Jamiatul Islam, Tehrik whatever, other groups belonging to the originally native fundie Deobandi school of theology but now also partly Wahhabist Ahl movement that's been going for a good number of decades. The closest we can come to a way of blaming the West for it is the claim it arose in response to British rule. (Which simplifies things more than possible. Much of the problem with the Brits is that they weren't Muslim and made sure that Hindus were treated not much differently than the formerly Muslim rulers and ruling classes.)
Pakistan has a problem that goes deep: Its existence is based on Muslim nationalism and the "we need a Muslim homeland" movement that the Deobandis helped to foster and promote. But having made that their ideological mainstay, it's hard to tamp down the Muslim nationalists (or nationalist Muslims) who want a theocratic, Muslim state.
Israel has a similar problem, that we have no compunctions in condemning because it's okay to diss white educated Westerners, but in the case of Israel there's Western liberal thought with a "all men are equal" in some sense that helps to mitigate that kind of attitude. In Pakistan, "Western liberal thought" = "colonialist beliefs" for many, and there is no corresponding "all men are brothers" thinking. Theirs is a different intellectual tradition, much like pre-Enlightenment Europe's, in which those who are superior should rule and those who are lesser folk should submit. We saw that in Spain under Muslim rule; we saw that in what Spain did in Central America, to the ethnicities there.
= new reply since forum marked as read
