Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
Wed May 25, 2016, 11:04 AM May 2016

Chuck Schumer quietly guts JASTA bill

"Sen. Charles Schumer slipped in an amendment letting the State and Justice departments halt lawsuits by 9/11 families against terror sponsors."

It turns out that just before the vote, Sen. Charles Schumer and other proponents of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act stuffed an amendment into the final draft allowing the attorney general and secretary of state to stop any litigation against the Saudis in its tracks.

Yes, JASTA would remove the statutory restrictions that have prevented 9/11 families from taking the Saudi kingdom to court. But Schumer helped craft an entirely new section to the original bill, giving the Justice and State departments the power to stay court action indefinitely. All they have to do is inform the judge hearing the case that the US government has engaged with ­Riyadh in diplomatic talks to resolve the issue.

The quiet, behind-the-scenes watering-down of the controversial bill explains why it passed without a single Republican or Democratic objection. The White House had lobbied senators heavily to kill the bill.


http://nypost.com/2016/05/24/sneaky-schumer-added-loophole-to-halt-911-saudi-suits/

It's utterly obvious why a version of this bill - with teeth - can never and will never be allowed to pass, and since playing politics with 911 is still very popular in DC I guess the only option left was illusory victory.

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chuck Schumer quietly guts JASTA bill (Original Post) EdwardBernays May 2016 OP
Yay government! NV Whino May 2016 #1
Ironically EdwardBernays May 2016 #2
Good point. NV Whino May 2016 #3
smucky chuckie wallyworld2 May 2016 #14
corporations best friend wallyworld2 May 2016 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author guyton May 2016 #4
Who is Schumer supporting for President? n/t left-of-center2012 May 2016 #5
Good old Chuck would make a fine Republican! dmosh42 May 2016 #6
What an asshole. Say hello to the new Senate leader of the DINO party... truebrit71 May 2016 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #8
Follow the money Rafale May 2016 #9
Because EdwardBernays May 2016 #19
Why, Schumer? and Why President Obama? jwirr May 2016 #10
Corporate Dems d_legendary1 May 2016 #12
Because EdwardBernays May 2016 #18
Absolutely - I had not thought about it from that side. They jwirr May 2016 #20
That is correct EdwardBernays May 2016 #23
Very sad. jwirr May 2016 #25
What are you willing to sacrifice for peace? HillareeeHillaraah May 2016 #30
Follow the money. And then follow the money. marble falls May 2016 #11
AND Once Again OUR Democratic Party Shows Just How Very ChiciB1 May 2016 #13
Well yes and no EdwardBernays May 2016 #17
Meant To Say Didn't Think Anything Was Going To Get Better... ChiciB1 May 2016 #21
I live in Europe EdwardBernays May 2016 #26
Massive plus one! Enthusiast May 2016 #22
Back in the 1980s when he was the same age that I am now 1939 May 2016 #29
Think of the long view HillareeeHillaraah May 2016 #16
Great, we have a working relationship awoke_in_2003 May 2016 #27
Diplomacy is about more than what makes us "feel better" HillareeeHillaraah May 2016 #28
The DLC strikes again.(even though supposedly defunct,it's alive!) MaeScott May 2016 #24

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
2. Ironically
Wed May 25, 2016, 11:51 AM
May 2016

This is probably the most pro-American outcome possible. The alternative would have screwed America - which would've been fair but... America doesn't really believe in fair.

wallyworld2

(375 posts)
15. corporations best friend
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:11 PM
May 2016

The Ultimate Culprits On Behalf Of Wall Street Deregulation: Chuck Schumer (D) And Kevin McCarthy (R)-- And Who Are The New Dems? - See more at: http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/search?q=chuck+Schumer#sthash.qO9GvIav.dpuf




Two rats: Kevin McCarthy and Chuck Schumer

Response to EdwardBernays (Original post)

Response to EdwardBernays (Original post)

Rafale

(291 posts)
9. Follow the money
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:37 PM
May 2016

Why would he do that? Surely there is a reason he would pick Saudi citizens and government over American families?

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
19. Because
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:14 PM
May 2016

The US can't allow this to happen. We've done too much bad to too many countries' civilians that if we suddenly allowed those people to sue America we'd go bankrupt. You'd be talking about 10s of thousands of lawsuits. Our foreign policy over the last six decades is such that we won't ever be able to allow our citizens sue other countries for their foreign policy, because we wouldn't survive the reprisal.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
18. Because
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:14 PM
May 2016

The US can't allow this to happen. We've done too much bad to too many countries' civilians that if we suddenly allowed those people to sue America we'd go bankrupt. You'd be talking about 10s of thousands of lawsuits. Our foreign policy over the last six decades is such that we won't ever be able to allow our citizens sue other countries for their foreign policy, because we wouldn't survive the reprisal.

 

HillareeeHillaraah

(685 posts)
30. What are you willing to sacrifice for peace?
Thu May 26, 2016, 09:03 AM
May 2016

Are you willing to let go of vengeance? Revenge? Saving face? Are you willing to let go of the ability to sue an enemy in ally's clothing?

Does suing the bad actors of the Saudi Kingdom take us closer or further away from achieving calm in the region?

What are you willing to sacrifice for peace?

ChiciB1

(15,435 posts)
13. AND Once Again OUR Democratic Party Shows Just How Very
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:57 PM
May 2016

much they've been playing CYA for years and years!! God forbid that "we the people" be informed as to what OUR GOVERNMENT is doing in OUR NAME!

Barney Frank, Chuck Schumer, Barbara Boxer and a very long list of VERY POWERFUL & VERY INFLUENTIAL Democrats are being made to show their REAL colors! Who know how many more names are going to pop up as each day goes by.

It's no wonder this country has lost so much respect for TPTB!

I fully realize that new leadership won't be able to bring instant change & it's going to take quite some time, but THERE COMES A TIME that the people of this country must stop electing the same people over and over and expecting a different outcome! STATUS QUO is no longer an option IMO! And then there's DONALD TRUMP, my God what have we become???? I feel like I'm getting pushed further and further into a corner and waiting for the walls to go up!

I'm so frustrated and I seriously think it's going to get much better UNLESS something changes!

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
17. Well yes and no
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:13 PM
May 2016

Yes 100% that Schumer is status quo. And yes the quiet way this was done is opposite of democratic and transparent.


But.


The US can't allow this to happen. We've done too much bad to too many countries' civilians that if we suddenly allowed those people to sue America we'd go bankrupt. You'd be talking about 10s of thousands of law suits. Our foreign policy over the last six decades is such that we won't ever be able to allow our citizens sue other countries for their foreign policy, because we wouldn't survive the reprisal.

ChiciB1

(15,435 posts)
21. Meant To Say Didn't Think Anything Was Going To Get Better...
Wed May 25, 2016, 03:08 PM
May 2016

I DO understand what you're saying, but when will it begin to stop? We've let this grow for so long and our answer to ALL of it is to keep doing it and look the other way!

Are you not aware of how little respect we have in the world now? Other countries are pushing forward with infrastructure, health care and a long, long list of problems while THIS COUNTRY simply starts more WARS!

So we just flip a coin to see what side we want? It does seem that FINALLY we're having so many people being made aware of what's been done in our name and if we KEEP ignoring it what kind of message are we sending?

YES, it's a HUGE CLUSTER F--K, but I have kids and grand kids who have opened their eyes now and ALL the years I've spent trying to get them involved can go down the drain.

But I suppose I can just say fine... I'll be gone in 15 years or so and what's it to me. Then again I can get hit by a hurricane or tornado and be gone tomorrow. What, ME WORRY??? As they've said to me for years now, I need to NOT get involved because it upsets me. Kind off hate to think my many, many years of activism has been a total waste. But, in a way I guess it has been.

Sorry for the rant, just so DONE with trying to make others see. IT IS A LOSING BATTLE, though.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
26. I live in Europe
Wed May 25, 2016, 04:09 PM
May 2016

I know alllll to well how little respect America has..

Americans - as a rule - not only do not know US history, they do not want to know US history. Full stop.

The rest of the world doesn't have that option.

And it isn't waiting for the US' permission to make their citizens' lives better.

1939

(1,683 posts)
29. Back in the 1980s when he was the same age that I am now
Thu May 26, 2016, 05:20 AM
May 2016

y father (1913-1990) said to me that when he voted he voted against any incumbent regardless of party. The only time he let party influence him was when there was no incumbent. If there was an incumbent he automatically voted for the other person.

 

HillareeeHillaraah

(685 posts)
16. Think of the long view
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:12 PM
May 2016

Doesn't make national security sense to disintegrate one of the few, just barely working relationships with a Muslim country in the name of providing what? Closure to the families? my friend Danny went down with Tower 2. His wife and 3 kids received over $5 million in various settlements and initial donations. Emotionally, they carry scars forever. Financially, they have closure.

How much more broken do our relationships with Mid East countries need to be? What's the goal in suing the Saudi Kingdom? The entire planet knows what they did. You don't fix anything by adding more fuel to the fire of hatred and anger.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
27. Great, we have a working relationship
Thu May 26, 2016, 02:30 AM
May 2016

with the Muslim country that financed and trained the terrorists. We should feel better.

 

HillareeeHillaraah

(685 posts)
28. Diplomacy is about more than what makes us "feel better"
Thu May 26, 2016, 05:08 AM
May 2016

Think it's better to have them as an enemy? Think we should cut ties with them? How 'bout we add them to the list of countries we bomb....? Think that'll get us anywhere?

It's an imperfect world wrought with nefarious players. Can't kill them all. Seems to me we're more likely to influence the behaviors of allies than enemies.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chuck Schumer quietly gut...