Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 04:50 PM Apr 2016

A Unity Solution to the $20 Bill Issue: Add a New Denomination With Harriet Tubman

I think America is in need of an African American and a woman on paper currency. Harriet Tubman is a perfect candidate.

That being said, I don't think it was necessary to erase Andrew Jackson from the front of the $20 dollar bill.

A simpler, less divisive solution, that would've achieved the same thing, putting a non-white on money, and a woman on money, would've been to either

1. Make a new denomination-Nixon's reason for decirculating $500, $1000, and higher denominations of money, the mafia, is largely dead. Additionally, we've had enough inflation since Nixon did so that we could use larger denominations.

2. Tubman on a larger denomination than anyone else, even Franklin, would send a powerful message: a black person can be on the most valuable bill out there. It would also not create a narrative of throwing anyone else under the bus because no one else would move; conservatives would have less of a talking point, and only ultra-cons, not mainstream ones, would whine.

3. Presentism is not only ahistorical, but political dangerous for Democrats. You don't see Britain tearing down Oliver Cromwell even tho Oliver Cromwell is hated among Irish as Hitler is among Jews. Canada also didn't spread from sea to sea so peacefully, nor has any large country. Russia had similar issues against indigenous Siberians as it expanded across two continents. There is a line between self-reflection and self-shame that is very thin but avoidable to cross. No, America should never be overall ashamed of Washington and Jefferson, just as Princeton decided with Woodrow Wilson. Where are calls to remove Ulysses Grant, committer of America's only European-style anti-Semitic pogroms from the $50 dollar bill? He was a horrid POTUS too.

65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Unity Solution to the $20 Bill Issue: Add a New Denomination With Harriet Tubman (Original Post) ericson00 Apr 2016 OP
Unity GOD HELP ME Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #1
we could use it; it would be good for this country ericson00 Apr 2016 #3
SJW is a term used solely by right wingers. Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #5
The only people who care about this negatively are never voting for the Democratic party ProudToBeBlueInRhody Apr 2016 #29
"SJW" is a term used by RW bigots. Odin2005 Apr 2016 #60
Andrew Jackson didn't LIKE paper money, or a federal banking MADem Apr 2016 #2
Unity in this case means keep white people happy. Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #4
Well, the joke is they're putting him on the back, so if you hold it up to the light, MADem Apr 2016 #10
I did not know that about him, how he despised paper money. Not until last week when this Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #11
Hey--why don't you try reading this thread again. MADem Apr 2016 #15
you misunderstood Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #16
We're good! nt MADem Apr 2016 #23
much of our country's founders were unrepentent racists ericson00 Apr 2016 #9
Grant wasn't KNOWN for General Order No. 11, though. MADem Apr 2016 #13
The person you are responding to MA, used the term SJW in an earlier post so Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #19
Aaaah, there it is! nt MADem Apr 2016 #22
Presentism? sfwriter Apr 2016 #27
I must say, that is a solid essay--very well 'presented' if you will! MADem Apr 2016 #48
He also owed a slave for about a year. n/t gladium et scutum Apr 2016 #43
I'm interested to know where all these Blue_Tires Apr 2016 #34
Nowadays, people think it's PRINCE!! LOL!! MADem Apr 2016 #47
We can have both. roamer65 Apr 2016 #63
Why, though? This is a good opportunity to downgrade a racist, MADem Apr 2016 #65
I agree that we should not Svafa Apr 2016 #6
Another solution...racists can get the fuck over it spyker29 Apr 2016 #7
This. Svafa Apr 2016 #8
Exactly My Good Babushka Apr 2016 #12
But a larger denomiation... scscholar Apr 2016 #18
Now that sounds like a plan! nt MADem Apr 2016 #14
K&R...nt pkdu Apr 2016 #20
Correct answer - nt Ohio Joe Apr 2016 #53
Put Jackson on the $3. Warren Stupidity Apr 2016 #17
I thought that was reserved for Nixon. Fozzledick Apr 2016 #37
Perhaps Nixon Could be on the ass-side? Warren Stupidity Apr 2016 #42
"Tubman on a larger denomination than anyone else" rock Apr 2016 #21
I can't wait to go to the ATM and get me a handful of Tubmans! nt MADem Apr 2016 #24
I larfed KG Apr 2016 #25
People still use that green stuff? basselope Apr 2016 #26
Ever since my credit info was stolen because THREE DIFFERENT stores I shopped Svafa Apr 2016 #28
Sure ProudToBeBlueInRhody Apr 2016 #31
I'm really not seeing the problem struggle4progress Apr 2016 #30
Fuck that shit edhopper Apr 2016 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #33
Are people really having a tantrum over this? Warren DeMontague Apr 2016 #35
A solution in search of a problem. Brickbat Apr 2016 #36
If there was ever an issue I cared less about Egnever Apr 2016 #38
They don't give a shit until you want to replace a white man with a black woman. Iggo Apr 2016 #46
Again I would be surprised if there is more than a handfull of people Egnever Apr 2016 #49
How about a $1000 bill? nt Jitter65 Apr 2016 #39
no, andrew jackson should not have been on the money in the first place La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #40
You’re Lynching Her Legacy: Harriet Tubman On The $20 Bill JEB Apr 2016 #41
Why does there have to be appeasement on something like this? tammywammy Apr 2016 #44
I also have a proposal: replace Jackson with Tubman. Iggo Apr 2016 #45
You mean, use her on a bill hardly anyone ever uses? No, thanks. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #50
If we had a $200 or $500, it would probably be used a lot ericson00 Apr 2016 #51
A new bill presents problems for cash registers, Ilsa Apr 2016 #52
I guess the Democratic Jefferson/Jackson Dinner ericson00 Apr 2016 #55
I'm saying let's not bother appeasing the racists. nt Ilsa Apr 2016 #57
Or make currency like stamps whistler162 Apr 2016 #54
yea, or have bills alternating faces ericson00 Apr 2016 #56
..or have two versions of the same denomination as ericson said above. roamer65 Apr 2016 #64
you might be the last holdout Enrique Apr 2016 #58
we should be getting rid of big bills Mosby Apr 2016 #59
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #61
As a Native American let me make my personal opinion clear. denbot Apr 2016 #62
 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
3. we could use it; it would be good for this country
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 04:57 PM
Apr 2016

and help elect Clinton and make Democrats look better. The SJWs are risking hijacking the party and making it look too far left enough that Trump could have an opening.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
29. The only people who care about this negatively are never voting for the Democratic party
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 05:34 PM
Apr 2016

Fuck Andrew Jackson. I'm no SJW and he sucked anyway. Glad that Hamilton is staying where he is, that would have been a shame and besides his cultural relevance is bigger than ever.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
2. Andrew Jackson didn't LIKE paper money, or a federal banking
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 04:56 PM
Apr 2016

system, even!

He was an unrepentant racist, too.

Harriet Tubman is where she belongs--on the most popular bill. The truth of the matter is this: black people built America. Their unpaid labor crafted the foundations upon which this nation sits. Giving a little space on the twenty to ONE BLACK PERSON who played a role in giving black people their freedom is certainly not too much to offer--in fact, it's damn little.

HT on the twenty is a victory for black Americans, and women.

You wanna put Jackson on something? Put him on a special quarter--maybe fire up another Quarter Series, chock-a-block full of Presidents. It'll take a ton of money off the market while people "collect the set."

MADem

(135,425 posts)
10. Well, the joke is they're putting him on the back, so if you hold it up to the light,
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 05:01 PM
Apr 2016

it'll look like he's STILL chasing her!!!!

I'm not down with this "Don't hurt those feefees" version of unity. I think they should just take him off the damn bill--he has outstayed his welcome, and really wasn't appropriate in the first place, given his views on paper money and national banks!

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
11. I did not know that about him, how he despised paper money. Not until last week when this
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 05:03 PM
Apr 2016

all came up.

So by saying you still want him on the front vs her, knowing this about his hating paper money, you are saying that you have less than no respect for black people or their history.

You cant show less respect than saying we dont want this, but to keep it from a black person, we will take it.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
15. Hey--why don't you try reading this thread again.
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 05:09 PM
Apr 2016

I think you might want to erase that post of yours, calling me all these names, because you're totally on the wrong foot here.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
16. you misunderstood
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 05:14 PM
Apr 2016

I wasnt talking about you, I was talking about the person you and I are both responding to

my fault, I could have made that more clear

 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
9. much of our country's founders were unrepentent racists
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 05:00 PM
Apr 2016

and plus, Grant committed one of the only anti-Semitic pogroms in America; where are people calling to remove him from the $50 dollar bill? Is Washington next? Is Jefferson next? how long before we remove states' names over presentism?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
13. Grant wasn't KNOWN for General Order No. 11, though.
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 05:07 PM
Apr 2016

He was known as a winning Civil War general and a President. And a bit of a drunkard.

Jackson WAS known for his dislike of paper money and national banking, though. It was a big piece of his persona. He was a DUMB PICK from the git-go.


That said, if you don't want Grant on the fifty, get off your best intentions and work to get him off it. Don't say "Look over here!" because you're mad that they're dumping a racist who didn't like paper money off of paper money in favor of a minority woman hero of the sort that Jackson didn't favor.

I mean...come off it. Keep it real.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
19. The person you are responding to MA, used the term SJW in an earlier post so
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 05:17 PM
Apr 2016

realize who you are talking to.

 

sfwriter

(3,032 posts)
27. Presentism?
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 05:30 PM
Apr 2016

Presentism. That is a term used by historians to denote a sort of anachronistic thinking IN WORKS OF HISTORY.

For example, if I were to say Jackson was a dick in the nineteenth century because he owned slaves, violated supreme court rulings and, you know, committed ethnic cleansing against the Cherokee, that is presentism. You can easily prove Jackson to have been a dick in his own time simply by quoting his slaves, the supreme court and the Cherokee (that survived) right there in his own century. Ta da, not presentism. Plenty of people thought he was an ass in his own terms, in his own time.

Now money, the money we spend and use here in the present, isn't susceptible to presentism. We decide what values we want to exhibit NOW. It isn't sacred. We don't see these men as demigods. We RIGHTLY see what he did as abhorrent to us today.

States names? Why not. It isn't presentism to change the name of something.

How about the Constitution even? It's not even presentism to change that, because like place names, THERE IS NO HISTORICAL ARGUMENT BEING MADE.

These arguments are about the present. People who shout SJW just don't know how to live in the present any more.

Perhaps what we need less of is less of your historicism. Oh ericson00, look away, look away Dixie Land.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
34. I'm interested to know where all these
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 06:12 PM
Apr 2016

revisionist defenders of Andrew Jackson are coming from...

two weeks ago, if you had quizzed people on the street on whose face was on the $20 bill, how many would have gotten it right??

MADem

(135,425 posts)
47. Nowadays, people think it's PRINCE!! LOL!!
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 08:01 PM
Apr 2016



http://www.radiox.co.uk/news/fan-prince-on-a-20-dollar-bill-and-call-it-1999/#Jia04lC2YX2LWmFf.97


But that is a solid point you're making! I find the defense of this racist guy who didn't like paper money curious, indeed!

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
63. We can have both.
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:11 PM
Apr 2016

You can have Andrew Jackson and Harriet Tubman $20's at the same time. Readers can be programmed for both and it would give some variety to otherwise boring money. If the US Mint can handle state and national park quarters, the BEP can handle two styles of 20's.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
65. Why, though? This is a good opportunity to downgrade a racist,
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:32 PM
Apr 2016

paper money hater who didn't like federal banks and never should have graced the bill in the first place.

This is an opportunity to correct a mistake. We should take it, and not pander to people who want to continue to lift up that genocidal individual for some stupid reasons that make no damn sense.

Let's acknowledge that he wasn't all that and a bag of chips, and put him in the dustbin of history and the back of the damn bill, where he's lucky to find a spot.

Svafa

(594 posts)
6. I agree that we should not
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 04:58 PM
Apr 2016

erase history, even the ugliest parts of it. However, I don't think we should be putting people like Jackson in a position of honor (like on our currency) either. Yes, many of the founding fathers were slaveholders, but some spoke out against it (for what that's worth). Jackson on the other hand was a staunch supporter of slavery. And the crimes he committed against Native Americans are unforgivable. I was disappointed to find that he was still going to be on the Tubman bill at all (on the back). I absolutely oppose whitewashing American history, but I think someone like Jackson should stay in the history books instead of being honored by having his face on a bill.

My Good Babushka

(2,710 posts)
12. Exactly
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 05:05 PM
Apr 2016

It would cost a lot to start to print another denomination of money, racists can get over it.
I wish we changed our money more often, like stamps. And had more colors.

rock

(13,218 posts)
21. "Tubman on a larger denomination than anyone else"
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 05:19 PM
Apr 2016

Would not be a good idea. How many $100 bills have you handled? Few, because they're rare? What we want is a common bill for Harriet.

Svafa

(594 posts)
28. Ever since my credit info was stolen because THREE DIFFERENT stores I shopped
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 05:31 PM
Apr 2016

at were hacked just last year, I'm using cash more and more, that's for sure.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
31. Sure
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 05:36 PM
Apr 2016

Some small bakeries and shop still only take paper money and studies show people are more careful with their paper money as far as spending than just swiping a debit card.

struggle4progress

(118,314 posts)
30. I'm really not seeing the problem
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 05:35 PM
Apr 2016

We change our bills from time to time

I've know people who could remember when Jackson wasn't on the $20 bill

Tubman is a genuine American hero

edhopper

(33,595 posts)
32. Fuck that shit
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 05:57 PM
Apr 2016

there have been plenty more deserving than Jackson for over a Century. Either Roosevelt for two.
Dump him for Tubman and don't look back.

Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
35. Are people really having a tantrum over this?
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 06:26 PM
Apr 2016

Get jackson off the 20. Paper money is becoming increasingly irrelevant anyway. We should put turing or lovelace on the paper money, because it is all being replaced by computers anyway.

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
38. If there was ever an issue I cared less about
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 06:39 PM
Apr 2016

I would be hard pressed to find it. I find it extremely difficult to believe there are more than a handful of people out there that give two shits who is on their money.

Iggo

(47,561 posts)
46. They don't give a shit until you want to replace a white man with a black woman.
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 07:55 PM
Apr 2016

Then they give a whole ton of shits.

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
49. Again I would be surprised if there is more than a handfull of people
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 08:15 PM
Apr 2016

That care even with those caveats. Obviously deeply racist assholes are going to care but who gives a flying fuck what they think?

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
40. no, andrew jackson should not have been on the money in the first place
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 07:11 PM
Apr 2016

this is correcting a wrong. no unity is needed. people who are jackson fans can just suck it.

(although, the genocidal maniac will still be on it)

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
44. Why does there have to be appeasement on something like this?
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 07:43 PM
Apr 2016

Fuck the racist bigots. They don't want to use $20 bills with Harriet Tubman, then they can choose to not use it. Fuck them.

 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
51. If we had a $200 or $500, it would probably be used a lot
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 08:25 PM
Apr 2016

given the inflation we've said since they last existed.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
52. A new bill presents problems for cash registers,
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 08:28 PM
Apr 2016

Bank money counters, etc.

And Tubman isn't honored if she's on a bill no one uses.

1. Kick Asshole Jackson off the $20.
2. Put HT on the the $20.
3. Tell the racists who want to return to days of slavery, "Get over it."

 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
55. I guess the Democratic Jefferson/Jackson Dinner
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 08:30 PM
Apr 2016

is "returning to slavery."

It's not. Its not like Calhoun, Thurmond, Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis, etc. is on the bill.

 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
56. yea, or have bills alternating faces
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 08:31 PM
Apr 2016

have half of the bill of one denomination have one person, the other half have another. Europe has several versions of a single denomination in circulation.

Thank you for not jumping on me.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
64. ..or have two versions of the same denomination as ericson said above.
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:13 PM
Apr 2016

Bill readers are programmable nowadays.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
58. you might be the last holdout
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 09:13 PM
Apr 2016

even the conservatives have deemed this no longer worthy of making a stink over.

Response to ericson00 (Original post)

denbot

(9,901 posts)
62. As a Native American let me make my personal opinion clear.
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 09:46 PM
Apr 2016

FUCK Andrew Jackson, and the horse he rode to hell on!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Unity Solution to the $...