Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

think

(11,641 posts)
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 05:32 PM Apr 2016

The FEC just made it easier for super PAC donors to hide their identities

The FEC just made it easier for super PAC donors to hide their identities

By Matea Gold March 7 2016

A divided Federal Election Commission cannot agree to investigate whether super PAC donors used corporations to mask their identities in the 2012 campaign, effectively giving a green light to contributors writing checks through limited-liability companies in this year's elections.

FEC Assistant General Counsel William Powers wrote in letters to the nonprofit advocacy group Campaign Legal Center last week that the six-member panel was split about whether to look into corporate donations that were made in 2011 to Restore Our Future, a super PAC backing then-GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney. At least four commissioners must agree that there is a basis for an investigation before the agency's lawyers can proceed. Absent that consensus, the FEC closed the cases, he wrote.

At issue were three $1 million donations that Restore Our Future received from corporate entities in 2011. Among the donors was W Spann LLC, a company that had been incorporated in Delaware in March 2011 and was dissolved that July. The Campaign Legal Center and Democracy 21 filed a complaint alleging that W Spann's contribution violated a federal ban on straw donors. Shortly afterward, former Romney business associate Edward Conard came forward and admitted he set up the LLC and made the donation through it.

Paul S. Ryan, deputy executive director of the Campaign Legal Center, said Conard appeared to have violated a federal law that prohibits an individual or entity from making a donation in the name of another entity.

"The FEC was not able to muster four votes to even open an investigation," he said. "It took them almost five years to get to it, and then they deadlocked."


Read More:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/03/07/the-fec-just-made-it-easier-for-super-pac-donors-to-hide-their-identities/
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The FEC just made it easier for super PAC donors to hide their identities (Original Post) think Apr 2016 OP
. HuckleB Apr 2016 #1
You can see how useful the FEC is, elleng Apr 2016 #2
These are the clowns that accuse Bernie Politicalboi Apr 2016 #3
These fuckers need to go onecaliberal Apr 2016 #4

elleng

(131,107 posts)
2. You can see how useful the FEC is,
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 05:36 PM
Apr 2016


Among other things, took them this long to NOT arrive at a decision. Unlike most regulatory agencies, by law it's split 1/2 and 1/2, Rep/Dem.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The FEC just made it easi...