Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:09 AM Mar 2016

"in most European democracies, Sanders and Clinton, Kasich and Trump would be in different parties."

In multiparty systems, such as those found in most European democracies, Sanders and Clinton, John Kasich and Trump would be in different parties. Sanders would probably be a Social Democrat, Clinton a liberal, Kasich a Christian Democrat, and Trump a far-right populist.

Like the European far right, Trump mobilizes members of the majority group who feel that the economy has let them down. These voters are likely to see free trade as a culprit in their economic malaise and to link it with other policies that they consider anti-national, such as open immigration and multiculturalism. With that in mind, it is not surprising that Trump, like the European far right, is an anti-trade populist.

In a multiparty system like those in Europe, groups on the extreme right are typically shut out of government by the unwillingness of center-right parties to form coalitions with them. What we are seeing now is the real chance that the candidate of the populist far right may walk away with the Republican nomination.

If a vote on TPP is indeed postponed until after next January, a President Trump would undoubtedly kill the agreement. A President Clinton, on the other hand, would probably move forward with it and, in a postelection Congress chastened by its brush with the populist right, would stand some chance of success.

http://theconversation.com/can-free-trade-and-tpp-survive-rise-of-the-new-right-56241

This is the first time I have come across The Conversation. It's wiki says it is criticized for being "one-sided" and "staffed by left-leaning refugees from commercial news organisations' withered operations" but that's all I know about the site.

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"in most European democracies, Sanders and Clinton, Kasich and Trump would be in different parties." (Original Post) pampango Mar 2016 OP
I know nothing about Kasich; but it's pretty accurate about the others... LeftishBrit Mar 2016 #1
Thanks for that. When the European far-right populists think Trump is "too much", he pampango Mar 2016 #4
This is a bit forced. potone Mar 2016 #2
Clinton would be Tory / CDU type. Not a liberal. n/t tabasco Mar 2016 #3
Not at all so. eom BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #5
She's to the RIGHT of Merkel. n/t tabasco Mar 2016 #8
Merkel is to the left BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #9
Merkel is to the left of most British Tories, I'd say LeftishBrit Mar 2016 #11
P.S. Although our Tories and Merkel's party are both described as Conservatives, LeftishBrit Mar 2016 #14
Thanks again. eom BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #17
That is very interesting. BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #16
Let's not argue, let's let the political compass guide us. tabasco Mar 2016 #20
If you feel comfortable with these BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #21
It doesn't matter what I'm "comfortable" with. tabasco Mar 2016 #22
Gerhard Schroeder of the SPD was supposed to be a Clinton style moderate in the same form as Blair JVS Mar 2016 #7
Remember that European liberals are for free trade and a market economy muriel_volestrangler Mar 2016 #18
Pretty sure someone as anti-labor as Kasich is in no way a Democrat in any country. HughBeaumont Mar 2016 #6
Christian Democrats are mostly right wing or at least center right. Don't let "Democrat" in the name pampango Mar 2016 #10
And Cruz would have to start the Dominionist Fascist party for himself. nt LostOne4Ever Mar 2016 #12
I saw a wonderful meme earlier KamaAina Mar 2016 #13
Like this? LostOne4Ever Mar 2016 #15
Not quite. KamaAina Mar 2016 #19
Hitler was first elected in a multi-party system, with just a plurality of the vote. pnwmom Mar 2016 #23

LeftishBrit

(41,208 posts)
1. I know nothing about Kasich; but it's pretty accurate about the others...
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:12 AM
Mar 2016

Trump is even too much for some far-right populists; Farage criticized him for going too far. In France, the nutcase party is at present divided between the far-right fascist nutcases led by Le Pen pere, and the moderate fascist nutcases (OK, a bit of a contradiction in terms!) led by Le Pen fille. She has criticized Trump for going a bit too far, while her father has endorsed him.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
4. Thanks for that. When the European far-right populists think Trump is "too much", he
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:34 AM
Mar 2016

really is pretty far out there. I had heard that Mr. Le Pen the Elder was more old school fascist but didn't know he supported Donald. Interesting that Ms. Le Pen the Younger (more media-savvy and a 'moderate fascist nutcase') thinks Trump goes a bit too far.

Thanks for the input.

potone

(1,701 posts)
2. This is a bit forced.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:26 AM
Mar 2016

Kasich wouldn't be a Christian Democrat; he is to the right of them. The other candidates would fit those categories.

BlueMTexpat

(15,370 posts)
9. Merkel is to the left
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:36 PM
Mar 2016

of some US Democrats and certainly of ALL US Republicans, even though she may be considered "right" in view of German politics generally.

Please describe exactly how Hillary is to Merkel's right. Or please stop saying what you are saying.

LeftishBrit

(41,208 posts)
11. Merkel is to the left of most British Tories, I'd say
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:43 PM
Mar 2016

There is a lot of variation between related parties in different countries in Europe, and often within the parties even in the same country.

Overall, and this is VERY approximate:

North and West Europaean Conservatives are mostly similar to moderate American Democrats, though ranging internally from very liberal Democrats to moderate-to-conservative Republicans.

East Europaean Conservatives are more like American Republicans.

British Conservatives come somewhere in between.

Politicians in Social Democratic parties in Europe range from people far to the left of Bernie Sanders, to people who are accidentally in these parties and might be moderate Republicans in America (and the British Labour Party contains ALL of this internally); but Bernie would be fairly typical of many. We may note, however, that Bernie's brother and nephew, who are local to me in Oxfordshire, are/were Councillors for the Green Party rather than the Labour Party.

LeftishBrit

(41,208 posts)
14. P.S. Although our Tories and Merkel's party are both described as Conservatives,
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:58 PM
Mar 2016

they belong to different party groupings in the Europaean Parliament. Her party is in the Christian Democrat group which includes many mainstream Conservative parties from mostly Western and Northern Europe, while our Tories are in a smaller grouping along with the Conservatives of Poland and several other East Europaean countries and some smaller right-wing parties from Western Europe (though UKIP are in a different group, and the National Front types in yet another).

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
20. Let's not argue, let's let the political compass guide us.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:38 PM
Mar 2016

These people do an analysis based on several factors to place politicians on the compass. As you can see, H. Clinton is to the right of A. Merkel.


~original


Here's the link:

http://www.politicalcompass.org/

Please describe exactly why you disagree with the Political Compass analysis or please stop saying what you are saying. LOL.

BlueMTexpat

(15,370 posts)
21. If you feel comfortable with these
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 08:19 PM
Mar 2016

academic exercises instead of evaluating people based on their actual accomplishments in the real world, please continue along that path. This is exactly why you may have difficulty understanding why Hillary is winning the popular vote by some 2.5 million votes right now and will continue to win more.

As a matter of fact, Hillary Clinton is considered by many to be quite liberal. See, e.g., http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-02-05/is-hillary-clinton-a-progressive-depends-on-whos-asking

By the most commonly referenced measure, known as DW-NOMINATE, Clinton was the 11th-most liberal member of the Senate, based on her votes. In the 110th Congress, her final two years in office, Clinton was to the left of then-Delaware Sen. Joe Biden and then-Illinois Sen. Obama. The scoring also puts her much closer on the spectrum, ideologically, to Sanders, the most liberal, than to the most conservative Democrat, Florida Sen. Bill Nelson.


The DW-NOMINATE exercise does not take into account Hillary's actual lifelong contributions to the betterment of the most vulnerable, including minorities, both here and abroad when she was not serving in an elected office and long before being elected or appointed. Can you please cite anything comparable that Bernie has accomplished outside political office other than marching with MLK in the 1960s?

I am a US national who primarily resides in Europe (and in the real world). I will agree to disagree, both with you and with these comfy little charts.
 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
22. It doesn't matter what I'm "comfortable" with.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 02:19 PM
Mar 2016

What matters are facts, which you have not successfully refuted by posting a link to one Newsweek article. Your statement on the number of votes cast is irrelevant to the original discussion and a deflection.

I live in Germany half the time and my wife and family live there all the time so please don't play the "I'm in Europe so I know more about it" card. Your attempted insult ("real world&quot reflects on you, not me.

JVS

(61,935 posts)
7. Gerhard Schroeder of the SPD was supposed to be a Clinton style moderate in the same form as Blair
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:07 PM
Mar 2016

Sanders - Die Linke, or Die Gruenen depending in large part on which part of the country German Sanders would have been born.
Clinton-SPD

With the republicans it becomes more difficult because the republicans are more extremist. But broadly we could say.
Big business and chamber of commerce faction of the republicans - FDP
Religious and social conservative faction of the republicans -CDU

muriel_volestrangler

(101,347 posts)
18. Remember that European liberals are for free trade and a market economy
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:23 PM
Mar 2016

Here's the website of the liberal grouping in the EU parliament:

EU Single Market & Economics

European liberal democrats believe in an economy that is based on market principles where individual economic and political freedoms are guaranteed as the most effective system for ensuring future prosperity, encouraging competiveness and ensuring longer-term employment.Therefore, the ALDE Party has consistently been promoting free trade and a fully functioning European Single Market for the benefit of consumers and small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs).

http://www.aldeparty.eu/en/content/what-we-stand

European liberal parties tend to be the smaller partner in a coalition government - sometimes with the left, sometimes the right.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
6. Pretty sure someone as anti-labor as Kasich is in no way a Democrat in any country.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:55 AM
Mar 2016

He's a social conservative and an economic turbo-wingnut.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
10. Christian Democrats are mostly right wing or at least center right. Don't let "Democrat" in the name
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:47 PM
Mar 2016

confuse you. The Sweden Democrats are far-right populists.

I think you are right that Kasich is way to conservative even for the Christian Democrats in Europe.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
13. I saw a wonderful meme earlier
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:57 PM
Mar 2016

in which an outline of Birdie Sanders was tricked out in red, white and blue to be the progressive answer to the donkey and elephant.

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
23. Hitler was first elected in a multi-party system, with just a plurality of the vote.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 03:09 PM
Mar 2016

So a multi-party system isn't a guarantee against electing a monster.

Also, none of those European systems require 270 convention delegates, a requirement that is required by our Constitution. So a multi-party system is just a pipe dream till we amend the Constitution.

OTOH, our own party contains a backstop against a candidate like Trump: this is what super delegates are for.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"in most European democra...