K&R

I wonder if this will interfere with Blair's?

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/the-blair-interview-i-wont-be-lord-blair-569131

It's fairly irrelevant to his business - he's more about trying to make bastards (whether corporations or regimes) look respectable on the international circuit, rather then being a lobbyist for them in Britain. Maybe if a Blairite got into power in the UK, he'd consider how much he could make by spending more time here to influence them.

There is discussion about impeaching the lapdog, even at this late date. But of course, impeachment is off the table here, and we don't look backward.

mention this story when it breaks with more than a 15 second spot

It will or should have political implications for our presidential election
since 'we' pushed this bullshit. Gee didn't an x president write an editorial
in the British papers telling them to 'trust Tony Blair' on going to war with Iraq? Let me see how I voted on that.

Who the F cares? NOTHING AT ALL will happen to him. Or his fellow War Criminals.

Who killed David Kelly?

http://www.globalresearch.ca/ten-years-ago-the-death-of-dr-david-kelly-murdered-on-the-orders-of-her-majestys-government/5343229

Geez.........everyone knows that.

Which is why


Lord Hutton decided that evidence related to the death, including the post-mortem report and photographs of the body, should remain classified for 70 years. and only one Dr.was allowed to view and inspect the body and decided it was suicide

Although suicide was officially accepted as the cause of death, some medical experts have raised doubts, suggesting that the evidence does not support this. The most detailed objection was provided in a letter from three medical doctors published in The Guardian,[28] reinforced by support from two other senior physicians in a later letter to the newspaper.[29] These doctors argued that the autopsy finding of a transected ulnar artery could not have caused a degree of blood loss that would kill someone, particularly when outside in the cold (where vasoconstriction would cause slow blood loss). Further, this conflicted with the minimal amount of blood found at the scene. They also contended that the amount of co-proxamol found was only about a third of what would normally be fatal. Dr Rouse, a British epidemiologist wrote to the British Medical Journal offering his opinion that the act of committing suicide by severing wrist arteries is an extremely rare occurrence in a 59-year-old man with no previous psychiatric history.[30] Nobody else died from that cause during the year.

and he said it's well-accepted among his colleagues that Kelly's death was not a suicide.

doesn't register after 70 years

This does not bode well for the authorities taking this seriously in 70 years time.

eg

http://www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.uk now gets you pages headed "Personal Injury UK Advice on making personal injury or accident claims in the UK." Nominet records show they've had it since Oct 2013.

just wanted to add to the thread.

because otherwise I'd jump. That Kelly murder was one of the worst crimes in my lifetime - killed him because he knew their illegal war was a lie. He knew there were no weapons. They'd all be in prison for that alone

YET We Hope for Change.

Thanks for the heads-up, Ichingcarpenter. Tony the Poodle is gonna piddle his widdle pantsuit.

but not much more than bad press for him.

But we can be hopeful
it might go further

I hope the US covers the story....LOL....... ok
I'm a joker.....

...covers the auto industry. Always with the talking points...liberals blah blah.

Goes to Europe and comes back with jaw open. Says the media there (Deutschland, France, real continental stuff) cover so much stuff they miss here.

I just stare.

but I look at many sources just like you to decide what's what.
Some US news are good but it usually comes from alternative media that has to be filtered too.

The US mainstream news is corrupted but sometimes they say things they don't realize what it really said.

This British paper isn't bad but also has an agenda like everyone does.

Poodle has been getting rich. The sneer on his face speaks volumes.

http://a1.files.biography.com/image/upload/c_fill,cs_srgb,dpr_1.0,g_face,h_300,q_80,w_300/MTIwNjA4NjMzNzQzNTc0NTQw.jpg

And I suppose he doesn't really have a good reputation to lose. So I reconsider - no one is going to suffer yet.

Wink!!

"These people" being every world leader and their henchmen that knowingly lied America into an unnecessary and tragic and crime against humanity invasion.

And Richard Clarke's hope re that these people are no longer welcome in polite society.

Although in these times they'd give Rummy and Condi their own reality show. Tagline: SYRIA! You're invaded!

-90% Jimmy

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/apr/22/chilcot-real-scandal-tony-blair-iraq-invasion-radicalising-british-muslims
<snip>
What has received far less attention is the devastating evidence Chilcot heard about the invasion making Britain more vulnerable to terrorism. Blair has always dismissed suggestions that his foreign policy decisions were in any way responsible for encouraging terrorist attacks and “radicalising” young British Muslims as a charge perpetuated by “the left”.

The evidence to Chilcot contradicts his assertion. Lady Manningham-Buller, head of MI5 at the time, bluntly told the inquiry the invasion “undoubtedly increased the threat” of terrorist attacks in Britain.

She said she communicated her view to Blair via Whitehall’s Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC). “The number of plots, the number of leads, the number of people identified, and statements of people as to why they were involved,” all pointed to the increased terrorist threat to the UK.

“Our focus was then on dealing with the manifestations of terrorist threats in the United Kingdom since 9/11. Our work was increasing exponentially. It increased very much more when we went into Iraq … ”

She told the inquiry: “To my mind Iraq, Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11,” and continued: “Our involvement in Iraq radicalised, for want of a better word, a whole generation of young people. Some British citizens saw our involvement in Iraq as being an attack on Islam.”

unindicted co-conspirators