he doesn't seem like he'd have to pay if he wanted to cheat. And I am NOT implying he still does.

former Pres. Clinton is capable anymore. His health is obviously failing. Also, not needing to pay does not necessarily mean a man would not patronize professionals, for whatever reason. (Charlie Sheen, for instance). Motivations are unpredictable.

I think it went to trial in 2007. But it covered a lot of years.

There are services being paid for...in addition to the services.

History reads about as bad as it could get. What could possibly be worse?

Don't forget. The list is from 10 years ago.

Still, I don't think its him.

I can't imagine that it is him.

I don't think he'd pay for it. I don't think he'd make himself that vulnerable.

He bounces all over the world. If you wanted to cheat, there are much easier and less riskier ways to do it. And I'm not saying that he's doing it.

This just does not seem to be his style.

It probably isn't him. He isn't that stupid.

no one would be surprised, Hillary would just roll her eyes, and honestly I doubt he has to pay for it. If there were those kind of rumors we would have heard them long ago.

Cruz wasn't in D.C. in 2007

The case went to trial in 2007. It must have had current and past clients, maybe??

From Wikipedia:

Between 1999 and 2003, he was the Director of the Office of Policy Planning at the Federal Trade Commission, an Associate Deputy Attorney General at the United States Department of Justice, and domestic policy advisor to George W. Bush on the 2000 George W. Bush presidential campaign.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Cruz

Too gross to imagine, but then again, he would be the one who would need to pay for human contact.

-JB

I think the Cruz thing makes sense in light of the recent National Inquirer story, additionally I read somewhere today his wife has been void of all public appearances since it happened. Good ole "Lyi'n Cruz".

As for Kasich, he's a grimy human being. Eighteen years in DC, he and the Madam probably had a thing together.

the National Enquirer is no longer easily dismissed.

they've been even more proactive about publishing things that are true or can be verified.

I know he won Ohio, but would ending his campaign really affect the race??

to secure enough to delegates to block a first round trump nomination. To that end, Kasich still peels some delegates in the non winner take all states and if he can win just one or two fonts winner take all states, it could make the difference. Cruz and Kasich need to get about 415 delegates more to block a first round trump.

It could be that the lawyer thinks that something involving Bill Clinton matters any more, but it's not exactly news that he has transgressed.

Kasich doesn't really matter. And apparently the timeline says it's not Cruz. I may be biased but it sure doesn't seem in character for Bernie. So it might just be some boring old Bill Clinton stuff and the lawyer just wants his 15 minutes.

Sounds like a bit of a kook. I wouldn't put much stock in this story. Of course I've been shocked before.

I mean, everybody knows about his womanizing. That wouldn't blow the lid off of anything. Somehow, I don't think it was Bernie. He's too much of a mensch. Unless Bill got caught with a dead girl or a live boy, that's old news and wouldn't hurt Hillary's chances. So, it's either Kasich or Cruz. My money is on Cruz.

Couldn't be HRC could it?

So that pretty much counts Kasich out.

Sanders was there; but, I just can't see it.

The Big Dog didn't need an escort service and, I doubt a seating President would need to call one from a cell phone that would be about to be linked to him.

I don't think Trump calling a escort service would effect his run ... Hell, given his base ... it would no doubt give him a bump.

That leaves Cruz ... who was in DC/on the DC scene at the time, and would be most hurt by it.

But then, I can't even imagine the wife of a seating President getting caught up ... But that would be a game changer.

they think he's a saint. i hope it's not him. he does seem like a nice guy. he and jane have been married 27 years, but you never know.

icons that one would never expect anything immoral is growing long. As a shopkeeper in Mexico once told me, " Only Jesus is perfect.".

The DC Madam died in 2008 (I think) and he is the custodian of the files, but a judge put a gag on them. He has asked court to court but says they must be released prior to the conventions. Now he has petitioned the SCOTUS to let him release them or he will do it himself.

-JB

She cancelled her events this week and hasn't tweeted since then.

FWIW

Hmmmmmmmmmmm.

lol

Feel The Bern!

maybe, I suppose

their sex life is their own personal business unless they are hurting others. If they aren't hurting anyone I don't care.

If someone is willing to cheat on their spouse I'm not sure I'd want him/her to run the nation.

If it's an open relationship however...

I think it only speaks about their relationship with their spouse. Are there some people who cheat on their spouse who would be awful leaders? Yes. But that does not mean every person who cheats on their spouse is an awful leader.

and would never qualify for a job - that's ridiculous

Just saying, don't think your candidate is an angel . They are in politics after all.

If you are to the point of thinking some one is infallible, then you have lost your ability to clearly judge their character.

encouraged him to run.

It's about the hypocrisy. So these scandals always hurt the "family values republicans" and "I love God" crowd the most

because of recent BS from the Enquirer. Rachel didn't speculate when she discussed it.

Cruz.

Cruz is the other possibility. Sanders isn't the type and he wouldn't have run if he had any skeletons like that in his closet. I don't think Trump is a paying for sex kind of guy and even if he were, no one would care. The man is an adulterer who has talked about his daughter's hotness and he still leads the GOP race. Clinton would have cooled his jets around the time that this stuff was going on so I don't think it's him. Plus, the Clinton sex narrative has been played out. No one wants to hear about that anymore. In Kasich's case, it could explain the hesitancy of anyone in the GOP to truly embrace him. He's saying he will be the guy coming out of a brokered convention but no one in the GOP seems to be rallying around him, and they never have. It could be that they know he is damaged goods.

He talks today about being the go-to guy on the second ballot at the convention.

was on serious drugs. Jittery and non-coherent. There should definitely be a "take a shot" game for each time he says "Ohio."

he would even have sex. period. Gotta be either Trump or Craz.

Bible-thumping type who cats around with call girls while dressed in diapers.

It's Washington. It could be anyone, including Hillary.

These are phone records we are talking about. These are not necessarily even related to service transactions.

Is it impossible that the DC Madam could have been communicating with Hillary for some reason?

This was a very well connected woman.

Frankly, no man in the race would be a surprise.

around in Jeffery Epstein's Lolita Express and taking trips to his private island in the Caribbean.

Trump will have a field day with this.

period.

Holier than thou usually equals,"i have shit to hide"

It's always the religious ones.

and there's nothing there at all.

It was some years ago and we all know he thinks of women the way he thinks of cars, trading them in on spiffy new models every few years while test driving other models all the time. He'd want discretion and Madams with ultra high priced call girls would provide it.

The only reason it's not likely Sanders is that he'd use a more reasonably priced escort service if he needed companionship for a night.

but. .

Or shut the fuck up

Trump - No one would care. Everyone knows he's a freaking pig and news that he hired hookers would not affect the election at all.
Kasich - Outing him wouldn't affect the election. He's not winning anyway.
Sanders - That'd be a stunner.
HRC - Now THAT would be a stunner.
Cruz - Fits the profile - holier than thou bullcrap spewing out of his cakehole constantly, smarmy and obviously a hypocrite. In fact, I think he's got closeted gay man written all over him.

Maybe that's it, since we're just speculating anyway - it's Cruz and he wanted the company of men. I can't think of anything more delicious than that, and it would certainly affect the election. We know how the repukes feel about those icky gay folks.

Remember, the Enquirer article about icky Ted mentioned "hooker" , so yeah my money is on the creepy, weasel Ted. And I agree, he could go either way, boy or girl. Hillary would indeed be a stunner, either boy or girl. I can't imagine it, but I've been clueless many times before!

this story coming out on the heels of the enquirer story smells like a cruz revelation

Trump's supporters wouldn't care

Sanders I really doubt

Hillary would be news for sure (it's definitely not news if it's Bill)

Kasich is he still in the race?

Cruz seems the most likely and his religious base wouldn't like it

I'm thinking Sanders

It might be time to look back into it some more, though I no longer have the "Net Detective" software that allowed me to look up names via phone numbers and/or addresses...

We know that "Diaper Dave" Vitter was on there... I would bet money, if I had it, that it's either Cruz or Trump... or quite possibly BOTH!

Peace,

Ghost

Could this lawyer leave the country and tell a foreign reporter about what names he has?