General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsReich: Why the Public’s Growing Disdain for the Supreme Court May Help Obamacare
The publics growing disdain of the Supreme Court increases the odds that a majority will uphold the constitutionality of Obamacare.
The latest New York Times CBS Poll shows just 44 percent of Americans approve the job the Supreme Court is doing. Fully three-quarters say justices decisions are sometimes influenced by their personal political views.
The immediate question is whether the Chief Justice, John Roberts, understands the tenuous position of the Court he now runs. If he does, hell do whatever he can to avoid another 5-4 split on the upcoming decision over the constitutionality of the Obama healthcare law.
My guess is hell try to get Anthony Kennedy to join with him and with the four Democratic appointees to uphold the laws constitutionality, relying primarily on an opinion by Judge Laurence Silberman of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia a Republican appointee with impeccable conservative credentials, who found the law to be constitutional.
http://robertreich.org/post/24687829230
I see no evidence to date that Roberts cares that a partisan 5-4 majority has decided many previous controversial cases. Not sure why Reich thinks Roberts would start caring about this now, much less that Roberts would actually side with four Democratic appointees to uphold the ACA.
SGMRTDARMY
(599 posts)the SCOTUS's job is to determine the constitutionality of laws, not what the public thinks of them, WTF do they care what people think of them, after all, it is a life time appointment, which is the way it should be.
Ship of Fools
(1,453 posts)all the shit exposed about Alito & Thomas proves to me,
at least, that they stopped taking that job seriously a long time ago.
I think that Mr. Reich is right. I think that since watching this CU trainwreck,
they might feel forced to pull it out of their ass, if they want to save their
legacy. Hell, isn't it all about having a library named after you when you
kack?
Just one woman's opinion.
NNN0LHI
(67,190 posts)Roberts has a medical condition(seizure disorder), that would probably leave him not insurable in the general populace without Obama-care.
Don
SGMRTDARMY
(599 posts)He has med. insurance for the rest of his life. If I were a betting man, I'd bet that it's going to be ruled unconstitutional which could be a good thing as it would open up the possibility of single payer.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)until he is 92. Also, because he has young kids.
Meiko
(1,076 posts)only motivation here is whether or not he will be insurable? That is just a wee bit shallow for the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court don't you think. My guess is that his decision will be based solely on the Constitutionality of the law.
Orangepeel
(13,933 posts)Right. Just like every other decision he's made.
Meiko
(1,076 posts)examples that you are not in agreement with.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)nt
former9thward
(32,082 posts)If Roberts wanted to curry favor with the American people he would not vote to uphold the Health Care Law. The very New York Times that is citing a 44% approval of the SC also says 2/3s of the people want all or some of the Health Care law overturned. So Roberts would vote to dump it. http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/07/new-poll-the-supreme-court-and-the-health-care-law/
madinmaryland
(64,933 posts)to overturn the law. No way he is leaning the other way.
Meiko
(1,076 posts)that there would be a coup in the SCOTUS and a couple of judges would change party affiliation and their ideologies overnight.
bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)Like about a week after the hearings .There job approval is just now getting attention so I don't think that is going to make a difference