Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 05:32 PM Mar 2016

Seth Meyers Destroys GOP Claims About Voter ID Laws And Voter Fraud

http://winningdemocrats.com/watch-seth-meyers-destroys-gop-claims-about-voter-id-laws-and-voter-fraud-video/

Republicans have complained for years that Democrats are “stealing” elections because ineligible people vote, people vote using the names of the deceased, etc, etc. But whenever they have gone looking for the elusive person who is committing in-person voter fraud, they have largely come up empty. Oh sure, there have been cases here and there, but there has never been a proven case where voter fraud changed the results of an election.

The GOP lost its collective mind when Barack Obama was elected in 2008, because they seemed to realize that if the country would elect a black Democrat, Americans would probably not shy away from voting for a Democrat of literally any race or creed. Republicans nationwide knew they had to do something about that.

The 2010 mid-terms brought about the losses that a sitting president’s party can almost always expect and Republicans took control of a number of state legislatures and governors’ mansions. Many of those GOP-controlled legislatures set out on a literal war on voting. As we entered the 2016 election season, nine states had what the National Conference of State Legislatures calls “strict” photo ID laws on the books. Another eight had a “non-strict” photo ID law. There would be even more, except that court challenges have struck down the laws in some states.

Seth Meyers took a look at these laws on “Late Night,” and found the same things that others have found: in many places the laws are making it almost impossible for some people to vote. He highlights the absurdity of these laws with the example of a 94-year-old North Carolina resident who had to make 10 visits to the DMV, which required driving over 200 miles and over 20 hours of her time. Meyers observes,
94-year-olds are not committing voter fraud. Old people don’t pull scams, they get scammed. Ninety-four is a terrible age to start a long con. ‘First, I’ll get a Democrat elected. And then, oh, I died.’


17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
2. Except that they don't care about Seth Meyers and their plan is working...
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 05:42 PM
Mar 2016

And there has not been an effective counter to their voter suppression.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
4. I tend to wince whenever I read that someone has "destroyed" or "demolished" a politician -
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 07:05 PM
Mar 2016

because they are all still there the next day. Maybe having a beer. Good theater, though.

Dont call me Shirley

(10,998 posts)
3. And where is the DNC, DLC, and DWS screaming about voter ID and other voter suppression laws?
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 05:45 PM
Mar 2016

Anybody have a valid answer? Anybody? Hello?

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
8. In 2009, Democrats in DC had an opportunity to protect our votes and voting rights.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 11:32 AM
Mar 2016

They passed. Makes one wonder.

Orrex

(63,210 posts)
10. Sanders must have thought so, since he voted Yea
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:54 PM
Mar 2016

But I guess that his was a principled vote, while everyone else was a sell-out.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
11. Sanders had no opportunity to vote on a new voting rights bill. That said, the ACA ...
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:15 PM
Mar 2016

... is better than what we had without it, flawed as it is, so I'm glad Bernie voted for it. But it is flawed, in a major way.

Orrex

(63,210 posts)
12. Your characterization of the ACA is more reasonable...
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:24 PM
Mar 2016

than "a giveaway to for profit health companies" that "was more important..."

Orrex

(63,210 posts)
14. And Sanders voted for that giveaway
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:33 PM
Mar 2016

We can rationalize however we want, but any any post hoc justification that we imagine for Sanders will equally apply to anyone else who voted for it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Seth Meyers Destroys GOP ...