General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWow.......Rockefeller family charity to withdraw all investments in fossil fuel companies
The Rockefeller Family Fund, a charity set up in 1967 by descendants of John D Rockefeller, said on Wednesday that it would divest from all fossil fuel holdings as quickly as possible.
There is no sane rationale for companies to continue to explore for new sources of hydrocarbons, the RFF, which has relatively small total holdings of $130m (£92m), said in a statement. We must keep most of the already discovered reserves in the ground if there is any hope for human and natural ecosystems to survive and thrive in the decades ahead.
We would be remiss if we failed to focus on what we believe to be the morally reprehensible conduct on the part of ExxonMobil.
Evidence appears to suggest that the company worked since the 1980s to confuse the public about climate changes march, while simultaneously spending millions to fortify its own infrastructure against climate changes destructive consequences and track new exploration opportunities as the Arctics ice receded.
and this:
Exxon knew of climate change in 1981, email says but it funded deniers for 27 more years
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jul/08/exxon-climate-change-1981-climate-denier-funding
Just like the tobacco industry knew nicotine caused cancer, but hid the fact PLUS then added MORE nicotine to cigs to make them more addictive.
rurallib
(62,411 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)BUT, they all knew prior to 1965, 50 years ago, which is when when President Johnson officially notified Congress about fossil fuel emissions and global warming and recommended it start action.
madamesilverspurs
(15,801 posts)A family fortune built on oil has/had "charities" that invest in oil . . . is it just me, or does that sound a bit out of my left pocket and into my right pocket?
Hydra
(14,459 posts)And you'll notice they tend to fund things that help their business interests or their social positions.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)What is this word "morality" of which you speak?
eggplant
(3,911 posts)TeamPooka
(24,223 posts)Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)That is indeed the case. Invest in alternatives; elites have (finally) decided
A lot of the book value the oil majors is based on those discovered but unexploitable resources.
TeamPooka
(24,223 posts)Response to dixiegrrrrl (Original post)
silvershadow This message was self-deleted by its author.
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)It is odd to me that anyone person/family/company can profit from something called "fossil fuel". "Fossil". Okay, pay them for the service/labor of extraction (if we must extract it, but best to leave it in the ground). But the profits from something in the earth, belongs to everyone. Then, we would not have a few billionaires, the wealth would be shared.
Anyway, good for the Rockefeller's to take this action now. Late, but good. May their statement through action help the conservation conversation.