Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,075 posts)
Fri May 27, 2016, 08:08 PM May 2016

Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Eight is not enough

Posted with permission.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/ruth-bader-ginsburg-eight-not-enough?cid=sm_fb_maddow


Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Eight is not enough
05/27/16 11:20 AM—Updated 05/27/16 12:26 PM
By Steve Benen


Last month, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), feeling pressure over his role in an unprecedented Supreme Court blockade, wrote an op-ed in which he insisted the whole mess is unimportant. The “sky won’t fall” if the Supreme Court remains deadlocked for a year and a half – eight justices is plenty – so the Republicans’ unprecedented scheme isn’t worth all the fuss.

Actual justices on the high court appear to feel differently. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg acknowledged publicly yesterday that the institution she serves is, in fact, being hurt by having eight justices instead of nine. The Washington Post reported:

The Supreme Court has deadlocked 4 to 4 in several cases since Justice Antonin Scalia’s death in February. Ginsburg told judges at a conference in New York that the situation is unfortunate because it essentially means important issues are being denied Supreme Court review, according to a copy of her prepared remarks.

“That means no opinions and no precedential value; an equal division is essentially the same as a denial of review,” Ginsburg said.

She added, “Eight, as you know, is not a good number for a multi-member court.”


Ginsburg is hardly the only one who’s noticed. Slate’s Dahlia Lithwick noted last week that the Supreme Court can pretend that “it can manage just fine with eight justices,” but the fact remains that the institution is struggling to do its job.

Nobody on the court can say: “Please give us a ninth justice so we can get back to work.” That sounds like a plea for a Justice Merrick Garland. That is why it’s left to former Justice John Paul Stevens to say it for them. Even if all eight justices were to agree that between being unable to take any cases for next term, and being unable to decide major cases this term, things are not getting done at the court.


The same week, the editorial board of the New York Times added, “Every day that passes without a ninth justice undermines the Supreme Court’s ability to function, and leaves millions of Americans waiting for justice or clarity as major legal questions are unresolved…. Despite what Senate Republicans may say about the lack of harm in the delay in filling the vacancy, the court cannot do its job without a full bench.”

By all appearances, the Senate’s Republican majority doesn’t care – according to Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), it’s somehow fair to treat Merrick Garland unfairly – but they should.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Eight is not enough (Original Post) babylonsister May 2016 OP
The Supreme Court should be fighting as a separate branch of government malaise May 2016 #1
I'm glad one of our justices finally came forward to say this... dubyadiprecession May 2016 #2
One chamber of the legislative branchis sabotaging malaise May 2016 #3
Have you noticed that nobody is fighting for Obama's Supreme Court nominee hearing...? TheProgressive May 2016 #4

dubyadiprecession

(5,716 posts)
2. I'm glad one of our justices finally came forward to say this...
Fri May 27, 2016, 08:32 PM
May 2016

The supreme court is deficient as an institution with only eight justices. Inability to rule conclusively and letting most lower court rulings stand, now negates its purpose for its existence.

 

TheProgressive

(1,656 posts)
4. Have you noticed that nobody is fighting for Obama's Supreme Court nominee hearing...?
Fri May 27, 2016, 09:06 PM
May 2016

Nobody. Not the DLC, Pelosi, Reid, the media, DU --- nobody.

It's like "its ok, we'll just slight President Obama out of his Constitutional duty to nominate/appoint a Supreme Court Justice' and the republicans are getting away with not holding hearings.

Republicans always seems to win don't they. And we citizen Democrats get screwed again.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Eigh...