Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 01:55 AM Mar 2016

Daily Kos Asks Its Community To Moderate Criticisms Of Hillary Clinton Or Face Banishment From Site

‘…Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton may still be duking it out on the campaign trail, but at least one major progressive blog and activism site is already preparing for the general election.

Markos “Kos” Moulitsas, founder of the Daily Kos, a popular liberal web site, wrote a blogpost on Friday asking the site’s community of writers, readers and commenters to begin moderating their criticism of Clinton starting on March 15, in the likely event that Clinton solidifies her hold on the nomination with additional primary wins.

If Sanders does not turn the tide, Moulitsas wrote, “then on March 15 this site officially transitions to General Election footing. That means, we will focus our attention not just on Donald Trump or his rivals, but also on the Senate, the House, and state-level races.”

“If you want the most liberal government possible, we aren’t going to get that this cycle in the White House, but we can keep building the bench down the ballot so that come 2024, we have lots of great liberals to choose from,” Moulitsas added

more at link: http://theintellectualist.co/daily-kos-asks-its-community-to-moderate-criticisms-of-hillary-clinton-or-face-banishment-from-site/

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Daily Kos Asks Its Community To Moderate Criticisms Of Hillary Clinton Or Face Banishment From Site (Original Post) silvershadow Mar 2016 OP
"if sanders does not turn the tide..." don't give up hope just yet n t msongs Mar 2016 #1
Someone will have to fill me in. I just unfollowed them, and cancelled subscriptions. nt silvershadow Mar 2016 #2
DU will get more members, then RobertEarl Mar 2016 #3
Hopefully. nt silvershadow Mar 2016 #7
What makes you think they'll be welcome here? nxylas Mar 2016 #15
Makes a lot of sense. Nye Bevan Mar 2016 #4
Isn't it funny that we already have a "presumptive" nominee? How democratic- NOT. nt silvershadow Mar 2016 #6
Kos may be a little early, but it's not a wildly unrealistic assessment. MH1 Mar 2016 #24
It will end if she changes her behavior. JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #8
I will enjoy spending time over there bravenak Mar 2016 #5
Jeez, good luck to them and the Red Sox on that one Warpy Mar 2016 #9
Way to go Daily Kos! Firebrand Gary Mar 2016 #10
I guess I would need specifics? Not sure if I've ever seen anything untruthful or not... nt silvershadow Mar 2016 #11
Using right wing insults for either Democratic candidate is disgusting Democat Mar 2016 #17
That's not exclusively a right wing thing noamnety Mar 2016 #26
Yes, it's probably a good idea to avoid nicknames like that. alarimer Mar 2016 #33
Right-oo RobertEarl Mar 2016 #12
BULLSHIT! ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #21
In other news - full fledged shit storm erupts at Daily Kos Red Oak Mar 2016 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #14
DU will eventually do the same for both Clinton and Sanders Democat Mar 2016 #16
Democracy Markos Style Octafish Mar 2016 #18
It's going to be a very dirty election, everything is at stake. bemildred Mar 2016 #19
Everything indeed is at stake. If we don't wrest control away from the Third Way interlopers silvershadow Mar 2016 #29
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #20
The reasoning is sound. Darb Mar 2016 #22
Poor, poor, Hillary. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #23
also if you notice they really CAN'T debate, so they just have to use main force to expel MisterP Mar 2016 #25
This is why I DON'T support Bernie and why I think that his campaign is doing more harm than good Yavin4 Mar 2016 #27
It seems to me that we can support Bernie Blue_In_AK Mar 2016 #30
I'm seeing people get too down emotionally if Bernie doesn't win Yavin4 Mar 2016 #32
Good. Attacks should be focused on the GOP. Metric System Mar 2016 #28
As an early poster on Kos Land of Enchantment Mar 2016 #31
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
3. DU will get more members, then
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 02:10 AM
Mar 2016

And they will be Bernie fans.

I think KOS is making a big mistake. Limiting free speech is not too wise.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
15. What makes you think they'll be welcome here?
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 06:52 AM
Mar 2016

I expect similar purges to start here too. If they have any sense, Kos refugees will head somewhere a little more...radical.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
4. Makes a lot of sense.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 02:10 AM
Mar 2016
So here’s what happens on March 15:

I will no longer tolerate malicious attacks on our presumptive presidential nominee or our presidential efforts. What does that mean?

No attacks on Hillary Clinton using right-wing tropes of sources. She’s had 30 years of bullshit flung at her from the Right, there’s no need to have Daily Kos give them an assist.

Constructive criticism from the Left is allowed. There’s a difference between constructive and destructive criticism. Do I need to spell it out? It’s the difference between “We need to put pressure on her to do the right thing on TPP” versus “she’s a sell-out corporatist whore oligarch.” In general, if you’re resorting to cheap sloganeering like “oligarch” or “warmonger” or “neocon”, you might want to reframe your argument in a more substantive, issue-focused and constructive matter. Again, I’m not interested in furthering the Right’s hate-fueled media machine. If that’s what you want, might I suggest Free Republic?

Saying you won’t vote, or will vote for Trump, or will vote for Jill Stein (or another Third Party) is not allowed. If that’s how you feel, but have other places in which you can be constructive on the site, then keep your presidential feelings to yourself. Those of us who care about our country and it’s future are focused on victory. If you aren’t, then it’s a big internet, I suggest you find more hospitable grounds for your huffing, puffing, and stomping of feet.

http://m.dailykos.com/stories/2016/3/4/1495813/-March-15-and-Daily-Kos-transition-to-General-Election-footing


I'm looking forward to seeing the end of the "warmongering oligarch" type stuff here on DU, too.


MH1

(17,600 posts)
24. Kos may be a little early, but it's not a wildly unrealistic assessment.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 11:08 AM
Mar 2016

I would prefer Bernie Sanders as president. But I find the constant bashing from both sides of their non-preferred candidate to be extremely tiresome and potentially damaging.

In theory it's still possible for Bernie to pull it out, but it is increasingly unrealistic. The math just doesn't work.

But ok, you disagree. When do you think would be the right time? Only when the convention is held? Or when the delegate math becomes incontrovertible?

Warpy

(111,276 posts)
9. Jeez, good luck to them and the Red Sox on that one
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 02:33 AM
Mar 2016

Both sides have attracted too many unstable people who fall for cults of personality.

Such people are incapable of developing much perspective. At least here, they have GD as a safety valve and mosh pit.

Firebrand Gary

(5,044 posts)
10. Way to go Daily Kos!
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 02:34 AM
Mar 2016

There's a difference between criticisms and what goes on here at DU. I think Bernie is a great guy, a solid senator and I am choosing to support Hillary. However I and 99% of my fellow Hillary supporters do not talk about Bernie the way his supporters talk about Hillary. There is a difference.

Democat

(11,617 posts)
17. Using right wing insults for either Democratic candidate is disgusting
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 06:58 AM
Mar 2016

I saw a DU thread this week where someone was going on about "Shillary".

That is beyond truth and no different than Rush Limbaugh.

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
26. That's not exclusively a right wing thing
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 03:45 PM
Mar 2016

Even the current hosts of the hillary group have called her that in the past; it would be a little hypocritical for them to alert on those posts now.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
33. Yes, it's probably a good idea to avoid nicknames like that.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 04:48 PM
Mar 2016

But I don't think calling her a "corporate shill" or beholden to big banks is beyond the pale. It is all in the language used, I think.

Red Oak

(697 posts)
13. In other news - full fledged shit storm erupts at Daily Kos
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 03:02 AM
Mar 2016

A small example:

From "Do as I say and Not as I do" over on Daily Kos

Criticism of Obama in 08 by Markos after he had the nomination wrapped up:


..there is a line between "moving to the center" and stabbing your allies in the back out of fear of being criticized. And, of late, he's been doing a lot of unnecessary stabbing, betraying his claims of being a new kind of politician. Not that I ever bought it, but Obama is now clearly not looking much different than every other Democratic politician who has ever turned his or her back on the base in order to prove centrist bona fides. That's not an indictment, just an observation."

" Now I know there's a contingent around here that things Obama can do no wrong, and he must never be criticized, and if you do, well fuck you! I respect the sentiment, but will respectfully disagree. We're allowed to do that here. But fair notice -- I will never pull a Rush Limbaugh and carry water for anyone. Not for the Democratic Congress, and not for our future Democratic president. When anyone does something I don't care for, I will say so. I've never pulled my punches before, so why start now?"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sanders-keeps-raising-money--and-spending-it-a-potential-problem-for-clinton/2016/03/05/a8d6d43c-e2eb-11e5-8d98-4b3d9215ade1_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_clintonmarathon-540pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory


If you read the article it seems Markos has really liked Hillary all along. What is funny, or sad, is his turning off of democracy at his site, for reasons he thinks are valid, to support Hillary. It is really no different than what we are seeing from the NYT and WaPo right now in covering Bernie Sanders. To me, Markos is a hypocrite by his current fiat announcement. The comments from some folks - "if you don't like it, go build your own site" are spoken just like Trump or an Oligarch.

Response to Red Oak (Reply #13)

Democat

(11,617 posts)
16. DU will eventually do the same for both Clinton and Sanders
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 06:55 AM
Mar 2016

The bashing of Democratic candidates here is sickening.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
18. Democracy Markos Style
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:49 AM
Mar 2016

Since when does limiting ideas and their discussion help Democrats?

Eight years from now?

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
19. It's going to be a very dirty election, everything is at stake.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 08:04 AM
Mar 2016

Time to circle the wagons, draw straws, and take sides. Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition. Don't fire until you see the whites of their eyes!

And that's just the Democrats.

And they say Trump can't win.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
29. Everything indeed is at stake. If we don't wrest control away from the Third Way interlopers
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 03:58 PM
Mar 2016

who took over MY party from me (a labor Democrat, strong union household), then they will have won it all. And I will likely find myself without a party, because it left me. So yeah, the stakes are high. And if you think I'm not motivated, oh I am. Not only did they steal my home from me, along with 70k in hard earned cash, but they also swept their crimes under the rug, called me a liar, and haven't yet stood up to say "Enough!". Bernie has, though. He is espousing the traditional, New Deal values I grew up with. No wavering. No obfuscation. No wishy-washy. No dubious ties. He is a real Democrat, alright. And they (The Third Way) has the nerve to lecture me? I don't think so.

Response to silvershadow (Original post)

 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
22. The reasoning is sound.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 11:01 AM
Mar 2016

It is hard to tell some "Bernie" supporters from Teabaggers, quite frankly. So, "we should nuke the site from orbit, just to be safe".

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
25. also if you notice they really CAN'T debate, so they just have to use main force to expel
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 03:37 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Sun Mar 6, 2016, 04:11 PM - Edit history (1)

the slightest hint of dissent--look at the BOG and HRCG playpens here on DU: they really can't countenance anyone pointing out the glaring contradictions, so they just banbanban all the day long

the closest analogue is certain academese-heavy forms of radicalism: jokes about Clinton as saying Kenny G was her favorite jazz musician produced this welter of pedantic piffle

http://www.salon.com/2016/02/02/bernie_bros_stop_this_meme_your_dumb_joke_about_hillarys_music_taste_isnt_funny_its_predictably_sexist/
http://www.houstonpress.com/arts/your-pop-culture-sanders-vs-clinton-memes-are-sexist-and-unfunny-8130819
http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/users/2016/02/the_bernie_vs_hillary_meme_is_weird_ceaseless_and_kind_of_sexist_just_like.html
http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthis/theres-a-new-bernie-or-hillary-meme-but-is-it-sexist-stereot
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/279562/hillary-clinton-bernie-bro-sexism/

I think my brain popped somewhere between "situates Bernie's dominance in masculine subcultures and products" and Kenny G as unpacking cisheteronormativity

unfortunately for this campus-bound radicalism it doesn't survive contact with the real world: Jeffreys and Marcotte and Valenti simply get no traction in countries where the police have rape units and activists get detonated; frankly, fussing about PIV, men sitting next to kids on planes, and saying transwomen are "infiltrators" is something only very plush academics in stable countries with plenty of state power can say

Yavin4

(35,442 posts)
27. This is why I DON'T support Bernie and why I think that his campaign is doing more harm than good
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 03:45 PM
Mar 2016
“If you want the most liberal government possible, we aren’t going to get that this cycle in the White House, but we can keep building the bench down the ballot so that come 2024, we have lots of great liberals to choose from,” Moulitsas added


People are too tied up into seeing Bernie win instead of seeing the Progressive movement win. If you want a more Progressive America, YOU HAVE TO ELECT A MORE PROGRESSIVE CONGRESS.

Okay, you hate Hillary. Fine. The best way to manage that is to get more Progressives elected to congress and force her to your agenda. Pinning all of your hopes on one candidacy is not being politically smart.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
30. It seems to me that we can support Bernie
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 04:08 PM
Mar 2016

AND work to elect a more progressive congress simultaneously.

Yavin4

(35,442 posts)
32. I'm seeing people get too down emotionally if Bernie doesn't win
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 04:11 PM
Mar 2016

So they won't bother to vote nor support any other progressive.

Land of Enchantment

(1,217 posts)
31. As an early poster on Kos
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 04:09 PM
Mar 2016

and other sites (MyDD) and the one for Howard I left years ago and dropped off the map refusing to be caught up in the BS again. I have ventured over there a few times recently and unsubscribed when I received a Kos sponsored request to donate to Hillary. I sent an email rippin them a new one and have not hear from them since. Ridiculous.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Daily Kos Asks Its Commun...