General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Uber for women" - What do female DUers think about this? (Men can post too ;)
"A new Boston-area startup hopes to be a new on-demand ride service that will only offer rides to women, and children of any gender under 13."
http://arstechnica.com/business/2016/04/chariot-for-women-an-uber-like-service-for-females-set-to-launch-this-month/
I am a married man, my wife really likes this idea and hopes to use it ASAP. She said she will feel safer knowing its a female driver that will pick her up.
I had some initial skepticism. It seems if you wanted to pretend to be a taxi type driver in order to kidnap a woman then your first choice would be to use a system where you are guaranteed to pick up a woman every time. I've heard of sadistic male/female couples that get off on that kind of thing... think bonny and clyde but with a preference for kidnap/murder.
So what are your thoughts, female DUers? Would you feel safer using the service? Or the same? Or perhaps even less safe?
Orrex
(63,216 posts)then I'd say that this seems like a valuable service.
However, I predict that crybaby MRA types will derisively refer to this women-only service as "Boober."
It does bring up some technical questions about sexual discrimination in the work place. I don't know the laws and I really don't care since there are lots of other taxi type apps to use. "Boober" though .... my 14 year old self laughed at that one
forjusticethunders
(1,151 posts)Now, how about we get about fixing what is making this necessary to begin with?
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Also, what would the situation be for a transgender customer who wanted to ride with this service?
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)In California I know businesses do have the right to refuse service to any customer (though they better have a good reason to avoid lawsuits). It seems the reason here is strait forward, but maybe a male will order a ride and try to file a lawsuit when he is refused service.
Orrex
(63,216 posts)In fact, it's just as obvious as every time you ask some variation of that question.
As for your concerns about "discrimination," I invite you to make an appointment with your local gynecologist and then tell us how it went. And then you should probably pound on the door of the nearest women's shelter and demand that they take you in.
Demonaut
(8,919 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)The American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) had previously said members could not treat male patients except in specific circumstances, such as circumcising babies, treating transgendered patients, and helping couples overcome infertility.
However, opposition had mounted from gynecologists and others who said the policy interfered with medical research and prevented them treating male patients with chronic pelvic pain.
Some obstetricians and gynecologists had also been treating men for cancer, problems such as low testosterone, and cosmetic procedures including liposuction.
http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/gynecologists-treat-men-u-s-board-rules-article-1.1597928
Orrex
(63,216 posts)And what kind of welcome did you receive at the Women's Shelter?
usedtobedemgurl
(1,139 posts)I think it is sexist to believe women cannot be just as dangerous as a man. If a male or female driver has a gun, I would be equally terrified of both. That being said, I am a rape survivor so I understand there may be expanded dangers with men but couldn't a male taxi cab driver be just as dangerous? I have never had trouble with any of them.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)people who are violent... the majority of them are men. And I hate to say it, but a majority of that tiny minority tend to be violent with people they knew rather than strangers.
Otherwise things like male taxi drivers, male delivery drivers, male home inspectors/repairmen, etc would all be a grave danger to people (especially women).
It's sexist to say a woman cannot be as dangerous as a man. It isn't sexist to say the majority of violent crime is committed by men.
As for whether the service is ok or not, I don't hold strong feelings one way or the other.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)use such a service and that was an option I'd choose it.
yuiyoshida
(41,832 posts)I do know there are some trains, in Japan that have women only cars. The women feel safer traveling together but that's there, and with multiple passengers. This.. maybe. I really don't think anything could be said, until its put into practice a few months.
Demonaut
(8,919 posts)especially from Uber drivers...I know that Lyft took almost a month to complete my background check yet Uber approved me in a couple of days, not sure if Lyft is more thorough but I've heard from the female clients they prefer Lyft drivers over Uber.
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)Thanks for that insight. Are lyft and uber prices the same? We have only used uber so far
Demonaut
(8,919 posts)MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)"I do not care the gender of my driver"
Picky people would of course need to wait longer or perhaps not able to get a ride at all.