabbing, betraying his claims of being a new kind of politician. Not that I ever bought it, but Obama is now clearly not looking much different than every other Democratic politician who has ever turned his or her back on the base in order to prove centrist bona fides. That's not an indictment, just an observation."
" Now I know there's a contingent around here that things Obama can do no wrong, and he must never be criticized, and if you do, well fuck you! I respect the sentiment, but will respectfully disagree. We're allowed to do that here. But fair notice -- I will never pull a Rush Limbaugh and carry water for anyone. Not for the Democratic Congress, and not for our future Democratic president. When anyone does something I don't care for, I will say so. I've never pulled my punches before, so why start now?"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sanders-keeps-raising-money--and-spending-it-a-potential-problem-for-clinton/2016/03/05/a8d6d43c-e2eb-11e5-8d98-4b3d9215ade1_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_clintonmarathon-540pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory
If you read the article it seems Markos has really liked Hillary all along. What is funny, or sad, is his turning off of democracy at his site, for reasons he thinks are valid, to support Hillary. It is really no different than what we are seeing from the NYT and WaPo right now in covering Bernie Sanders. To me, Markos is a hypocrite by his current fiat announcement. The comments from some folks - "if you don't like it, go build your own site" are spoken just like Trump or an Oligarch.
Response to Red Oak (Reply #13)
silvershadow This message was self-deleted by its author.
Democat
(11,617 posts)The bashing of Democratic candidates here is sickening.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Since when does limiting ideas and their discussion help Democrats?
Eight years from now?
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Time to circle the wagons, draw straws, and take sides. Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition. Don't fire until you see the whites of their eyes!
And that's just the Democrats.
And they say Trump can't win.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)who took over MY party from me (a labor Democrat, strong union household), then they will have won it all. And I will likely find myself without a party, because it left me. So yeah, the stakes are high. And if you think I'm not motivated, oh I am. Not only did they steal my home from me, along with 70k in hard earned cash, but they also swept their crimes under the rug, called me a liar, and haven't yet stood up to say "Enough!". Bernie has, though. He is espousing the traditional, New Deal values I grew up with. No wavering. No obfuscation. No wishy-washy. No dubious ties. He is a real Democrat, alright. And they (The Third Way) has the nerve to lecture me? I don't think so.
Response to silvershadow (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Darb
(2,807 posts)It is hard to tell some "Bernie" supporters from Teabaggers, quite frankly. So, "we should nuke the site from orbit, just to be safe".
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)Last edited Sun Mar 6, 2016, 04:11 PM - Edit history (1)
the slightest hint of dissent--look at the BOG and HRCG playpens here on DU: they really can't countenance anyone pointing out the glaring contradictions, so they just banbanban all the day long
the closest analogue is certain academese-heavy forms of radicalism: jokes about Clinton as saying Kenny G was her favorite jazz musician produced this welter of pedantic piffle
http://www.salon.com/2016/02/02/bernie_bros_stop_this_meme_your_dumb_joke_about_hillarys_music_taste_isnt_funny_its_predictably_sexist/
http://www.houstonpress.com/arts/your-pop-culture-sanders-vs-clinton-memes-are-sexist-and-unfunny-8130819
http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/users/2016/02/the_bernie_vs_hillary_meme_is_weird_ceaseless_and_kind_of_sexist_just_like.html
http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthis/theres-a-new-bernie-or-hillary-meme-but-is-it-sexist-stereot
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/279562/hillary-clinton-bernie-bro-sexism/
I think my brain popped somewhere between "situates Bernie's dominance in masculine subcultures and products" and Kenny G as unpacking cisheteronormativity
unfortunately for this campus-bound radicalism it doesn't survive contact with the real world: Jeffreys and Marcotte and Valenti simply get no traction in countries where the police have rape units and activists get detonated; frankly, fussing about PIV, men sitting next to kids on planes, and saying transwomen are "infiltrators" is something only very plush academics in stable countries with plenty of state power can say
Yavin4
(35,442 posts)People are too tied up into seeing Bernie win instead of seeing the Progressive movement win. If you want a more Progressive America, YOU HAVE TO ELECT A MORE PROGRESSIVE CONGRESS.
Okay, you hate Hillary. Fine. The best way to manage that is to get more Progressives elected to congress and force her to your agenda. Pinning all of your hopes on one candidacy is not being politically smart.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)AND work to elect a more progressive congress simultaneously.
Yavin4
(35,442 posts)So they won't bother to vote nor support any other progressive.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)Land of Enchantment
(1,217 posts)and other sites (MyDD) and the one for Howard I left years ago and dropped off the map refusing to be caught up in the BS again. I have ventured over there a few times recently and unsubscribed when I received a Kos sponsored request to donate to Hillary. I sent an email rippin them a new one and have not hear from them since. Ridiculous.