Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 02:53 PM Apr 2016

Study: Retail prices stable a year after Seattle minimum wage hike

http://www.retaildive.com/news/study-retail-prices-stable-a-year-after-seattle-minimum-wage-hike/417949/

The National Retail Federation officially opposes legislating a national rate for hourly workers. While workers' advocates say that current rates fail to provide a living wage, the NRF and many businesses warn that higher wages make layoffs and price increases more likely.

But a year after Seattle implemented significantly higher minimum pay, that outcome hasn’t come to pass, to the surprise of even University of Washington researchers themselves....

62% of employers said they expected to raise prices of goods and services because of the higher wages, and 10% of employers said they’d be forced to move their business. But subsequent analysis, done through a combination of “web scraping” and in-person visits to stores and restaurants, found few price increases.

"We looked in grocery stores, drugstores and other types of retail outlets—we were focusing on places where your middle class or low-income families would be more likely to shop," study leader Jacob Vigdor, a University of Washington public policy professor, told Fast Company. "The fact that we didn't find very many price increases in those types of outlets was a little bit more surprising to us.”
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Study: Retail prices stable a year after Seattle minimum wage hike (Original Post) KamaAina Apr 2016 OP
Thanks for posting the facts about this suffragette Apr 2016 #1
Same deal here in San Jose KamaAina Apr 2016 #2
The reality in Seattle is the raise is being phased in suffragette Apr 2016 #3
Min wage rates are always phased in over time... Wounded Bear Apr 2016 #5
Exactly so. suffragette Apr 2016 #8
the world didn't end? KG Apr 2016 #4
Yah. Not too surprised whatthehey Apr 2016 #6
What a surprise. I brought a table of conservatives Hortensis Apr 2016 #7
The lower stress level will have positive consequences on workers AND families lostnfound Apr 2016 #9
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
2. Same deal here in San Jose
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 02:59 PM
Apr 2016

when we raised it to a relatively paltry $10. Jack in the Box threatened to make us drive to Santa Clara for a burger. Local chain Pizza My Heart (!) chimed in as well. At the end of the day: (crickets).

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
3. The reality in Seattle is the raise is being phased in
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 03:05 PM
Apr 2016

There wasn't an immediate raise to $15. It's being phased in over a few years.
Glad to see similar results that chicken little forecasts in CA have likewise not happened.

Wounded Bear

(58,673 posts)
5. Min wage rates are always phased in over time...
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 03:38 PM
Apr 2016

Despite what the RW spinbots would have us believe, there is lots of time for businesses and workers to prepare for it.

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
6. Yah. Not too surprised
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 03:44 PM
Apr 2016

Sure if you go from $7.25 to $15 in a labor-intensive industry overnight where min was the prevailing wage beforehand there might be some cost-plus inflation, but not the case here, or very many other places either. Even in my decidedly sub-Seattle COL area, entry level retail usually starts at $9.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
7. What a surprise. I brought a table of conservatives
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 03:50 PM
Apr 2016

to a halt on this topic a few months ago when I asked them ("just curious," and they did bring it up) if they would oppose a 200% wage increase if it meant a 20% chance of being let go. Silence, then quip and change of subject from one of the quicker people. Two of them were business owners, a couple retired, and a couple still working who I feel sure must be hurting in this rural, low-pay area (she's a school cafeteria worker augmenting his loan processor income, very typical). And us.

I never got a chance to say I'd absolutely choose a chance to double my income. (It'd be over 200% here because this is Georgia. The min wage is so low the federal $7.25 kicks in -- for most.)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Study: Retail prices stab...