General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDeclassified CIA Document Reveals Iraq War Had Zero Justification
http://yournewswire.com/declassified-cia-document-reveals-iraq-war-had-zero-justification/Now that document has been declassified and it reveals that there was virtually zero justification for the Iraq war. The document reveals that there was no operational tie between Saddam and al Qaeda and no WMD programs.
The report reveals that the intelligence community and the US Department of Energy did not think Saddam was pursuing any type of WMD program, and was instead developing rocket motors....
An example of that: According to the newly declassified NIE, the intelligence community concluded that Iraq probably has renovated a (vaccine) production plant to manufacture biological weapons but we are unable to determine whether (biological weapons) agent research has resumed. The NIE also said Hussein did not have sufficient material to manufacture any nuclear weapons. But in an October 7, 2002 speech in Cincinnati, Ohio, then-President George W. Bush simply said Iraq, possesses and produces chemical and biological weapons and the evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program.
Solly Mack
(90,787 posts)That said, let us all recall how Bush blamed the bad intel he got for his actions.
Bush lied. People Died - and the CIA is absolutely no better.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)The CIA is SIGNIFICANTLY worse. Even while his dad was running it.
Shitty shitty people.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)If she did then she along with everyone else who read it in the Bush admin and Congress should be tried for treason right?
TM99
(8,352 posts)trust Bush Co. Not only did she trust them, she parroted every last one of their talking points in her Senate floor support speech before voting for this abomination.
If she see it and voted as she did, she is a neocon. Period.
If she did not see it and voted for it out of trust for Bush Co's lies, then she is too stupid, naive, and of such poor judgement to be qualified for the position of president.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)"But if Clintons claim that I had acted in good faith passes muster, her assertion that she made the best decision I could with the information I had does not. Prior to Clintons October 10, 2002 speech from the Senate floor explaining her Iraq vote, the Bush administration sent over two documents to the Senate for review. The first was a 92-page, classified National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Iraqs weapons of mass destruction (WMD). The second was a five-page, unclassified version."
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/06/whats-missing-from-hillary-clintons-iraq-war-apology/372427/
Martin Eden
(12,875 posts)She was either on board with the neocon agenda or she made a cold calculation that being a hawk in the post-9/11 environment was better for her political ambitions.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)The Clinton's use their famous triangulation all the time. That was one of those times. She figured she had nothing to lose and everything to win.
Be supportive of the war because she was the Senator from New York after 9/11 and be popular for that and also being able to claim she was duped by the Bush Administration if she turned out to be wrong. That's triangulation.
Not stupid at all, but definitely a politician through and through. Capitalizing on everything to the best personal advantage no matter what the fallout is. Always a win-win.
Martin Eden
(12,875 posts)That kind of political calculation is a big reason why our government fails to serve the interests of the American people.
It is up to us, the voting public, to make triangulation a losing strategy instead of a "win-win."
lunatica
(53,410 posts)If it weren't for Bernie I would be supporting Hillary because she would be the only option, and I always vote even if it's only to nullify a Republican vote. but frankly I'm tired of the status quo in politics. I'm more than tired. I'm sick of it. To be forced to face a future of more of the same is really depressing.
Jackilope
(819 posts)It's long overdue to vote the Corporatists out.
Solly Mack
(90,787 posts)malaise
(269,188 posts)+1,000
Solly Mack
(90,787 posts)and always with good reason.
malaise
(269,188 posts)barbtries
(28,811 posts)from before day 1.
Solly Mack
(90,787 posts)Martin Eden
(12,875 posts)I wrote my congresscritters before the IWR, urging them to vote against it.
I went to my local Chicago anti-war protest in Feb 2003, where I heard a relative unknown named Barack Obama speak against it.
I travelled to our nation's capital for the protest on Mar 15, 4 days before shock&awe.
When this war crime was launched I had never in my entire life been so ashamed of my country or so bitterly disappointed in the Democratic leadership. I suppose Vietnam under LBJ was just as bad or worse, but I was just a kid in the mid 1960's.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)people that the intelligence was flawed.
Dustlawyer
(10,497 posts)But we should remember what Obama said after taking office, "Look forward, not back!" I am pretty sure HE saw this document!
Do you think Obama wanted to set a precedent to protect him down the road?
DemocracyDirect
(708 posts)Just wondering if you know.
Dustlawyer
(10,497 posts)2naSalit
(86,804 posts)But it's good for us to be
A) reminded of these facts
B) show the reinforced info to show that what was a lie then is still a lie now that has grown into a pariah of global range.
C) So we never forget what a stolen election brought us.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)It's a status quo thing not a party thing.
Actor
(626 posts)they would do to him if he did something about this?
JanMichael
(24,893 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Democat
(11,617 posts)Get over that idea because it will never happen.
Neither Sanders nor Clinton will go after Bush either.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Sen. Bob Grahams floor statement urging his fellow Senators to read the full classifed NIE. Here is Sen. Grahams statement:
Friends, I encourage you to read the classified intelligence reports which are much sharper than what is available in declassified form, Sen. Graham reports stating on the floor of the Senate in October 2002.
We are going to be increasing the threat level against the people of the United States. He warned: Blood is going to be on your hands.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-boyce/the-iraq-war-vote-was-694_1_b_50742.html
Martin Eden
(12,875 posts)I was here at DU in 2002, and we knew the case for war was built on a deliberate campaign of deceit.
I vowed then to never, ever, support a candidate in a Democratic primary who voted for the IWR.
We predicted it would be a fiasco, but the consequences are even worse than anticipated.
lark
(23,158 posts)Bush, Cheney, Rummie will pay for their murdering, Middle East destabilizing, lying, cheating, self serving ways. Cheney, especially, is guilty of enriching himself at America's expense. His net worth went up 400% due to the government using his company without requiring competitive bids. Hell, they even changed the law first thing upon taking office, so that Halliburton could get government contracts that they'd previously been banned from due to their being caught cheating the government so many times previously.
That they did this purely and knowingly for personal and political gain just makes it 10x worse.
Martin Eden
(12,875 posts)Until these war criminals are indicted and prosecuted, it most certainly is not.
lark
(23,158 posts)We are not a national of law and rules, we are a corportacrcy, for and of the 1%. Everyone else doesn't matter, we are nothing to them. Bush/Cheney made the 1% a lot of $$, so they are totally safe from the true charges of being traitors.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)The MIC, Dick Cheney, and Erik "on the run" Prince needed a huge pay day!
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Of course, it's no surprise,
How's it playing in the corporate media?
AxionExcel
(755 posts)...and fattened the wallets of their godforsaken military-industrial complex (R).
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)war, some indirectly (i.e., campaign donations from MIC corps).
vkkv
(3,384 posts)Hoppy
(3,595 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)I wonder why they are letting this out now. Looks like another smoke screen to me. The criminality of the Iraq War isn't going anywhere.
Look to present day events for another even greater criminal government act taking place right now under our nose.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Oh well, nevermind. Water under the bridge. Looking backwards to the past, when we should be looking forward to the future. We'll get it right next time. No harm, no foul, right? You guys aren't going to get all snitty about the colossal waste of money, materiel and lives are you? Anybody can make a teensy-weensy mistake, you know. It's not like you guys are all perfect. Keep bringing this up, and you know what that makes you? You're the real war mongers!
Nay
(12,051 posts)again. You'd think the populace would catch on, but the veils of illusion are so easily pulled over ignorant faces.
chknltl
(10,558 posts)...but those German citizens, they were under a dictatorship instead of a democracy. We knew Bush and the BFEE lied, well many of us here did....now we ALL know that he lied! I have said these words before and I pop will say them till my last day: IMPEACH BUSH!
Victor_c3
(3,557 posts)I guess the joke was on me, my fellow soldiers, and the Iraqi people!
When I deployed to Iraq in February 2004 wee were still supposedly on the lookout for weapons of mass destruction. I remember it became a joke with me and my fellow platoon leaders in my unit. We were going to find the WMDs! We knew it!! Then about August 2004 we had to turn in all of our chemical protective gear. Which, I thought was very telling of what my chain of command thought about the chances of us finding WMD.
Hey, they got me good with their joke. I've been considered totally and permanately disabled from PTSD since about two years ago after a pretty nasty suicide attempt. The war and its after effects have been slowly destroying everything in my life since 2004. It's nice to know that when I joined the army in 1997 as a naive kid with idea that I'd be fighting to make the world a better place that I was completely taken for a fool by the politicians and leaders appointed over me. Yup, they got me good.
Then people wonder why I, under no circumstance, will vote for a politician who supported that war and then took until about a year ago to realize that it was a mistake. We were all taken for fools by these sorts of politicians and some of have paid more of a price than others. Anybody who ever supported that war should be shunned from public life and never hold any sort of position of power again. At least bush 43 has done a mostly decent job of that for the last 8 years. I wish the rest would follow his example.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)Martin Eden
(12,875 posts)... on cars driven by flag-waving armchair warriors rooting for this war?
I would call it a supreme irony, but the tragedy is too great. A better word is needed.
sorefeet
(1,241 posts)will press charges when more papers are released and they have no choice but expose the truth to the entire world. I hope Dicks new heart hangs in there to see him found guilty. These people are war criminals and will be dealt with, but not by America. We aren't honest enough.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)Javaman
(62,534 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)war and $$$$$$$$$$$ for the MIC - Plenty of Justification - and she knew
turbinetree
(24,720 posts)The pattern of hypocrisy is amazing.............................this is what happens when a media, if they did there job, would have reminded the public of this lie, to see how the "same players" had there hands in both pies so to speak.
Then the public would have had the opportunity to say, like many of us, did, say heh, what about this, they are not different, look who's at the defense department in 1990-----------------the media should have been hammering these hypocrites, for facts.................................
Honk-----------------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016
Rex
(65,616 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)think
(11,641 posts)What a different world this would be. Instead that opportunity was lost on a war based on lies....
tecelote
(5,122 posts)Doctors, Teachers and Engineers.
Win over hearts and minds instead of blowing them up.
ananda
(28,878 posts)..
erlewyne
(1,115 posts)knew, 13 years ago that the " Iraq War Had Zero Justification".
I told all my friends the same. Today, nobody cares. It does not
make any difference.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Washingtons Blog, Oct. 7, 2010
EXCERPT...
Prosecuting government officials risks a cycle of criminalizing public service, (Sunstein) argued, and Democrats should avoid replicating retributive efforts like the impeachment of President Clinton or even the slight appearance of it.
SOURCE w links n details: http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2010/10/main-obama-adviser-blocking-prosecution.html?m=1
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)THIS^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+1
Rex
(65,616 posts)I don't think hiding out in America will be enough this time, everyone wants a piece of the BFEE now. We all knew this shoe would drop, just like the Panama Papers during the TPP. Torture was just one thing on the menu. Lies and illegality the cake. Malfeasance.
EDIT - this will be big, a little birdie told me the PP is just the first leak. During social unrest and austerity. Could cause some governments to collapse. Venezuela is in freefall do to the bottom falling out on a barrel of oil and so goes the house of cards.
The fact that the part about America, namely the who is who among billionaires is being vetted right now must mean panic in the ownership.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)maggies farm
(79 posts)Obama too.
Any sane person have proof to argue otherwise?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Which isn't exactly helping her case.
robertgodardfromnj
(67 posts)It's unfortunate that so many people in America don't get that the Iraq War was unjustifiable. I blame Faux and the RW media for this mess.
AllyCat
(16,231 posts)A little part of hope that maybe there was a reason all those people died and were maimed.
JohnyCanuck
(9,922 posts)April 14, 2016 Robert Parry, Consortium News
SNIP
After all, the U.S. government rarely corrects its misstatements and outright lies, no matter how significant they may be. For instance, theres never been a formal admission that the Gulf of Tonkin claims, which launched the Vietnam War, were false.
On a smaller scale, I encountered something similar when I was covering the U.S. invasion of Grenada in 1983. The Reagan administration massively exaggerated the discovery of some useless World War I era rifles in a musty-smelling warehouse to claim that the little Caribbean island was about to be transformed into the hub of terrorism for the Western Hemisphere.
As absurd as the claim was, it worked well enough amid a well-staged propaganda campaign complete with American students kissing the tarmac when they returned to the United States and members of Congress waving around some Grenada government contracts in Russian.
Dig in the Heels
We are now seeing similar dig-in-the-heels strategies regarding Syria and Ukraine. Though Im told that U.S. intelligence knows that the Obama administrations propaganda is no longer operative on the 2013 sarin gas attack outside Damascus and the 2014 shoot-down of the Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 in eastern Ukraine, the storylines wont be retracted or corrected.
https://consortiumnews.com/2016/04/14/the-credibility-illusion/
pangaia
(24,324 posts)I remember well the day it suddenly hit me.. "Shit, they are actually going do this!" it may have been as early as late 2002, certainly VERY EARLY 2003..
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)"I got pallets full of justifications, here, buddy!"
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)in launching a war that destroyed Iraq for sure and most likely destroyed the USofA.
Brother Buzz
(36,469 posts)That is, if they made an effort to go down to 'Read only' classified repository in the basement.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)question.
valerief
(53,235 posts)is done.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)wade in the shit your leader helped create?
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)back then?
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)That it's one that has an answer.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)And we are talking 92 pages - was written so that whoever was doing the executive summary presentation would have their ass covered.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)"But if Clintons claim that I had acted in good faith passes muster, her assertion that she made the best decision I could with the information I had does not. Prior to Clintons October 10, 2002 speech from the Senate floor explaining her Iraq vote, the Bush administration sent over two documents to the Senate for review. The first was a 92-page, classified National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Iraqs weapons of mass destruction (WMD). The second was a five-page, unclassified version."
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/06/whats-missing-from-hillary-clintons-iraq-war-apology/372427/
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)Egnever
(21,506 posts)But trusted bush instead.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)the obvious. I knew this from day one, cynic that I am.
Uncle Joe
(58,426 posts)Thanks for the thread, KamaAina.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)
..was directly readable by all those Senators who voted to support this damn war?
I'm sure Feinstein saw it because she's on the intelligence Committee. Did HRC see it?
benld74
(9,910 posts)There was NO justification!!
shadowmayor
(1,325 posts)Absolutely none of this would have been possible if we had a real, truth-seeking media in this nation. Yes, some of the alternate media sources were on this from the beginning but the network TV stations, major newspapers and radio stations were all part of the Cheney disinformation campaign. What a travesty. Spoke to a co-worker today who couldn't believe that Iraq wasn't responsible for 9-11. Wonder why?
roamer65
(36,747 posts)Mira
(22,380 posts)allan01
(1,950 posts)Triana
(22,666 posts)voted FOR the Iraq war? I remember those days here on DU. MANY of us - even without her level of access, KNEW the entire thing was based on LIES and that there was NO damn reason to invade & occupy Iraq.
This is only proof that we were right. And that HRC in this instance showed very poor judgement.
lindysalsagal
(20,733 posts)Never.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Knowing a massacre was coming, for no reason, and there was nothing they could do about it except kiss their loved ones good bye.
The international criminal court needs to prosecute Cheney and Bush
Rex
(65,616 posts)PNAC alive and well.
joanbarnes
(1,723 posts)progressoid
(49,999 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I never post in all caps. I opted to this time.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Col. Westhusing was in charge of training the new Iraqi army and overseeing civilian contractors.
He is remembered as a good man, a brilliant man who followed the Cadet Code:
"I will not lie, cheat, or steal, or tolerate those who do.
Col. Westhusing was the Army's chief ethicist and someone who suspected something was wrong with David Petraeus, way back when. Then, just when he was about to come home to his loving wife and family, he became a suicide.
Is David Petraeus Dirty? Ted Westheusing Said So, and Then He Shot Himself
By Melina Hussein Ripcoco, Brilliant at Breakfast
Alternet.org
April 8, 2008
Ted Westhusing, was a champion basketball player at Jenks High School in Tulsa Oklahoma. A driven kid with a strong work ethic, he would show up at the gym at 7AM to throw 100 practice shots before school. He was driven academically too, becoming a National Merritt Scholarship finalist. His career through West Point and straight into overseas service was sterling, and by 2000 he had enrolled in Emory University to earn his doctorate in Philosophy. His dissertation was on honor and the ethics of war, with the opening containing the following passage: "Born to be a warrior, I desire these answers not just for philosophical reasons, but for self-knowledge." Would that all military commanders took such an interest in the study of ethics and morality and what our conduct in times of war says about our development as human beings. Would that any educational system in this country taught ethics, decision making, or even political science that's not part of an advanced degree anymore.
Ted Westhusing, the soldier, philosopher and ethicist, was given a guaranteed lifetime teaching position and West Point by the time he had finished with his service and his education. he felt like he could do more for his country by trying to shape the minds coming out of the academy that were the ones that would be military commanders. He had settled into that life with his wife and kids, when in 2004 he volunteered for active duty in Iraq, feeling like the experience would help his teaching. He had missed combat in his active duty and it seemed like an important piece for someone who not only philosophized about war, but who was also preparing the military's future leaders.
But more than that, he was sure that the Iraq mission was a just one; he supported the cause and he bought the information that was put in front of him. Considering that vials of powder were being tossed around hearings by the highest level of military commanders how could he not? This was a man who was so steeped in the patriotism of idealistic military fervor that he barely could fit in regular society. His whole being was dedicated to this path, and he was proud to serve his country.
Once in Iraq, he found himself straddling the fence between a questioning philosopher and an unquestioning soldier. Westhusing had thought he was freeing a country in bondage, keeping America safe from a horrible threat, and spreading democracy to a grateful people. But the reality of what was happening in this out of control war was too much for him. His mission was to oversee one of the most important tasks left from the war; retraining the Iraqi military by overseeing the private contractors that had been put in charge of it.
As the assignment went on he found that everywhere he looked he was seeing corrupt contractors doing shoddy work, abusing people, and stealing from the government. These contractors were being paid to do many of the jobs that would normally be done by a regulated military, and they bore out the worst fears of those who don't believe in outsourcing such vital work. He responded to the corruption that he saw by reporting the problems up the line, but the response from his commanding officers was disappointing. He had, for much of his career, idolized military commanders, and in that assignment he found himself with some of the military's most famous faces, doing the most important job, but he was terribly disappointed and alarmed to realize that they were greedy and corrupt themselves.
CONTINUED...
http://www.alternet.org/story/81678/is_david_petraeus_dirty_ted_westhusing_said_so,_and_then_he_shot_himself
COMPLETE ORIGINAL ARTICLE: http://www.ripcoco.com/2008/04/is-david-petraeus-dirty-ted-westheusing.html
Gee. What kind of person would make money off war?
PS: I like caps in my notes, too, DisgustipatedinCA. makes it easier to find key players. FBI's Hoover, too, liked them. Wish they'd go after the traitors who LIED AMERICA INTO WAR.
Overseas
(12,121 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Alkene
(752 posts)with our exceptional and sacred national interests.
Iraq's decision to change payment for its oil from dollars to euros was the reason for the US invasion.
It's common knowledge.
And had he submitted to the jackals and hit men, we wouldn't have needed to share our democratic values with Iraq.
Its important for us not to feel too sanctimonious in retrospect about the tough job those folks had, in propping up the otherwise worthless petrodollar.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Because that would change a whole lot about how much the yes-voters deserve to be excused for their grave error of judgement.
DemocracyDirect
(708 posts)I suspect many read only the executive summary though that was cherry picked.
People who come up with the wrong answers reliably can be very valuable.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)do her due diligence on matters of life and death. Shame on her.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)rafeh1
(385 posts)Always talk about taking responsibility.
Yet after blowing $1000+ billion
Thousands of american lives
Millions of iraqi lives
Rise of isis criminals
The right wing whiner losers blame obama and liberals and muslims. Anyone but their own sorry asses.
Nay
(12,051 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)going into Iraq was still the right thing to do. They may be wrong, but they're sticking with their decision.
On the other hand, there were a lot of Dems who have, after the fact, claimed "if I knew then what I know now, I wouldn't have supported the IWR"... as it turns out, they could have, and should have know it before they voted.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)it was glaringly obvious they had set their sights on it, relevance be damned. Darth Cheney wanted their oil and our "friends" in the middle east wanted Saddam gone, and no amount of our money or our soldiers was too great to advance their selfish narcissistic goals.
We may as well have invaded Canada.
DemocracyDirect
(708 posts)Well maybe if the price of oil was higher.
malthaussen
(17,217 posts)Rather, I suggest the CIA documents demonstrate that the justification for the war in Iraq was not the justification offered. Because the justifications of regime change and economic opportunity were what really drove the engine.
As ever, when discussing things like justification and accomplishment of mission, one must first define whose benefits they are adjudging.
-- Mal
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)Watching the war happen was horrifying.
Snarkoleptic
(6,002 posts)Healthcare, Education, Infrastructure, a Voting Rights Amendment....
Martin Eden
(12,875 posts)What I'd like to say to his face:
I'd tell you to go fuck yourself
But that is much too kind
Because if you could perform that feat
You'd take pleasure in your behind
I'd like to say eat shit and die
But you deserve much more
You should suffer all the grief and pain
Of your misbegotten war
Though I could never make you think
Or feel, or understand
I'll take solace when you hear your name
Cursed throughout the land
From inside a lonely prison cell
Dark and bare and cold
Where every day you pay for your crimes
Until you're sick, heartbroken, and old
Then when you finally leave the earth
You fucked over oh so well
If there is a God and afterlife
You're going straight to hell
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Possibly punk.
JEB
(4,748 posts)let's prosecute the criminals that perpetrated this heinous crime. Prosecution is the only path to redemption for our country.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Martin Eden
(12,875 posts)Nearly half the Democrats in Congress voted for the IWR and some leaders, like Hillary Clinton, echoed the Bush administration's war rhetoric.
Response to Dont call me Shirley (Reply #99)
DUbeornot2be This message was self-deleted by its author.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)of sites had this - like Mother Jones
Why doesn't cnn have it? Why isn't this on the news as the lead story
And - surely the "corporate media" can't keep this quiet - can they?
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)squelch an important story......we need to get Trump on this....he would JUMP on it if he knew.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Hotler
(11,445 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Yet they always pretend to be super duper Dems...