Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:05 PM Apr 2016

House And Senate Republicans Form An "Anti-National Park" Caucus To Wreck Our Park System

The nation’s 405 National Parks welcomed a record-breaking 292 million visits this past year, the most since 1999. This is actually National Park Week, in which access to the parks is free to everyone through April 24th. As millions of Americans understand, these beautiful parks provide an invaluable escape from urban congestion, suburban sprawl and from the deadening Walmart-ification of most of the remaining open spaces between this country’s major cities and towns. Until very recently our nation’s hundred-year old National Park System had enjoyed the enthusiastic support of both major political parties, each recognizing the value and wisdom in preserving and protecting these national treasures for the benefit of all Americans and future generations.

But that was before a peculiar and malignant strain of Republicanism was introduced into the body politic, one which behaves like a virus programmed to destroy any hint of the effectiveness and social benefits of government, no matter how much the country is permanently harmed in the process. The Republican Party that has emerged in the last ten years is the most anti-environment political party in the nation’s history, so much that an entire caucus comprised of House and Senate Republicans have made it a legislative goal to erode and ultimately destroy the nation’s public lands, including our National Parks:

A group of 20 senators and representatives has formed a de facto “anti-parks caucus” in Congress and is waging the most significant legislative and ideological challenge to America’s national parks in decades, says a new report released Monday by the Center for American Progress. The analysis finds that this anti-parks caucus is composed of less than five percent of Congress but is responsible for introducing dozens of bills to block the creation of new national parks, end America’s most effective parks program, and sell off public lands.


Prominent Republicans within the de facto caucus include current Texas Senator/ Presidential candidate Ted Cruz, Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski, Utah Senator Mike Lee and Montana Senator Steven Daines. House members include Nevada Republican Mark Amodei, California Republican Paul Cook, and the current Chair of The House Natural Resource Committee, Utah Republican Robert Bishop. The members of the “Anti-Parks” caucus, all of whom are Republicans, have certain other things in common:

Every member of the anti-parks caucus can be described in at least one of the following ways: is member of the Tea Party; was challenged by a Tea Party candidate in a recent primary; or represents a district that is less competitive than average.


THE REST:

https://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/4/23/1519122/-House-And-Senate-Republicans-Form-An-Anti-National-Park-Caucus-To-Wreck-Our-Park-System
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House And Senate Republicans Form An "Anti-National Park" Caucus To Wreck Our Park System (Original Post) Triana Apr 2016 OP
pure evil loosed upon our earth. Kip Humphrey Apr 2016 #1
A better name is the "Ammon Bundy Caucus" yellowcanine Apr 2016 #2
DUzy!!! 2naSalit Apr 2016 #8
Exactly. jwirr Apr 2016 #11
"Honor" that nothing little puppet? I'd rather not, Hortensis Apr 2016 #13
I really think there is big money behind the Bundys and their ilk. yellowcanine Apr 2016 #14
Me, too. I'm not sure most are actually funded, Hortensis Apr 2016 #15
I hate these assholes. CrispyQ Apr 2016 #3
Good for you for naming names. Hortensis Apr 2016 #16
The Bundy movement is alive and well Takket Apr 2016 #4
And infiltrating our government. 2naSalit Apr 2016 #10
Who needs magnificent parks when you could have a vista of profitable oil derricks? procon Apr 2016 #5
What kind of asshole would be anti-National Park? Tommy_Carcetti Apr 2016 #6
Anti-Mom, anti-applepie. Greedy misguided fools. JEB Apr 2016 #7
They think they're Crusaders for the Constitution and The American Way. maxsolomon Apr 2016 #9
"The only valid purposes of government are Hortensis Apr 2016 #12

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
13. "Honor" that nothing little puppet? I'd rather not,
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:21 PM
Apr 2016

though their name has acquired association of course.

There are big players behind this whose profiteering, including oil and gas exploration, is greatly hampered by federal and state ownership of lands, i.e., public ownership, and the restrictions that come with it. We're not talking about local ranchers here either.

These locusts have been encouraging civil disobedience and "militia"/Bundy-type challenges to our sovereignty for a very long time now, as only one small prong of their greedy efforts at oversetting our ownership. By far most of their investment has gone to convincing us to fight "oppression by big government and "destruction of freedom." Before it's too late, of course. The Bundys and the "militia" movement play a small but noisy role in their plotting.

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
14. I really think there is big money behind the Bundys and their ilk.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:32 PM
Apr 2016

I guess that makes me a conspiracy theorist. But I don't see how these guys can just drop what they are doing every time some yahoo decides to take on the Federal government three states away or more.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
15. Me, too. I'm not sure most are actually funded,
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:11 PM
Apr 2016

but their extremism is unquestionably encouraged. I wish I could remember the name of the show, but funding of a TV or video series with a "personal freedom"/anti-government theme (and reportedly at least a couple of other shows) was traced back to an organization serving very wealthy ultraconservatives.

CrispyQ

(36,478 posts)
3. I hate these assholes.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:16 PM
Apr 2016

[S]imilar proposals to seize control of America’s public lands have been introduced by right-wing lawmakers in eleven western states — Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Wyoming and Washington.

Thanks to support from the Koch-backed American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and front groups for the oil industry’s PR giant, Richard Berman, as well as increasing lobbying by the Utah-based American Lands Council, these proposals have now gained prominence at the national level.


This article has a list of caucus members, including Ted Cruz.

https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/green/report/2016/04/11/135044/the-rise-to-power-of-the-congressional-anti-parks-caucus/

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
16. Good for you for naming names.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:14 PM
Apr 2016

I confess I have a lousy memory for names and usually just use "people like the Kochs." Names are powerful, anonymity also. Look at "Hillary." Hostility and blam could not have been focused as they have without a name and face.

procon

(15,805 posts)
5. Who needs magnificent parks when you could have a vista of profitable oil derricks?
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:35 PM
Apr 2016

Camp out in your own backyard and leave the scenic wonders to the extraction industries who know how to get every last nickel out of our natural resources. Why bother hiking a wilderness trail when you can just jump on a treadmill and watch travel videos in the comfort of your own home, and you won't have to worry about dodging the logging trucks, ore haulers or oil tankers. Don't even think about hunting and fishing, everything is contaminated with heavy metal toxins, lethal chemical pollution, leaching petroleum byproducts, leaking hazardous waste, and poisonous household products, just go buy some frozen fish sticks... enjoy!


A public Service message brought to you by the friendly folks at:

Yellowstone National Quarry
The Grand Canyon Mining Consortium
Yosemite Lumber Company, Ltd.
Glacier Bay Petroleum, Inc.

maxsolomon

(33,345 posts)
9. They think they're Crusaders for the Constitution and The American Way.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:19 PM
Apr 2016

Almost every National Park has been fought against by conservatives - often delaying them for decades. It's why there are so many National Monuments - Presidents can designate them without Congress.

One argument against them: they draw too many people to that place. I just spent a week on the San Juan River in UT. "National Park Caliber" scenery, but devoid of people. Paradise.

But conservatives could give a fuck about conservation of wilderness - they want to exploit the land for commerce.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
12. "The only valid purposes of government are
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:18 PM
Apr 2016

protection of property and person." Charles Koch

He means police, firefighting, and military. Not public education and certainly not national parks. We just throw trash around them. Yosemite, for instance, would be better off privatized into the ownership of wealthy people who will take proper care of the land.

Koch really does mean it, and he has united over 700 megamillionaires and billionaires behind him. Plus, there are many others of his ilk who are also determined to severely limit government but refuse his leadership.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»House And Senate Republic...