Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I don't like protesters stopping Bernie or Hillary or Trump or Cruz! (Original Post) Logical Mar 2016 OP
He's dangerous. His is hate speech and growing more dangerous. morningfog Mar 2016 #1
They think our candidates are dangerous too jberryhill Mar 2016 #10
And who are we urging to be rounded up.... daleanime Mar 2016 #27
Once again... jberryhill Mar 2016 #31
Thank you for the lesson on republican thinking..... daleanime Mar 2016 #44
But Trump's racism is dangerous! CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #29
I see it as someone else exercising their free speech by speaking out against someone's (free) hate Iris Mar 2016 #2
People shouting past each other is not free speech jberryhill Mar 2016 #11
I agree. dana_b Mar 2016 #24
Absolutely. The KKK or the Westboro Baptist Church have the right to assemble but so too do liberal_at_heart Mar 2016 #34
I have a different opinion. cheapdate Mar 2016 #3
+1 dana_b Mar 2016 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author IsItJustMe Mar 2016 #4
This was an exercise in free speech Scootaloo Mar 2016 #5
Then the loudest wins jberryhill Mar 2016 #12
Volume and weight are different measurements. Scootaloo Mar 2016 #20
Amen..... daleanime Mar 2016 #28
This is serious. Trump could be President. CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #32
^^^THIS^^^ rbrnmw Mar 2016 #33
And that's how Nixon won on "law and order" - twice! jberryhill Mar 2016 #35
"Their purpose is to demonstrate that many abhor what is being said" jberryhill Mar 2016 #37
Well written and... WiffenPoof Mar 2016 #38
he's yelling 'fire' in the theater....not a free speech issue to me. spanone Mar 2016 #6
Yelling fire in a crowded theatre is protected free speech. Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2016 #43
Are you saying that people don't have the right to protest? IsItJustMe Mar 2016 #7
I will not deny their right to protest. Rex Mar 2016 #8
It's not my strategy but I applaud their efforts. joshcryer Mar 2016 #9
No he won't jberryhill Mar 2016 #13
Can you imagine either of our candidates telling their audience intrepidity Mar 2016 #16
I think he'll ramp up security. joshcryer Mar 2016 #18
No, it probably did more harm than good Albertoo Mar 2016 #14
If Trump doubles down expect it to escalate. joshcryer Mar 2016 #19
To paraphrase Rubio from Tonight Doctor Jack Mar 2016 #15
I have to say, when I heard Rubio say that, intrepidity Mar 2016 #17
I was shocked that he included the dems Doctor Jack Mar 2016 #21
I hope you are correct intrepidity Mar 2016 #22
I disagree very strongly. jberryhill Mar 2016 #36
I very much like protesters stopping Trump because he's telling them to flamingdem Mar 2016 #23
Agreed Doctor Jack Mar 2016 #26
protesting him was great; tying the protest to another candidate was very bad form FreedomRain Mar 2016 #30
I'm concerned that there'll be shooting at future events. Ilsa Mar 2016 #39
enough with the Facism Macattack1 Mar 2016 #40
Everyone has the right to protest but not to prevent you or me from speaking. pampango Mar 2016 #41
Ah yes, because taking the higher ground and being the better person has gotten us SO far. HughBeaumont Mar 2016 #42
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
10. They think our candidates are dangerous too
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:38 AM
Mar 2016

The "but we are right" argument of behavior is one that depends on everyone having the same definition of "right"

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
27. And who are we urging to be rounded up....
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:27 AM
Mar 2016

And deported? How many assaulted at a Hillary rally, how many arrested at Bernie's?

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
31. Once again...
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:46 AM
Mar 2016

The thing about people who do not think the way you do, is that they don't think the way you do.

They are faced with (a) a commie atheist, who wasn't a Christian in the first place, who they believe is calling for the abolition of private property and outlawing religion (b) a lesbian who intends to have all men castrated while taking away their guns and disbanding the military.

You seem to labor under the delusion that these people live in the same reality as you. They don't.

In 2008, I remember my wife and I chatting with a nice young man at a local bar. He was in the Marines and he told us that EVERYONE in the Marines knew that Hillary intended to disband the Marine Corps if she was elected. She intended to do this as revenge against the entire Corps, because when she was in the White House, she wanted to get revenge against her husband by sleeping with one of the Marine honor guard. The guard refused, and so she vowed to eliminate the Marines.

Now, mind you, this young man seemed otherwise perfectly normal, and it is my understanding that one has to pass an IQ test of some kind in order to get in.

But this is something he firmly believed as fact, because he heard it from his CO, who was very well connected.

You have no idea the shit people sincerely believe. That it is flat out crazy has no relation to the sincerity of their belief.

There is not a SINGLE R candidate (other than the hopeless Kasich) which does not want to deport all undocumented immigrants. Trump is hardly unusual in that regard.



daleanime

(17,796 posts)
44. Thank you for the lesson on republican thinking.....
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 11:21 AM
Mar 2016

since I've never encountered it before. I've never argued about gay marriage with my brother. Haven't experienced my brother-in-law saying that Mitt was right about the 47%. Or endured my father bragging about what a great VP Palin was going to be.

I've been dealing with it since my earliest memories, which were discussing woman's rights with my grandmother. Care to guess which one of us was for them? And the one thing that I've learned is that you don't back down. They have every right to spit out every ugly word they want to, they just have to know that if I'm within hearing range I will call them out on it.

And you know what? Several of my nieces and nephews take after me.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
29. But Trump's racism is dangerous!
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:36 AM
Mar 2016

It's not like we disagree with Trump on issues like Common Core and the minimum wage.

Trump is a racist!!! He says that all Muslims hate us. He wants to stop any Muslim from coming to America. He positions immigrants from Mexico as "rapists" and "murderers." Trump refused to denounce David Duke, a KKK member. His supporters cold cocked a black man at one of his rallies, who was doing nothing wrong.

I'm sorry, but protesting peacefully is a form of expression. It is not violent or wrong. Yes, Trump supporters have a right to attend Trump's rallies. No protester is impeding that.

The protesters are there to say that, "Donald Trump's racism and hate is wrong and we are standing up against it!"

They protest for 15 seconds, they're bounced and 2 minutes later--the rally is normalized. The protesters are exercising free speech too.

We have got to stand up and denounce this. Minorities in this country are afraid because of Trump! We must stand up and show the world that racism, bigotry and hate are wrong!

Iris

(15,669 posts)
2. I see it as someone else exercising their free speech by speaking out against someone's (free) hate
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:47 AM
Mar 2016

speech.

Nothing wrong with that.

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
24. I agree.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:20 AM
Mar 2016

Our candidates don't spew hate speech nor encourage it. This guy is dangerous and unless someone speaks out against him, he's going to get more and more powerful.

Sounds like some other people in history and I am fine with that comparison.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
34. Absolutely. The KKK or the Westboro Baptist Church have the right to assemble but so too do
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:20 AM
Mar 2016

the people who disagree with them. There is usually a anti-racist assembly going on right alongside whatever racist protest the KKK or Westboro Baptist Church has. Trump has been spewing racist hateful speech for a long time. It's great to see people protesting him.

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
3. I have a different opinion.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:48 AM
Mar 2016

Trump's rhetoric has been escalating. Rachel Maddow put together a sequential, time-stamped, series of video clips of Trump speaking from the podium at his rallies, starting February 1st, and proceeding up to his rally earlier today in Missouri.

Good Lord! I knew it was bad, but I didn't know it was THIS bad. He's been encouraging his supporters to physically attack opponents at almost every rally. And it's getting worse and worse. I mean he's encouraging them to really fuck somebody up. He's been "joking" that just regular beatings aren't enough. Unbelievable.

No, I think the protesters are courageous and right to confront him now.

Response to Logical (Original post)

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
5. This was an exercise in free speech
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:49 AM
Mar 2016

You are 100% free to use your voice to shout someone else down.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
12. Then the loudest wins
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:40 AM
Mar 2016

Will you be saying that when Trump supporters shout down our candidates?

And then we have a shouting contest for the rest of the year?
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
20. Volume and weight are different measurements.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:01 AM
Mar 2016

If all they bring is volume, no matter how much, they lose.

What is this? "We better be meek and polite, else they might not be!" Fuck that, they are ATTACKING PEOPLE. There are literal calls for purges and mass violence. They're already drawing blood, and we're supposed to be scared of getting loud?

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
32. This is serious. Trump could be President.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:52 AM
Mar 2016

He could win. Do you realize that?

My husband so astutely pointed out that Trump has pivoted from his crazy, egomaniac routine to his GE Presidential candidate persona. Trump has the crazies in the Rep party on his side, now he's going after the indies and Dems. He recently began talking about how awful the free trade deals are; and how corrupt the corporations and their dirty money are. He's also positioning himself as anti-war and suggesting that Bush should be in jail for Iraq.

Trump has fueled record Republican voter turnout.

The man is dangerous, but he is not dumb.
This is not funny anymore.

And what happens as he rises in popularity and more people buy what he's selling? What will we say to future generations? I'm sorry, but we didn't want to be rude and disrupt his rallies, so we just allowed him to spew racist, xenophobic hate and amass more support?

Protests are not simply about disrupting a rally and shouting. Their purpose is to demonstrate that many abhor what is being said. Our country needs to see that presence and minorities in this country need to see that many in this country find Trump's racism unacceptable.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
35. And that's how Nixon won on "law and order" - twice!
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:24 AM
Mar 2016

Last edited Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:56 AM - Edit history (1)

What you see, and what others see, even when looking at the same thing - is not the same thing.

You see people standing up to his odious ideas. Others see chaos.

And one thing that tends to sort people into "conservative" and "liberal" is their fear response.

People with a larger amygdala tend toward conservatism. Disorder frightens them. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human-beast/201104/conservatives-big-fear-brain-study-finds

With all of the protests against him, why did people not realize that Nixon was a paranoid authoritarian? The reason is pretty simple. By exploiting the disorder itself to persuade voters that a paranoid aurhoritarian was precisely what the country needed to "restore law and order".

Even as Trump's support in the GOP base has grown, so has the margin of ANY D candidate against him in the general.

Absolutely it is important for people to understand how toxic his ideas are. But he does a fantastic job of that by himself.

You think there is any Trump voter anywhere in this country this evening who said "Gee, a lot of folks sure are upset by Trump. I guess I'll vote for Clinton or Sanders."

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
43. Yelling fire in a crowded theatre is protected free speech.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 10:54 AM
Mar 2016

There's a really important word people always omit from the famous quotation.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
9. It's not my strategy but I applaud their efforts.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:53 AM
Mar 2016

I actually think in this case it did a lot of good. At the bare minimum Trump will have to back off the incitement crap.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
13. No he won't
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:41 AM
Mar 2016

His people will show up to disrupt our candidates rallies.

That's all I see coming out of this.

intrepidity

(7,336 posts)
16. Can you imagine either of our candidates telling their audience
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:48 AM
Mar 2016

that the protestors ought to be sent out on a stretcher?

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
18. I think he'll ramp up security.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:50 AM
Mar 2016

Word is that there were only a handful of police inside the stadium, they were all outside handling the protesters.

I expect there to be "free speech zones" and people who protest near the venue will be escorted to those zones (or arrested for disobeying a lawful order or whatever). I expect more security inside the venue.

But he'll say "I disagree with that one supporter punching that protester." (We still haven't heard him say anything about it.) And "disavow" all such behavior.

As far as Trump supporters going to other candidates rallies? I would be utterly stunned if that happens given the political makeup and demographics of his crowd. They are going to play the victims big time.

 

Albertoo

(2,016 posts)
14. No, it probably did more harm than good
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:46 AM
Mar 2016
At the bare minimum Trump will have to back off the incitement crap.

I can see the reverse happening: Trump doubling down on his rhetoric, and the crowds cheering when he will say his voice cannot be shut down by violent goons. Or something to that effect.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
19. If Trump doubles down expect it to escalate.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:55 AM
Mar 2016

You cannot have a venue of 10k people with a chunk of those people pissed off. People would die. Trump is very likely being told to drop the incitement crap. I would be stunned if he continued it because it can go south very quickly.

His pivot will be "Look, we're good people, all my supporters are good people. What happened the other day was pathetic. I know you all will do the right thing, but my people keep telling me I have to say it, so I'm saying it. I want you guys to just keep being good people and not being like those violent, ugly, nasty thugs, and just keep on being good to one another. So I don't want anyone being bad like those "protesters," I want you to keep being great!"

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
15. To paraphrase Rubio from Tonight
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:47 AM
Mar 2016

You don't see violence at his rallies, Cruz's rallies, Sanders rallies, or Clinton's rallies, only at Trump's rallies. It is Trump's fault for inciting this type of reaction.


If people opposing Trump are being beaten at his rallies, this will be the reaction. It is the duty of all good people to stand of to evil in this world and we saw that on display tonight.

intrepidity

(7,336 posts)
17. I have to say, when I heard Rubio say that,
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:50 AM
Mar 2016

I was impressed that he included Sanders and Clinton in his list. Very un republican of him. Not that I like him now, lol. Just was glad he said it.

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
21. I was shocked that he included the dems
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:05 AM
Mar 2016

It pains me to say but him and Cruz both sounded presidential, for once, in their reactions. I feel like most republicans like them walk around in a haze all day everyday but even they see that Trump is very dangerous. I am really starting to think, once the general election starts, we are going to have some very unlikely allies from the republican party on our side that want to help us take down Trump. It won't last forever, much like the alliance between the U.S/England with the Soviet Union in WWII against the Axis powers but I believe many of us will be saying "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" come the fall.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
36. I disagree very strongly.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:30 AM
Mar 2016

They find Trump dangerous, but not for the reasons you believe.

Did you hear what Rubio said?

He said that the problem with Trump is "He says out loud what a lot of people are thinking. And you can't just do that in politics."

It was a very close statement to what I am quoting from memory - so that's not an exact quote.

But Rubio's point is that Trump gives away the game. You see, yes of course we don't like Mexicans, blacks, Muslims, etc., but we aren't supposed to SAY those things out loud. In order to be politically viable, you have to just wink and nod, not come right out and say it.

flamingdem

(39,328 posts)
23. I very much like protesters stopping Trump because he's telling them to
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:17 AM
Mar 2016

mess with protesters and that's not legal or right.

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
26. Agreed
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:22 AM
Mar 2016

Its not just about "will we win this news cycle", its about standing up for what is right. Protesters are being beaten at Trump rallies while this guy, who says he wants to be the president, eggs them on. I don't care if the spineless media says the anti-Trump forces in this country won or lost tonight, the city of Chicago, my home town, stood up and said we are not going to deal with Trump's fascist bullshit. My city and my alma mater made me proud tonight. As they say, the kids are alright

FreedomRain

(413 posts)
30. protesting him was great; tying the protest to another candidate was very bad form
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:38 AM
Mar 2016

They WILL deem it as a call for payback.

Ilsa

(61,698 posts)
39. I'm concerned that there'll be shooting at future events.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 08:14 AM
Mar 2016

I guess they cannot bring guns in these open or CC states. But they can hang out and start firing next time they don't like the look of a protester.

 

Macattack1

(34 posts)
40. enough with the Facism
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 08:37 AM
Mar 2016

free speech works both ways for cripes sake...it does the left no good to act like storm troopers shutting down free speech. We should have more faith in Americans to not vote for this guy, instead of preventing them in hearing why.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
41. Everyone has the right to protest but not to prevent you or me from speaking.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 08:54 AM
Mar 2016

If you or I are breaking a law with our speech, eg shouting 'fire' in a crowded theater or inciting violence, we should be arrested and charged. Otherwise, we have the right to speak and the right to protest, but not prevent, the other's speech.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
42. Ah yes, because taking the higher ground and being the better person has gotten us SO far.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 09:28 AM
Mar 2016

Ask these white Klansmen wannabes if they want to find a middle ground.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I don't like protesters s...