Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 08:31 PM Apr 2016

Hot damn..Alabama is doing something SANE!

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (Apr. 21, 2016) – On Wednesday, an important House committee passed a bill that would abolish marriage licenses in Alabama and effectively nullify both sides of the contentious debate on same-sex marriage. If passed into law, the bill would essentially remove the state from the business of marriage.

Sen. Greg Albritton (R-Bay Minette) introduced Senate Bill 143 (SB143) in February, where it was passed by a 23-3 vote last month.. The legislation would abolish all requirements to obtain a marriage license in Alabama. Instead, probate judges would simply record civil contracts of marriage between two individuals based on signed affidavits.

“All requirements to obtain a marriage license by the State of Alabama are hereby abolished and repealed. The requirement of a ceremony of marriage to solemnized the marriage is abolished.”

Under the proposed law, a judge of probate would have no authority to reject any recording of a marriage, so long as the affidavits, forms, and data are provided. In practice, the state’s role in marriage would be limited to recording marriages that have already occurred. As noted in the official bill synopsis, “This bill would eliminate the requirement of marriage licenses.”

Yesterday, the House House Judiciary Committee passed SB143 with some amendments, which inside sources say will help it get to the Governor’s desk.
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2016/04/alabama-house-committee-passes-bill-eliminating-government-marriage-licensing/

If passed into law, SB143 would accomplish two things.

First, it would effectively render void the edicts of federal judges that have overturned state laws defining marriage. The founding generation never envisioned unelected judges issuing ex cathedra pronouncements regarding the definition of social institutions like marriage and the Constitution delegates the federal judiciary no authority to meddle in the issue. Constitutionally, marriage is an issue left to the state and the people.

Second, the bill would limit the state’s role in defining and regulating marriage, ending the squabble between factions seeking to harness the power of the state.


State involvement in marriages begin with racial discrimination lasw.
before that, people recorded marriages in the family Bible or some such paper, until a visiting preacher could come along and make it offcial.

By trying to avoid marrying same sex couples, this law would make void all old state laws. Hot damn.
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
2. Come back, Shane, come back!!!!! It' better here now.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 08:47 PM
Apr 2016

Let's just hope they don't figure out how accidentally liberal they will be.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
3. So, they want to take marriages out of the hands of government
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 08:59 PM
Apr 2016

and put them in the hands of preachers? I'm not sure that is such a good thing.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
12. This Ala. law, if you read the link, does not say marriage is out of the hands of gov
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 12:43 PM
Apr 2016

or solely in the hands of preachers.


History will show you why and how the State got involved in marriage laws
but before then, for hundreds of years, people became married at what we know as a county/community level,
no licenses, and often months before a preacher showed up to do a religious ceremony.
In Europe, civil marriages are quite common, involving signatures on a form.

This law will simply have marriages recorded, like births and deaths are recorded, at the county Gov. level.
No licenses will be needed.
No county judges will perform any ceremony.
Anyone can also have a religious ceremony if they want, but that will be in addition to the recording at the courthouse.



 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
13. This is saying that if we can't restrict marriage to who WE want to restrict it to
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 12:58 PM
Apr 2016

We will eliminate it.




Just watch, they will try to make an end-around the SCOTUS ruling.

This is only the first step.


This is done as a reaction to gay marriage.



there wasn't a push to get government out of marriage before that.



Motive, and timing make this suspicious.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
17. The proposed law will not eliminate marriage at all.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 03:15 PM
Apr 2016

It will eliminate the Probate Judge from officiating at the marriage
and remove the required license.
Instead, the only thing that will change is the paperwork to get married

Marriage will be a form registration process.
the form will be legal, so will the marriage.

It is done this way all over the world, esp. Europe, as a civil marriage.

Makes the bigoted county clerks happy, makes it easier in fact to get married,
does not prevent any religious service after the forms are signed.

To my mind, it is a win-win.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
8. I think this is the correct way to go but I cannot tell you how
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 12:29 PM
Apr 2016

many times I have needed marriage and divorce papers to qualify for some program. These programs are also going to have to change.

Democat

(11,617 posts)
10. If it causes problems for average citizens, they'll get it fixed
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 12:36 PM
Apr 2016

If it's only a problem for minorities, they might not care.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
14. You will have papers.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 02:54 PM
Apr 2016

If you get married in Ala. today, you buy a license.
someone ( a judge, or a minister,) mumbles some words in front of you and signs a marriage certificate.

The license and certificate are kept by the county for their records.
That is why when you need them, you can get a copy.

Under the new law, a copy of the registry form will be kept, and I imagine they will charge about the same fee as they did for a license.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
9. Seems like this would affect divorces also...
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 12:29 PM
Apr 2016

And any claim of child support...not such a great idea.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
15. Why???????
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 02:58 PM
Apr 2016

Marriage is still gonna happen.
records are still gonna be kept.
The only thing that will change is the paperwork to get married
and the elimination of the probate judge to say some words.
Marriage will be a form registration process.
the form will be legal, so will the marriage, so divorce will still go on.

It is done this way all over the world, esp. Europe, as a civil marriage.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
11. I think the Alabama constitution still requires
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 12:42 PM
Apr 2016

separation of church and state. If so, Alabama has always performed only civil unions, of course, and never did perform sacred unions, i.e., what "marriage" is considered to be to religious people.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
16. Exactly.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 03:05 PM
Apr 2016

Alabama now is just like any other state, where you get a license, you choose whether to have a county judge,or a justice of the peace, or a minister mumble the words.

The new law will eliminate the license and the county judge, and instead will deem a marriage is valid by the couple signing a marriage form.
One can still have a religious ceremony in addition to that.

It still will forbid underage marriages.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
19. I freely admit the positive aspect is a by-product of bigotry.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 08:18 PM
Apr 2016

It really does make things easier for most people now, tho.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hot damn..Alabama is doin...