Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYou soon may be able to sue your bank. Watch Wall Street heads explode
?1457400406The Consumer Finance Protection Bureau that this woman did more than any other single person to make happen is proposing a rule in which the PROTECTION part of its name ought to be capitalized.
The last time you signed a contract for a cell phone plan, a bank account, or a credit card, you probably signed away your right to go to court if that company cheated you. Thats because most contracts for financial products contain forced arbitration clauses buried deep in the fine print. These clauses prohibit consumers from protecting themselves in court, and they make it a lot easier for financial institutions to get away with cheating their customers. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, October 2015.
In a move The New York Times calls the biggest that the agency has made since its inception in 2010, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Thursday proposed a rule that would bar mandatory arbitration clauses in contracts with financial firms. Since it requires no congressional approval, the rule quite likely will go into effect after a 90-day public comment period in which opposition from business groups will no doubt be extensive, loud and bullshitty. (If youd like to comment, you can choose a method here.) Foes of the rule, which could cost firms billions, include the U.S. Chamber of Commerce:
The proposed rule is a wolf in sheeps clothing, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce said in a statement. Now the agency designed to protect consumers is proposing a rule that will end up hurting them.
Yadda, yadda, propaganda.
The widely used arbitration clauses effectively deny consumers their day in court by keeping them from using class-action lawsuits, which are the only truly effective means they have of fighting firms that engage in deceitful and sometimes illegal practices. The CFPB stated Thursday in a release published on its website:
Signing up for a credit card or opening a bank account can often mean signing away your right to take the company to court if things go wrong, said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. Many banks and financial companies avoid accountability by putting arbitration clauses in their contracts that block groups of their customers from suing them. Our proposal seeks comment on whether to ban this contract gotcha that effectively denies groups of consumers the right to seek justice and relief for wrongdoing.
In a year-long investigation, Jessica Silver-Greenberg and otherTimes reporters undertook a detailed study of arbitration clauses that the financial industry keeps arguing are a boon for consumers. The investigative team found the claims to be bogus. And they confirmedno surprisethat its the person disputing small amounts, say, for late fees and overdraft charges, that gets hurt worst. From 2010 to 2014, the Times found, just 505 consumers blocked from class action suits went to arbitration over disputes of $2,500 or less. Yet tens of millions of Americans have signed financial contracts that include arbitration clauses.
Much More at the LINK: DailyKos
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 409 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You soon may be able to sue your bank. Watch Wall Street heads explode (Original Post)
Stellar
May 2016
OP
meow2u3
(24,764 posts)1. Hint: if the US Chamber of Commerce doesn't like it
it has to be good for consumers and the country. No longer will Big Finance be able to rip off consumers while hiding behind obscure mandatory arbitration clauses.
Thank you, Sen. Warren!