Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,691 posts)
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 07:02 PM Apr 2016

The Voting Effect of Virginia’s Move on Felons? Small but Potentially Decisive

The Voting Effect of Virginia’s Move on Felons? Small but Potentially Decisive

by Nate Cohn at the NY Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/23/upshot/the-voting-effect-of-virginias-move-on-felons-surprisingly-small.html?_r=0

"SNIP............


There was considerable fretting — or satisfaction — over Gov. Terry McAuliffe’s decision Friday to re-enfranchise 200,000 ex-felons in Virginia.

The state will be one of the central battlegrounds this November, and it is widely believed that ex-felons will vote heavily for Democrats. (More than half are African-Americans, a big voting bloc for the party.) And the big number of newly enfranchised voters is actually larger than Mr. Obama’s 149,298-vote margin of victory there in 2012.

But the electoral effect of felon re-enfranchisement is likely to be modest. The best-case scenario for Democrats might be that they improve their popular vote margin by a half-point. That’s a big deal, but only in a close election.

The reason is deceptively straightforward. Ex-felons are less likely to vote than nonfelons, even when ex-felons are eligible to vote.



.............SNIP"
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Voting Effect of Virginia’s Move on Felons? Small but Potentially Decisive (Original Post) applegrove Apr 2016 OP
I suspect that... Wounded Bear Apr 2016 #1
Exactly. Many're sure to regard it solely as corruption. Hortensis Apr 2016 #2
The former Gov Bob McDonnell actually reinsted rights to a lot of ex-felons underpants Apr 2016 #3

Wounded Bear

(58,670 posts)
1. I suspect that...
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 07:07 PM
Apr 2016

the potential increase in Dem voters would be offset, more or less, by the motivational effect on Repubs who will vote against such progressive actions.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
2. Exactly. Many're sure to regard it solely as corruption.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 07:13 PM
Apr 2016

Others as a mixture of self-serving corruption and typical liberal moral deficiency and that ol' bleeding heart preference for criminals over good people.

underpants

(182,829 posts)
3. The former Gov Bob McDonnell actually reinsted rights to a lot of ex-felons
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 07:19 PM
Apr 2016

This began slowly during Gov Kaine's time in office. McDonnell continued it on a case by case basis. This wholesale change by Gov. McAuliffe is very surprising but he has made some very bold moves since he took office. Mostly vetoes of whacked out Republican legislation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Voting Effect of Virg...