good one! Wiley has probably passed Babe Ruth for knocking it out of the park!

eom

There's one group saying "we will support the Democratic nominee, no matter who it is". There's another saying "we'll make the Democratic nominee lose if it's not our candidate".

Which group is demanding a loyalty oath?

Any candidate has to engender sufficient votes in order to be elected. Many Bernie supporters will vote for whoever wins the nomination at GE time. Some, perhaps many won't because they don't want to support status quo. Those are both legitimate views. If Dems lose the election it will be because the candidate failed to inspire sufficient votes -- or the GOP stole the election again or both.

But this is all premature. Let's see who wins the nomination first and then go from there. Bernie supporters want their primary vote counted first. That is reasonable and rightful.

Bernie supporters want their primary vote counted first - and they'll attack anyone who supports Clinton and threaten the future of the Democratic Party if they don't get their way.

Bernie supporters want their primary vote counted - and will have a childish temper tantrum, accusing the Clinton camp of dirty tricks, voter suppression, or just general corruption when Sanders looses.

Bernie supporters want their primary vote counted - and some will happily vote for Trump to make sure Clinton doesn't win.

if ANYONES primary vote isn't counted?

or do you only care about votes for your preferred candidates?

By being sure to elect staunch Democrats in all levels of govt to change the rules & enact legislation to do it.

Staunch Democrats like Hillary Clinton.

isn't showing concern about Arizona. :/

People are more intelligent than you think. To me, it would have saved face for her to claim a victory BUT STILL QUESTION THE RESULTS.

A winner questioning the results of the game they won? Do you know how much integrity that would show?

she is trashed no matter what she does or does not do

are responsible.

Nader's use of it killed it for a time, but like a zombie or a vampire, ill-informed people keep bringing it back from the dead.

tantrums? really?

lt is almost as if you think Bernie supporters are little children.

well, this Bernie supporter and longtime Democrat is disgusted with the corruption in the Democratic party. it is my view that we will never advance in this country with a Third Way Centrist president, and if Hillary wins we will lose Congress in 18 and badly. I dint want Trump to win, but we would do much much better in 18 and 2020 running in opposition than having a highly unpopular Dem incumbant. i also am tired of the Democratic party treating its left flank as toxic (because MCGovern, smh) or as unruly children. which you just did.

i am 49 years old. i am not going wait anymore for the Democratic party to stop drifting right. any action i take or refuse to take will be to pull the Democratic party to the left. this is a long term project which requires looking past a single election. sorry if that offends you.

anyway, I think Bernie is gonna win.

The only people having "trantrums" are the Clinton supporters who are accusing Sanders of being negative, accusing Sanders supporters of being somehow non Democratic Party supporters, and who, when caught doing dirty tricks, claim Sanders supporters are playing foul by accusing them of dirty tricks.
I can tell you one thing clearly, if Hillary Clinton loses it will be because she did not inspire the people, was not thoroughly honest with the people, and let her supporters engage in hatchet jobs like the one you have posted here.

From personal experience, its clear the Clinton campaign is scared, so scared, if you go on any of their social media sites and so much as ask the wrong question, like: How can Clinton stand up to banks when she's taking millions in campaign money from them?, you get booted.

I know of no Sanders supporter who would ever vote Trump for any reason, let alone be so petty as to do it just to stop Clinton.
Perhaps the Clinton supporters think the Sanders supporters would do that because that is where their heads are at. They would be that petty, so they think others would be too.

Or haven't you been paying attention?

Hillary group has over 700 members banned from their group while Bernie's group has what? around 200?

And Bernie supporters are the member hunting predators who grave dance with insulting signatures when people are banned?

Bernie supporters made sites like jackass radicals?

nope. all Hillary supporters. :/

Clinton supporters don't insist on implementing & maintain a double standard on what private records should be made public.

Clinton supporters don't threaten to make sure the GOP wins if their candidate doesn't get nominated.

We will look like Greece after she's done.


She is the better candidate....for the 1%.

get back to reality will you . smh

Who's the bigger threat? Hillary?

how many non believers have the Hillary group blocked? over 700?

hmmm...

It says right on the label: "This is a group, not a forum. Groups often serve as safe havens for members who share similar interests and viewpoints. Individuals who post messages contrary to a particular group's stated purpose can be excluded from posting in that group."

The greater number blocked indicates a larger number of immature losers attempting to disrupt the group, doesn't it?

Disputers aren't allowed in groups, therefor they get blocked.

If you were to look at why some were blocked, it's shameful. I never said a damned thing negative about Hillary in the Hillary group. Not one. I did question why Hillary supporters were shaming someone they knew nothing about.

So don't come at us with "you deserved to be banned" horse hooey.

The label is appropriate.

They sure didn't like the questions i was asking tho.

And you damned well know what site I'm talking about.

what are you talking about ?

wow you think we don't know who the troll is?

tell them they are wasting their time.

I can sell you too.

And Sanders supports believe them without question.

Almost Trumpish in their cult like devotion.

Anything that messes with their saviors image is RW propaganda.

"From Whitewater to Benghazi: A Clinton-Scandal Primer"

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/03/tracking-the-clinton-controversies-from-whitewater-to-benghazi/396182/

You didn't even read the story in your link:

Just how serious is the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails? Since the bureau doesn’t like to speak about it publicly, people have to judge from outside signs—for example, how many agents are working on the case. So when The Washington Post reported this week than there were 147 FBI investigators looking into whether any crimes were committed in the handling of classified material on Clinton’s private email server, and whether that server was hacked, it was a bombshell. Republicans exulted and Democrats felt a rising nausea. The story swept across cable TV and the web.

Except it turns out maybe that wasn’t the case. The FBI now says there are fewer than 50 agents working the case, though it won’t say how many, and the Post corrected its article. It’s yet another case of confusion and fog of war in a story that involves a scandal-plagued political dynasty, partisan intrigue, the intelligence community, the FBI, the vagaries of federal email rules and national-security law, and the obscure world of cybersecurity. Something went wrong here—Clinton has apologized for using the server—but whether any crime was committed remains hazy, subject to interpretations filtered through a partisan lens and leaks from an investigation that remains largely under wraps.

...

No other American politicians—even ones as corrupt as Richard Nixon, or as hated by partisans as George W. Bush—have fostered the creation of a permanent multimillion-dollar cottage industry devoted to attacking them.

one way or the other.

So why should go to the trouble of providing proof?

I have no plans to convince you.

You already worship your corporate goddess.

Like the bullshit "147 FBI agents" story. One guy at the WP was tipped off by one anonymous source - most likely a RW operative - of the bogus number, and the next day there were literally hundreds of "news stories" quoting it, without verifying it, or any attempt to confirm it. They just repeated the lie without question.

Such is the state of American journalism.

And of course these various false stories were linked to thousands of times by the people eager & happy to be lied to, and gleefully salivating for such "news" - RWers, other Clinton haters, and Sanders supporters.

Par for the course.

clearly they are familiar with da Nile.

I bet that I could sell them a space station.

Candidates make themselves lose. My vote is mine to give to the most deserving candidate. End of story. Spend your vote as you see fit.

Just having a D behind there names may not be enough. I'm tired of waiting for candidates to push the positions they campaigned on.

Disguised as laughter. Carry on!

Carry on!

Ouch!

that supporters of a certain candidate sit around licking their own assholes?

That supporters of a certain candidate, with their banal and blind expectation that everyone will line up like fellow robots to vote for that candidate, are hilariously wrong.

Maybe that's where the cats-licking-their-assholes imagery comes in.

But yes, she has many helpers. They don't know why they are helping her, they get a little defensive when people point to the evidence that she serves corporations first and people second, and the need for them to make personal insults is an unfortunate character flaw shared by far too many of them.

Karma's a funny thing. I predict that someday you will recall this little exchange in which you dehumanized a group of people for petty satisfaction.

I've been attacked as a Republican, a Third-Wayer, a corporatist, a shill, and many others. I've been told that I'm bitter, that I'm resentful, that I'm a dinosaur, and that I'm afraid. All of it bullshit

And all of it because I've dared to question the obvious divinity of Senator Sanders as the obvious and only possible choice for President. And before you cry foul about "divinity," I'd remind you of the messianic imagery, the saintly imagery, and the gospel ditties all trotted out in worship of The Man.

So spare the bullshit about "dehumanizing," because that's one race in which Sanders' cheerleaders have a tremendous lead. They started earlier, they hit harder, and when someone is rightly called out for it, a chorus of others pipe right up to cry "The Purge Has Begun!"

must have started elsewhere and been much more widespread.

Fish. Head. Down. Stinks.