Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 11:17 PM Jun 2012

Will unions back President Obama like they did in 2008?

Obviously, they won't be voting Republican. But with the modest support shown to Mayor Barret from the President, I wonder how jazzed any of these folks will be in November, and if that might be a big enough game changer so as to allow The GOP to steal the WH???

Thoughts/opinions?

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will unions back President Obama like they did in 2008? (Original Post) Yurovsky Jun 2012 OP
I would say they will likely give huge support to Obama jpbollma Jun 2012 #1
I was speaking to a union president tonight ibegurpard Jun 2012 #7
Since you put it that way... sadbear Jun 2012 #2
The majority will most likely vote for Obama but Raine Jun 2012 #8
I imagine everyone thrown under the bus HooptieWagon Jun 2012 #3
Why wont they vote Republican? dogman Jun 2012 #4
My union has already endorsed the president. I believe AFL CIO has as well. proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #5
But how many members of your union will vote for Mittens? pstokely Jun 2012 #11
Very few will vote for Romney proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #12
Why should they? bermudat Jun 2012 #6
That was the sentiment I got from an AFSCME friend of mine... Yurovsky Jun 2012 #10
They almost have to do less because the ranks have diminished over the term TheKentuckian Jun 2012 #9
BTW, your talking point has a small hole jeff47 Jun 2012 #13

jpbollma

(552 posts)
1. I would say they will likely give huge support to Obama
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 11:24 PM
Jun 2012

however, the unions really need to work on their messaging to voters and perhaps focus on trying to get some pro-labor ballot initiatives passed like they did in Ohio.

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
7. I was speaking to a union president tonight
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 01:39 AM
Jun 2012

And he agreed with me that unions have some major PR to do.

sadbear

(4,340 posts)
2. Since you put it that way...
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 11:24 PM
Jun 2012

do you really think they'll sit this one out to teach President Obama a lesson? Hmmm, didn't something like this happen recently with disastrous results?

Raine

(30,540 posts)
8. The majority will most likely vote for Obama but
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 02:37 AM
Jun 2012

I doubt they will knock themselves out to GOTV and do all the other grunt work they did in 2008.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
3. I imagine everyone thrown under the bus
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 12:01 AM
Jun 2012

will be apathetic about helping push it. Unions, progressives... the administration has burned a lot of bridges, a lot of people have been given the middle finger and havent forgotten.

dogman

(6,073 posts)
4. Why wont they vote Republican?
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 12:17 AM
Jun 2012

According to Ed Schultz tonight, 27% of union members voted for Walker. It's been happening for many years, remember Reagan Democrats? Unions have been known to limit their outlook to their own perceived interests and danced with the devil many times. The three g's still dominate the mindset of many members.

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
10. That was the sentiment I got from an AFSCME friend of mine...
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 07:42 AM
Jun 2012

while the IBEW member who sponsors/coaches my sons baseball team seemed to still be onboard with the Obama/Biden '12 campaign (volunteering, yard signs, etc). I just felt like I was getting mixed messages from my union friends. Maybe they's a private/public union disparity on the intensity of that support (post Wisconsin), or maybe that's what corporate media wants us to believe. I sure hope everyone realizes the cost of apathy... I've never understood the whole "anything would be better than X" when X is a CANDIDATE FOR THE OPPOSITION PARTY!

With less than 5 months to go, those who feel betrayed/neglected need to ask themselves if they want to be responsible for electing Mittens ... and I get the whole "Team Obama is the guilty party in this conflict" argument, but I know I'd rather lose an argument than lose an election. JMHO.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
9. They almost have to do less because the ranks have diminished over the term
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 02:54 AM
Jun 2012

That is less money and less boots on the ground. It was very important to make some headway but instead labor has been taking a beating and that has and will continue to have an impact.

We "bipartisan" killed ACORN and whiffed on anything to give unions a better hand.

Little or nothing to do with Barret, the ranks dwindle and what is left is beat to hell and has made concession after concession with leaders too close to management and politicians.

We are killing our ground assets and a golden goose, which means more of that corporate ca$h and all that comes with that.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
13. BTW, your talking point has a small hole
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 04:23 PM
Jun 2012

Obama campaigned in WI in 2010. It didn't help. Polls showed no bump for the democrats he campaigned for.

To claim Obama could have "saved the day" if he only showed up is to conveniently ignore that fact.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will unions back Presiden...