Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,072 posts)
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 08:22 AM Apr 2016

TPM: A Hamstrung SCOTUS Is About To Have A Mess Of Voting Lawsuits At Its Doorstep


A Hamstrung SCOTUS Is About To Have A Mess Of Voting Lawsuits At Its Doorstep
ByTierney Sneed
Published April 11, 2016, 6:00 AM EDT


The signs that the Supreme Court is grappling with a depleted bench are starting to show. But what has been a trickle of tie-votes, bizarre orders and slowed activity could turn into a series of orders with contradictory effects as the court is confronted with an onslaught of election-related litigation in the lead-up to Nov. 8.

As the last stop for lawsuits challenging voting restrictions and administrative practices, the Supreme Court would normally see an increase in those cases as the 2016 election draws closer. But the ideologically split court will be facing more than the usual uptick in requests for the justices to intervene in legal battles over voting laws. The 2016 election marks the first presidential election since the Supreme Court crippled the Voting Rights Act and ushered in a wave of voting restrictions now tied up in lawsuits.

The Supreme Court will be without its decisive ninth vote just as voting rights advocates will be asking it to come to terms with its 2013 Shelby County v. Holder decision.

“There’s a lot of uncertainty in the field and with a court that is not full, there's concern that that uncertainty is just going to continue,” Jennifer Clark, a counsel for the Brennan Center's Democracy Program, told TPM. “That problem is only compounded by the gutting of the Voting Rights Act, which has created this whole new landscape where nobody really knows exactly what the rules that we’re operating in are.”


more...

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/scotus-voting-lawsuits-shelby
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TPM: A Hamstrung SCOTUS Is About To Have A Mess Of Voting Lawsuits At Its Doorstep (Original Post) babylonsister Apr 2016 OP
The Roberts Court will go down in history for it's fecklessness. Trust Buster Apr 2016 #1
The Roberts Court AlbertCat Apr 2016 #2
I think Roberts is a more responsible Justice than Thomas, Alito or the late Scalia. Trust Buster Apr 2016 #3
Which is not saying much, alas. FighttheFuture Apr 2016 #15
Qualifications? DRI Apr 2016 #7
Welcome to DU, but how is Sotomayor "marginal"? KamaAina Apr 2016 #16
A gift from GW McIdiot's administration ... aggiesal Apr 2016 #10
And that is exactly why the pukes are blocking the Court's operation until after the election lagomorph777 Apr 2016 #4
All part of the Big Plan PeoViejo Apr 2016 #5
Do you know where the term "Banana Republic" comes from? DetlefK Apr 2016 #8
Hmmm. Fitting. jwirr Apr 2016 #13
That was the point. PeoViejo Apr 2016 #14
It's their one and only hope. Qutzupalotl Apr 2016 #6
And there are plenty of Democrats willing to play right into their hands... Purrfessor Apr 2016 #9
It would have been worse if Scalia were still there. Kablooie Apr 2016 #11
Courts: HeartoftheMidwest Apr 2016 #12
 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
2. The Roberts Court
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 08:52 AM
Apr 2016

I still can't believe he was nominated. Approved....yes. But why even put him up there?

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
3. I think Roberts is a more responsible Justice than Thomas, Alito or the late Scalia.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 08:55 AM
Apr 2016

But, the first line in a future historical rendering of the Roberts Court will be the usurping of the Court's power by another Branch IMO.

 

DRI

(24 posts)
7. Qualifications?
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 10:21 AM
Apr 2016

If one is looking at the scholarship and experience to be a Supreme Court Justice there are only two serving on the bench that meets that criteria. Those are Ginsberg and Breyer. As much as I disliked his decisions ninety percent of the time Scalia was also one. I view Thomas, Alito, Roberts, Kennedy, Sotomayor, and Kagan as marginal and strictly political appointments.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
4. And that is exactly why the pukes are blocking the Court's operation until after the election
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 09:04 AM
Apr 2016

They figure with one more rigged election they can complete the construction of a permanent dictatorship.

 

PeoViejo

(2,178 posts)
5. All part of the Big Plan
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 09:34 AM
Apr 2016

...to turn the US into a Banana Republic.

'Family Values' and all that it entails.

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
8. Do you know where the term "Banana Republic" comes from?
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 10:22 AM
Apr 2016

It was used to refer to banana-producing countries that were effectively ruled by a big corporation by way of a corrupt and weak government.

Purrfessor

(1,188 posts)
9. And there are plenty of Democrats willing to play right into their hands...
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 10:45 AM
Apr 2016

Anyone who thinks the Supreme Court was bad prior to Scalia's death, wait until it is packed with a solid majority of justices who are right-wing zealots: Tea Partiers in robes.

But at least a GOP controlled government that time-machines America back to the 1920s will ignite the revolution.

And if people are so discouraged by this reversal and accept what has been done to them, then what?

Kablooie

(18,634 posts)
11. It would have been worse if Scalia were still there.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 11:17 AM
Apr 2016

The discrimination will be allowed to stand either way but if the court is split at least the issue can be brought up again later. If a majority voted to let it stand it would be settled law.

HeartoftheMidwest

(309 posts)
12. Courts:
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 11:19 AM
Apr 2016

".. gutting of the Voting Rights Act, which has created this whole new landscape where nobody really knows exactly what the rules that we’re operating in are.”

Feature, not bug.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»TPM: A Hamstrung SCOTUS ...