What would that be, 5% of the national vote?

for my prediction. With a Trump vs Clinton matchup, turnout will be WAY down and of the ones who will bother to vote, an historically augmented number will vote third party and the Greens are the best known leftish third party.

Trumpy doesn't become President. A lot of House seats seem to be in flux now too.

We get to see in a few months.

When he produced a victory for George Bush?

BTW, this is a prediction, not an advocacy.

Without the votes that went to Nader it wouldn't have even been close enough for a runoff.

from Democrats for Bush, it wouldn't even have been in question. If Hillary is the nominee and the Republicans nominate someone that sounds and looks sane, be prepared for another Republican win. There will be a lot of Democrats voting for Republicans because of Clinton fatigue.

Z

Aside from the fact that the 300000 Democrats figure is speculative bullshit, the 97000 Floridians who certainly did win the election for Bush could have voted for the environmentally conscious candidate who had a chance to win.

And that is why golf course water hazards are now considered "wetlands" by our federal government.

and would have been counted in this whole election it would not happen but the front runner chose her path and it is setting the path for an exit.

and would like a say in elections. I think we are slowly moving towards an era where there are three or more parties, and we end up forming coalitions like they do in other countries. I think that would be a good thing.

In the meantime, the Democrats embody most of the shared values of people on this forum and I think it's pretty harmful to tear it down. Look what's happened with the GOP and the Tea Party.