Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FLPanhandle

(7,107 posts)
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 02:34 PM Apr 2016

Radioactive Boar Are Thriving And Causing Havoc Near The Fukushima Power Plant

http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/wild-boar-are-thriving-and-causing-havoc-near-fukushima-power-plant

?itok=tiIDEdr5

It’s been over five years since tsunami waves crashed into the Fukushima Daiichi power plant and led to its nuclear meltdown. While 20 kilometers (12 miles) of the land around the plant remains a dangerous exclusion zone, the area's wildlife is taking full advantage of the peace.

Since the nuclear disaster, the population of wild boars has rocketed, much to the dismay of surrounding communities, The Times has reported. In the four years following the disaster, the population of boars is thought to have boomed from 3,000 to 13,000. You might think this ancient Japanese symbol of prosperity and fertility might be welcomed, but it’s estimated they have caused $15 million worth of damage to local agriculture.

Assistant ecology professor Okuda Keitokunin told the Japanese Mainichi newspaper that wild boar, along with racoons, have been using the abandoned houses and emptied buildings in the evacuation zone as a place to breed and shelter.

However, this post-nuclear meltdown town isn't exactly a safe haven for the boars. It’s thought their diet of roots, nuts, berries and water all contain particularly high concentrations of radiation. The animals show no immediate signs of harm from the radiation, however samples from Fukushima's wild boar meat has shown they contain 300 times the safe amount of the radioactive element caesium-137. Another study on the area’s fir trees showed evidence of growth mutations.

Hunters have been offered rewards to cull the boars by local authorities. However, the animals are breeding so quickly they can’t keep up. The city of Nihonmatsu, around 56 kilometers (35 miles) from the Fukushima plant, has dug three mass graves capable of holding 1,800 dead boars. Recently, these have become overfilled and authorities are now struggling to cope with the influx of culled beasts.

The boom in boars is a similar story to Chernobyl’s post-meltdown wildlife. A study from late last year showed that the populations of deer and wild boar are thriving in the area surrounding the Ukrainian nuclear power plant.

In a statement Jim Smith, one of the authors of the Chernobyl study, explained, “It's very likely that wildlife numbers at Chernobyl are much higher than they were before the accident. This doesn't mean radiation is good for wildlife, just that the effects of human habitation, including hunting, farming, and forestry, are a lot worse.”

------------------------------------------------------------


"This doesn't mean radiation is good for wildlife, just that the effects of human habitation, including hunting, farming, and forestry, are a lot worse.” - Says a lot for our species that a radioactive waste land is better for wildlife than human beings are.

Chernobyl has the same situation. It's become a nice wildlife preserve just by removing the human beings.

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Radioactive Boar Are Thriving And Causing Havoc Near The Fukushima Power Plant (Original Post) FLPanhandle Apr 2016 OP
Knowing the culture for pork and exotic foods/dangerous foods packman Apr 2016 #1
A job for... immoderate Apr 2016 #2
Indeed. 2naSalit Apr 2016 #3
True, it is ironic. Or is that Ionic? Nitram Apr 2016 #4
It only takes a little while 2naSalit Apr 2016 #11
It depends on the level of the radiation. Nitram Apr 2016 #16
Oh, no... pintobean Apr 2016 #5
.... Dont call me Shirley Apr 2016 #21
We have radioactive ants in NM womanofthehills Apr 2016 #6
OH SNAP, I've been swimming in Cochiti Lake several times. Dont call me Shirley Apr 2016 #22
Be careful with those... Chan790 Apr 2016 #29
Naturally-cured pork! No candle lights needed for your next wild boar meal! Eleanors38 Apr 2016 #7
Didn't rats thrive on Christmas Island? jwirr Apr 2016 #8
Don't forget the Plezwalski horses of Chernobyl womanofthehills Apr 2016 #26
Soon, they will fly. nt awoke_in_2003 Apr 2016 #9
Boardan!! Doesn't this seem like them to many old sci-fi movies? HereSince1628 Apr 2016 #18
How's it feel to belong to a species that's more dangerous than nuclear waste? hunter Apr 2016 #10
As ye sow Orrex Apr 2016 #12
Mother Nature abhors a vacuum. Rex Apr 2016 #13
Birth control rusty fender Apr 2016 #14
Re-introduce wolves to create a complete ecosystem again? NickB79 Apr 2016 #15
... but then you'd have radioactive wolves to contend with. surrealAmerican Apr 2016 #23
The article did say the reason the boars were problematic was they destroy crops NickB79 Apr 2016 #24
yeah if only all the humans would die hfojvt Apr 2016 #17
Nature never asks. Humans have choices. hunter Apr 2016 #19
Right, so the only choices are all humans die or protect wildlife? FLPanhandle Apr 2016 #20
is a gop debate set up there? ksick trump and cruz seem to be in town dembotoz Apr 2016 #25
Two birds one stone time SwankyXomb Apr 2016 #27
I hear they're wonderful pets. Heeeeers Johnny Apr 2016 #28
 

packman

(16,296 posts)
1. Knowing the culture for pork and exotic foods/dangerous foods
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 02:40 PM
Apr 2016

I would expect Glowing Pig Bacon to be on a Japanese menu soon.

2naSalit

(86,743 posts)
3. Indeed.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 03:06 PM
Apr 2016
Says a lot for our species that a radioactive waste land is better for wildlife than human beings are.


Nitram

(22,845 posts)
4. True, it is ironic. Or is that Ionic?
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 03:17 PM
Apr 2016

I doubt boars live long enough to die of cancer contracted from exposure to radiation.

2naSalit

(86,743 posts)
11. It only takes a little while
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 10:18 PM
Apr 2016

to die from extreme exposure, when a animal has a life span of 15 - 20 years, that's plenty of time to get cancer in a continuous exposure environment.

Nitram

(22,845 posts)
16. It depends on the level of the radiation.
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 02:52 PM
Apr 2016

What would be considered dangerous to a human in terms of developing cancer later might be relatively harmless to an organism with a shorter lifespan.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
29. Be careful with those...
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 07:56 PM
Apr 2016

these started out as mere radioactive ants.


(Giant Fire Ants from Fallout: New Vegas, one of my favorite video games.)

hunter

(38,322 posts)
10. How's it feel to belong to a species that's more dangerous than nuclear waste?
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 07:44 PM
Apr 2016

All in all, I'd rather live in van in the evacuation zone of the Fukushima power plant than some war zone in Syria.

How is it that humans can do amazing things on one hand like landing rockets on barges or building space stations, and on the other hand be blowing one another up because we disagree about gods and ideologies?

And why can't we leave enough of the planet alone that we don't crowd or poison other species to extinction?


NickB79

(19,257 posts)
15. Re-introduce wolves to create a complete ecosystem again?
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 11:22 AM
Apr 2016

Wolves were native to the islands until they were wiped out a few hundred years ago.

surrealAmerican

(11,362 posts)
23. ... but then you'd have radioactive wolves to contend with.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 07:25 AM
Apr 2016

"Radioactive wolves" might be a great band name, but would radioactive wolves be less problematic than radioactive boars? I guess there'd be fewer of them, but they do range farther.

NickB79

(19,257 posts)
24. The article did say the reason the boars were problematic was they destroy crops
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 08:48 AM
Apr 2016

And you wouldn't have that problem with wolves. The fact they're radioactive really has nothing to do with the damage they're doing.

Although it's possible the wolves would develop a taste for livestock over time once they got the pigs under control, then you may have to cull the wolf packs from time to time.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
17. yeah if only all the humans would die
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 03:01 PM
Apr 2016

so the pigs and cows and bears could have the planet to themselves.

hunter

(38,322 posts)
19. Nature never asks. Humans have choices.
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 09:26 PM
Apr 2016

The choices we humans make are causing a mass extinction event, soon coming to a neighborhood near you.

Anyways, it's a hell of a thing to witness, like a smoker learning they've got lung cancer.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Radioactive Boar Are Thri...