General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHouse And Senate Republicans Form An "Anti-National Park" Caucus To Wreck Our Park System
But that was before a peculiar and malignant strain of Republicanism was introduced into the body politic, one which behaves like a virus programmed to destroy any hint of the effectiveness and social benefits of government, no matter how much the country is permanently harmed in the process. The Republican Party that has emerged in the last ten years is the most anti-environment political party in the nations history, so much that an entire caucus comprised of House and Senate Republicans have made it a legislative goal to erode and ultimately destroy the nations public lands, including our National Parks:
A group of 20 senators and representatives has formed a de facto anti-parks caucus in Congress and is waging the most significant legislative and ideological challenge to Americas national parks in decades, says a new report released Monday by the Center for American Progress. The analysis finds that this anti-parks caucus is composed of less than five percent of Congress but is responsible for introducing dozens of bills to block the creation of new national parks, end Americas most effective parks program, and sell off public lands.
Prominent Republicans within the de facto caucus include current Texas Senator/ Presidential candidate Ted Cruz, Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski, Utah Senator Mike Lee and Montana Senator Steven Daines. House members include Nevada Republican Mark Amodei, California Republican Paul Cook, and the current Chair of The House Natural Resource Committee, Utah Republican Robert Bishop. The members of the Anti-Parks caucus, all of whom are Republicans, have certain other things in common:
Every member of the anti-parks caucus can be described in at least one of the following ways: is member of the Tea Party; was challenged by a Tea Party candidate in a recent primary; or represents a district that is less competitive than average.
THE REST:
https://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/4/23/1519122/-House-And-Senate-Republicans-Form-An-Anti-National-Park-Caucus-To-Wreck-Our-Park-System
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)2naSalit
(86,647 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)though their name has acquired association of course.
There are big players behind this whose profiteering, including oil and gas exploration, is greatly hampered by federal and state ownership of lands, i.e., public ownership, and the restrictions that come with it. We're not talking about local ranchers here either.
These locusts have been encouraging civil disobedience and "militia"/Bundy-type challenges to our sovereignty for a very long time now, as only one small prong of their greedy efforts at oversetting our ownership. By far most of their investment has gone to convincing us to fight "oppression by big government and "destruction of freedom." Before it's too late, of course. The Bundys and the "militia" movement play a small but noisy role in their plotting.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)I guess that makes me a conspiracy theorist. But I don't see how these guys can just drop what they are doing every time some yahoo decides to take on the Federal government three states away or more.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)but their extremism is unquestionably encouraged. I wish I could remember the name of the show, but funding of a TV or video series with a "personal freedom"/anti-government theme (and reportedly at least a couple of other shows) was traced back to an organization serving very wealthy ultraconservatives.
CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)[S]imilar proposals to seize control of Americas public lands have been introduced by right-wing lawmakers in eleven western states Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Wyoming and Washington.
Thanks to support from the Koch-backed American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and front groups for the oil industrys PR giant, Richard Berman, as well as increasing lobbying by the Utah-based American Lands Council, these proposals have now gained prominence at the national level.
This article has a list of caucus members, including Ted Cruz.
https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/green/report/2016/04/11/135044/the-rise-to-power-of-the-congressional-anti-parks-caucus/
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I confess I have a lousy memory for names and usually just use "people like the Kochs." Names are powerful, anonymity also. Look at "Hillary." Hostility and blam could not have been focused as they have without a name and face.
Takket
(21,577 posts)2naSalit
(86,647 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)Camp out in your own backyard and leave the scenic wonders to the extraction industries who know how to get every last nickel out of our natural resources. Why bother hiking a wilderness trail when you can just jump on a treadmill and watch travel videos in the comfort of your own home, and you won't have to worry about dodging the logging trucks, ore haulers or oil tankers. Don't even think about hunting and fishing, everything is contaminated with heavy metal toxins, lethal chemical pollution, leaching petroleum byproducts, leaking hazardous waste, and poisonous household products, just go buy some frozen fish sticks... enjoy!
A public Service message brought to you by the friendly folks at:
Yellowstone National Quarry
The Grand Canyon Mining Consortium
Yosemite Lumber Company, Ltd.
Glacier Bay Petroleum, Inc.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,182 posts)That's like being anti-puppy and anti-sunny days.
JEB
(4,748 posts)maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)Almost every National Park has been fought against by conservatives - often delaying them for decades. It's why there are so many National Monuments - Presidents can designate them without Congress.
One argument against them: they draw too many people to that place. I just spent a week on the San Juan River in UT. "National Park Caliber" scenery, but devoid of people. Paradise.
But conservatives could give a fuck about conservation of wilderness - they want to exploit the land for commerce.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)protection of property and person." Charles Koch
He means police, firefighting, and military. Not public education and certainly not national parks. We just throw trash around them. Yosemite, for instance, would be better off privatized into the ownership of wealthy people who will take proper care of the land.
Koch really does mean it, and he has united over 700 megamillionaires and billionaires behind him. Plus, there are many others of his ilk who are also determined to severely limit government but refuse his leadership.