General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRuth Bader Ginsburg: Eight is not enough
Posted with permission.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/ruth-bader-ginsburg-eight-not-enough?cid=sm_fb_maddow
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Eight is not enough
05/27/16 11:20 AMUpdated 05/27/16 12:26 PM
By Steve Benen
Last month, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), feeling pressure over his role in an unprecedented Supreme Court blockade, wrote an op-ed in which he insisted the whole mess is unimportant. The sky wont fall if the Supreme Court remains deadlocked for a year and a half eight justices is plenty so the Republicans unprecedented scheme isnt worth all the fuss.
Actual justices on the high court appear to feel differently. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg acknowledged publicly yesterday that the institution she serves is, in fact, being hurt by having eight justices instead of nine. The Washington Post reported:
That means no opinions and no precedential value; an equal division is essentially the same as a denial of review, Ginsburg said.
She added, Eight, as you know, is not a good number for a multi-member court.
Ginsburg is hardly the only one whos noticed. Slates Dahlia Lithwick noted last week that the Supreme Court can pretend that it can manage just fine with eight justices, but the fact remains that the institution is struggling to do its job.
The same week, the editorial board of the New York Times added, Every day that passes without a ninth justice undermines the Supreme Courts ability to function, and leaves millions of Americans waiting for justice or clarity as major legal questions are unresolved . Despite what Senate Republicans may say about the lack of harm in the delay in filling the vacancy, the court cannot do its job without a full bench.
By all appearances, the Senates Republican majority doesnt care according to Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), its somehow fair to treat Merrick Garland unfairly but they should.
malaise
(269,065 posts)This is bullshit on steroids.
dubyadiprecession
(5,716 posts)The supreme court is deficient as an institution with only eight justices. Inability to rule conclusively and letting most lower court rulings stand, now negates its purpose for its existence.
malaise
(269,065 posts)two branches of government
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)Nobody. Not the DLC, Pelosi, Reid, the media, DU --- nobody.
It's like "its ok, we'll just slight President Obama out of his Constitutional duty to nominate/appoint a Supreme Court Justice' and the republicans are getting away with not holding hearings.
Republicans always seems to win don't they. And we citizen Democrats get screwed again.