General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDear climate change deniers, 2012 has so far been the warmest the US has ever seen...
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - So far, 2012 has been the warmest year the United States has ever seen, with the warmest spring and the second-warmest May since record-keeping began in 1895, the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reported on Thursday.
Temperatures for the past 12 months and the year-to-date have been the warmest on record for the contiguous United States, NOAA said.
The average temperature for the contiguous 48 states for meteorological spring, which runs from March through May, was 57.1 degrees F (13.9 C), 5.2 degrees (2.9 C) above the 20th century long-term average and 2 degrees F (1.1 C) warmer than the previous warmest spring in 1910.
Record warmth and near-record warmth blanketed the eastern two-thirds of the country from this spring, with 31 states reporting record warmth for the season and 11 more with spring temperatures among their 10 warmest.
"The Midwest and the upper Midwest were the epicenters for this vast warmth," Deke Arndt of NOAA's Climatic Data Center said in an online video. That meant farming started earlier in the year, and so did pests and weeds, bringing higher costs earlier in the growing season, Arndt said.
http://news.yahoo.com/warmest-u-spring-record-noaa-204427303.html
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)I understand they froze their bananas off in Europe.
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)badtoworse
(5,957 posts)fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)badtoworse
(5,957 posts)One part of the planet is not representative of the global climate. We had the mildest winter I can remember in the northeast, but winter in Europe was much colder than normal. What did average global temperatures look like over the same period?
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)More is on the way...
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120527153720.htm
Merlot
(9,696 posts)Global warming affects weather patterns, making it warmer in some places and colder in others. The thing to notice is unusual and extreme weather patterns.
Even if global warming were a hoax, pollution is very real, and so are oil shortages. Both will get worse if we don't look to alternatives. So for those people that want to believe in the "hoax" theory, fine by me. But are they ok with being held hostage to oil?
Auggie
(31,173 posts)San Francisco Chronicle / June 7th, 2012
The Earth is reaching a "tipping point" in climate change that will lead to increasingly rapid and irreversible destruction of the global environment unless its forces are controlled by concerted international action, an international group of scientists warns.
Unchecked population growth, the disappearance of critical plant and animal species, the over-exploitation of energy resources, and the rapidly warming climate are all combining to bring mounting pressure on the Earth's environmental health, they say.
Scientists from five nations, led by UC Berkeley biologist Anthony Barnosky, report their analysis Thursday in the journal Nature.
They likened the potential impact of the forces to previous major changes - both gradual and abrupt - in the planet's history that triggered mass extinctions and expansions, and produced completely new worldwide environments.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/06/07/MN1T1OT26G.DTL
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)never mind that they are more like delusions...
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)SoutherDem
(2,307 posts)Jesus is coming back soon anyway.
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)And then we have those who will always have faith that there is a supreme being in charge, even and especially of our weather.
Those who don't deny are increasingly fatalistic, believing that we have already passed the point of no return. I find myself increasingly in that camp. Certainly the power players have no intention of changing course.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Earth's inhabitants?
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)They have no regard for those who have less. We are "other." They believe their wealth will insulate them.
That's what I think.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002742880
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002742868
Neue Regel
(221 posts)Oh, you mean the warmest in 117 years. That's a much different statement. Don't look now, but new research shows we don't understand how our climate and CO2 actually interact.
http://www.capitolcolumn.com/news/scientists-modern-earth-may-halt-effects-of-global-warming/
Researchers presented new evidence from deep-sea sediment cores dating back to the late Miocene period, which show that Earth may be less susceptible to a changing climate.
During that time, temperatures across a broad swath of the North Pacific were 9-14 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than today, while atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations remained lownear values prior to the Industrial Revolution, say scientists.
Researchers say the results are surprising, considering past research which shows the Earth warming at an increasingly alarming rate.
Its a surprising finding, given our understanding that climate and carbon dioxide are strongly coupled to each other today. In the late Miocene, there must have been some other way for the world to be warm, said graduate student Jonathan LaRiviere, a co-author of the study. One possibility is that large-scale patterns in ocean circulation, determined by the very different shape of the ocean basins at the time, allowed warm temperatures to persist despite low levels of carbon dioxide.
And a link to the source article