Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MerryBlooms

(11,770 posts)
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:47 PM Apr 2016

Treasury Decides To Put Harriet Tubman On $20 Bill

Last edited Wed Apr 20, 2016, 02:59 PM - Edit history (1)

[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]

Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew is expected to announce that he has decided to put abolitionist leader Harriet Tubman on a new $20 bill, according to a spokesman for the Treasury Department.

The decision caps a public campaign asking for the change and months of deliberation by the Treasury to either replace Alexander Hamilton on the $10 bill or Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill.

As we reported, an unofficial contest by the activist group Women on 20s gave the nod to Tubman to take Jackson's place on the $20 bill. The campaign then sent a petition to President Obama.


http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/04/20/474983292/treasury-decides-to-put-harriet-tubman-on-20-bill?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=morningedition&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20160420

Excellent choice.

eta:

Compensation for Civil War Services

In the summer of 1865 Harriet Tubman returned home to Auburn, New York from Virginia where she was serving in a hospital near Fort Monroe. Without a steady income it was difficult for Tubman to make ends meet, she was in charge of her elderly parents and constantly providing for those looking for refuge in her home. Tubman sought compensation for her services during the Civil War which turned into a 34 year ordeal. Because her services as a nurse, cook, spy and scout were not documented compensation was hard to get. All Tubman had received was $200 for 3 years of service.

In 1865 she appealed to the federal government for the first time and then a second time in 1867. Influential friends and community leaders published letters in newspapers advocating for Tubman’s case, she deserved a veteran’s pension.

An Auburn banker named Charles P. Wood prepared a detailed account and documentation of Tubman’s war service and military assignments. It was given to Congress but it lacked official documents. This document took years to make it to the top decision maker. In 1874 New York Congressman, Mc Dougall, pressed the issue in Congress. Tubman’s bill H.R. 2711 for $2000 passed the House but was struck at the Senate for lack of documentation.

In 1890, two years after her second husband, Nelson Davis, died a law was passed under which Tubman was eligible to receive a war veteran widow’s pension of $8 a month. Nelson Davis served as Private Nelson Charles in Company G, Eighth United States Colored Infantry from September 25, 1863 to November 10, 1865. For the first time in her life Harriet Tubman had a steady and reliable income. However the application for her services in the civil war was struck in the bureaucracy pipeline.


http://www.harriet-tubman.org/compensation-for-civil-war-services/
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Treasury Decides To Put Harriet Tubman On $20 Bill (Original Post) MerryBlooms Apr 2016 OP
Awesome REP Apr 2016 #1
I honestly didn't believe there would be a change. MerryBlooms Apr 2016 #5
K&R! About time. octoberlib Apr 2016 #2
Indeed MerryBlooms Apr 2016 #6
The PERFECT Choice to Erase that Fucking Racist Asshole from Our Money! hrc guy Apr 2016 #3
Yes, definitely a good for bad. I'm glad. Hortensis Apr 2016 #8
Amen! Chiquitita Apr 2016 #18
Long overdue and most welcome CanonRay Apr 2016 #4
Yes, I totally agree. MerryBlooms Apr 2016 #7
+1,000 malaise Apr 2016 #9
What a good choice! WHEN CRABS ROAR Apr 2016 #10
The PERFECT choice... gregcrawford Apr 2016 #11
Let's listen to Holly and Ronnie! struggle4progress Apr 2016 #12
Well that's bound to piss off the Donald Trump wing of the GOP. progressoid Apr 2016 #13
I'm sure there are horrid remarks in every comment section in every site covering the story. MerryBlooms Apr 2016 #24
Excellent. nt msanthrope Apr 2016 #14
That's a good thing. aikoaiko Apr 2016 #15
Most excellent news! I'll be looking forward to seeing the design. nt ladyVet Apr 2016 #16
Me too. I hope they publish all the designs for us before they choose. MerryBlooms Apr 2016 #25
I just read that it won't be until 2030, which I think is bullshit LynneSin Apr 2016 #17
Serious BS homegirl Apr 2016 #28
Agree! maddiemom Apr 2016 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author maddiemom Apr 2016 #34
I've been meaning to ask for years... maddiemom Apr 2016 #35
Something to do with the way they implement the security features davidn3600 Apr 2016 #36
K&R! stonecutter357 Apr 2016 #19
Best News This Year. EOM Scruffy1 Apr 2016 #20
That is so cool - and even better for her to be on the 20! n/t trotsky Apr 2016 #21
i am VERY OK w/ suffragettes being on the REVERSE of the $10. it was NOT just 1 WOMAN. pansypoo53219 Apr 2016 #22
... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2016 #29
About fucking time. Half-Century Man Apr 2016 #23
Harriet Tubman is a great choice. PatrickforO Apr 2016 #26
Oh yes, for sure! MerryBlooms Apr 2016 #27
I'm totally in agreement! lunatica Apr 2016 #30
Me too, and SO overdue. I would love to see MerryBlooms Apr 2016 #31
YES! maddiemom Apr 2016 #32
As much as I admire Harriet Tubman she was a Republican. I'm not sure replacing the only Democrat on Akicita Apr 2016 #37
The Republican Party was a completely different entity under Lincoln. roamer65 Apr 2016 #41
It was very, very corrupt under Grant. He was a horrible president. I don't know how he got on our Akicita Apr 2016 #43
K&R Jeffersons Ghost Apr 2016 #38
And there is a NEW denomination bill coming out as well. RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #39
Recently heard: Tubman on the front and Jackson on the back.... are you kidding me? YOHABLO Apr 2016 #40
Heard a Jerk Call Into NPR the Other Day.... usedtobedemgurl Apr 2016 #42

REP

(21,691 posts)
1. Awesome
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:56 PM
Apr 2016

My first choice was Wilma Mankiller - so appropriate to replace Jackson - Tubman was my very close next choice. It will be great to have the face of such great courage seen daily!

MerryBlooms

(11,770 posts)
5. I honestly didn't believe there would be a change.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 03:02 PM
Apr 2016

I'm delighted with the choice and happy that I was wrong.

gregcrawford

(2,382 posts)
11. The PERFECT choice...
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 03:42 PM
Apr 2016

... to replace a bigoted, genocidal asshole of a president. Hail Ms.Tubman!

Sadly, there will be some lower life forms from the shallow end of the gene pool that will refuse to use the new twenties, whaddya bet?

MerryBlooms

(11,770 posts)
25. Me too. I hope they publish all the designs for us before they choose.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 05:51 PM
Apr 2016

It's a long process, but I'm very excited.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
17. I just read that it won't be until 2030, which I think is bullshit
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 04:03 PM
Apr 2016

I mean seriously, do we have some sort of contract that says we have to keep Jackson on the $20 until 2029? I mean we are finally doing something really amazing with putting not just a woman but a woman of color on our currency but we have to wait another 14 years until we actually see it.

Seriously BULLSHIT!

homegirl

(1,429 posts)
28. Serious BS
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:02 AM
Apr 2016

INDEED. This change to the $20 should be released in 2020 to celebrate the 100th Anniversary of the passage of the 19th Amendment.

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
33. Agree!
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 04:17 PM
Apr 2016

I'll (hopefully) be in my eighties by 2030. I'd love to see it before then. And that's not to deny "Old Hickory" bills floating around for years to come.

Response to LynneSin (Reply #17)

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
36. Something to do with the way they implement the security features
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 04:54 PM
Apr 2016

I remember it being talked about last year. Before a new bill is released, it goes through a complex process.

It's like a rotation. And it is done a certain way so that new technology is being continuously added to the bills. It's said to be done this way to help stay ahead of counterfeiters.

And it's not just the Treasury Department that has a say when the bills are issued, it's the Federal Reserve too, and also the Secret Service. And I don't see those entities speeding up the rotation just for political purposes.

The good news is the new version of the $10 bill will probably be out around 2020.

pansypoo53219

(20,978 posts)
22. i am VERY OK w/ suffragettes being on the REVERSE of the $10. it was NOT just 1 WOMAN.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 04:50 PM
Apr 2016

it is NOT a back. it is the REVERSE. grow up. i WANNA see a suffragette SCENE.

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
23. About fucking time.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 04:56 PM
Apr 2016

Absolutely no excuse as to why it took so long.

Next put Tȟašúŋke Witkó (Crazy Horse) on the Fifty.
Put Dread Scott on the Quarter, to remind us African Americans are not partially anything.

MerryBlooms

(11,770 posts)
31. Me too, and SO overdue. I would love to see
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 05:59 PM
Apr 2016

our currency reflect the amazing diversity of our American heroes.

Times they are a changin', and this is a great opportunity for us to push for our currency to reflect our true, but often omitted, American history.

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
32. YES!
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 04:11 PM
Apr 2016

Harriet Tubman was one of the very few black women that I'd heard of historically. Until now, I'd never learned of all of her amazing causes and accomplishments. There are many accomplished white women, but in comparison to Tubman they call to mind the old Fred Astaire/Ginger Rogers evaluation, "She did everything he did, but backwards and in high heels." Currency tribute is long overdue for both a female and a Black person. Harriet Tubman is an inspired choice.

Akicita

(1,196 posts)
37. As much as I admire Harriet Tubman she was a Republican. I'm not sure replacing the only Democrat on
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 09:48 PM
Apr 2016

our paper money with another Republican is a good idea. Along with Grant and Lincoln that would make three Republicans and zero Democrats if Jackson is removed.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
41. The Republican Party was a completely different entity under Lincoln.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 10:10 AM
Apr 2016

Definitely not defending it, but it stood for much more progressive ideas back then than it does even now.

Akicita

(1,196 posts)
43. It was very, very corrupt under Grant. He was a horrible president. I don't know how he got on our
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:16 PM
Apr 2016

money. Must have been for his soldiering. He was good at that.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
39. And there is a NEW denomination bill coming out as well.
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:16 PM
Apr 2016

The new $7.50 bill will feature a picture of Sarah Palin on the front, and Ben Carson on the back.

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
40. Recently heard: Tubman on the front and Jackson on the back.... are you kidding me?
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 11:45 PM
Apr 2016

What an insult to put a former slave and a man who owned slaves and committed genocide on native Americans, on the same bill. That's ridiculous. Let's take all former slave owners off the bills, say George Washington (?)

usedtobedemgurl

(1,139 posts)
42. Heard a Jerk Call Into NPR the Other Day....
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 10:19 AM
Apr 2016

He said he would not be accepting $5 or $20 bills as change when the new bills are issued. He said what she did was against the law and how he would not be using anything from a criminal. No matter how the host tried to talk to him, the guy would hear none of it. The thing is, this is legal tender. If I was a store and the guy would not accept my legal tender, I would just say goodbye to him and let him call the cops. Let him try and explain to the cops why he does not have to accept anything legal. Honestly, it is just a way to hide behind the guy's prejudice's.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Treasury Decides To Put H...