Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deminks

(11,014 posts)
Tue May 3, 2016, 10:25 AM May 2016

Chris Christie Vetoes Equal Pay Bill, Calling It ‘Business Unfriendly’

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2016/05/03/3774752/christie-veto-equal-pay/

New Jersey’s lawmakers want to require employers to pay women the same as men for essentially the same work. But Gov. Chris Christie (R) thinks they went too far.

The bill that passed both chambers of the state’s legislature would have banned employers from paying women less for “substantially similar” work as men, and would only have allowed differing pay rates between genders if employers could prove it was based on something besides sex, such as education, experience, or performance. The similarity of the work would have been determined based on the required responsibilities, effort, and skills for jobs across all of an employer’s operations.

Most equal pay laws require the same pay for the exact same work. But New Jersey’s bill would have been much stronger, reaching beyond the exact same jobs to require women to be paid equally if they’re doing the same tasks in a different role. The problem is common given that when women enter a particular job, the pay drops because their work is valued less, even if it’s the same work being performed by men. For example, maids make less than janitors; high school teachers make less than college professors; women’s sports coaches tend to be paid less than men’s coaches.

This concept, known as pay equity or comparable worth, used to be popular among statehouses. By 1989, 20 states had analyzed the pay of their own workforces to see whether men and women performing essentially the same duties were being paid differently. Over a decade, they spent more than $527 million to give more than 335,000 women a raise because they were being paid less despite doing basically the same work as men, eliminating between 25 and 33 percent of the pay gap. A national law would have been one of the strongest ways to reduce the gender wage gap, getting rid of over a quarter of it. Minnesota still conducts regular pay equity assessments and has significantly narrowed its gap, and California already passed a law just like New Jersey’s.

But Christie specifically objected to this piece of the bill in his veto, calling it “nonsensical” and saying that it “makes New Jersey very business unfriendly.”

(end snip)

I loved that joke at the WHCD last weekend, the one about Morning Joke and MSNBC being up Trumps *ss so far they bumped into Chris(t) Christie.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chris Christie Vetoes Equal Pay Bill, Calling It ‘Business Unfriendly’ (Original Post) deminks May 2016 OP
How does the Republican party get ANY female votes? KeepItReal May 2016 #1
Because they're brainwashed and likely told what to do by their ignorant husbands! n/t RKP5637 May 2016 #2
Yes, the Emancipation Proclamation was "Business Unfriendly" too. whathehell May 2016 #3
what an a/h! Stellar May 2016 #4
You know, if 'business' was friendlier to me... Wounded Bear May 2016 #5

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
1. How does the Republican party get ANY female votes?
Tue May 3, 2016, 10:32 AM
May 2016

This is f@cking disgusting.

Which also describes Gov. Chris Christie.

Wounded Bear

(58,662 posts)
5. You know, if 'business' was friendlier to me...
Tue May 3, 2016, 01:37 PM
May 2016

I'd be friendlier to 'business.'

Same goes for Republicans and assholes, but I'm repeating myself.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chris Christie Vetoes Equ...