General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWTF??? What's the deal? Do they think a woman can't handle it?
Why is there a need for a man to be on the back of Harriet Tubman's twenty?
Andrew Jackson gets moved to the back and the new girl gets the front?
How about we get the slave owner off the bill entirely? Is that too much to ask . . . . . . or is that the price to get a woman of color on the front?
That's just ridiculous.
Skittles
(153,164 posts)specifically, that she wasn't smiling
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)generals of that era, we shouldn't put slaves from the era on money either..." Makes total sense...
Orrex
(63,213 posts)I mean, look at Honest Abe's big, toothy grin right there on the five-spot.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)Does anyone on any money smile?
alarimer
(16,245 posts)And why was it even necessary to keep Jackson at all? Women are second-class citizens, even on the currency.
Skittles
(153,164 posts)a black woman would be equal to a while man, and that cannot be
So Far From Heaven
(354 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)Agree with your post, but the wording...
Stinky The Clown
(67,801 posts)Lighten up just a little. We're on the same side. The writing style should have been a clue for you.