How the Supreme Court Schedule Will Help Big Business this Year
http://www.nationofchange.org/how-supreme-court-schedule-will-help-big-business-year-1338900400
Citizens United, the U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped bring even more corporate money into politics, has already made history. Outside groups have spent record amounts influencing the 2012 election already propelling unlikely candidates like Newt Gingrich to remain in the race for far longer than actual voters seemed to want them around. People on the right and left have called for the Supreme Court to overturn this decision, and the Court has an opportunity to do so. Its currently deciding whether to hear a Montana Supreme Court case which ruled that Montana could use a century-old state law on its books to keep corporate money out of politics.
Even while it is possible (if unlikely, thanks to the 5-4 majority maintained by conservative justices) to overturn Citizens United, the Courts impending decision wont affect the 2012 race. Justice John Roberts court schedule makes clear that, even if they formally accepted the case, the Justices wouldnt even look at it until their next term, starting October 1. The final ruling would come after the election, notes Lyle Denniston of the SCOTUS blog provided by Bloomberg Law.
ThinkProgress has pointed out that this is most likely to help Republican nominee Mitt Romney, who has $1 billion from outside groups behind him (far dwarfing Barack Obamas own super PAC fundraising efforts). This fact doubles the sting for liberals, who are victims of not only less cash, but less power within the Court. The New Yorkers Jeffrey Toobin recently reported on how conservative Chief Justice John Roberts essentially orchestrated the case so that it would be vastly more far-reaching than originally intended. Citizens United, he writes, reflects the aggressive conservative judicial activism of the Roberts Court:
It was once liberals who were associated with using the courts to overturn the work of the democratically elected branches of government, but the current Court has matched contempt for Congress with a disdain for many of the Courts own precedents. When the Court announced its final ruling on Citizens United, on January 21, 2010, the vote was five to four and the majority opinion was written by Anthony Kennedy. Above all, though, the result represented a triumph for Chief Justice Roberts. Even without writing the opinion, Roberts, more than anyone, shaped what the Court did. As American politics assumes its new form in the post-Citizens United era, the credit or the blame goes mostly to him.