Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBy FiveThirtyEight: Primary Coverage And Results = good analysis
Last edited Wed Jun 8, 2016, 01:10 PM - Edit history (1)
June 7 Primary Elections: Live Coverage And Results
Jun 7, 2016 Harry Enten 8:32 AM
Clinton Won Among Early California Voters, And Never Let Go
As my colleague Micah noted, Clinton has been called the winner in California by the AP and pretty much all the major news networks with 94 percent of precincts reporting. Her lead at this hour stands at 13 percentage points and a little over 400,000 votes out of more than 3 million cast. Howd she do it?
Clinton built a tremendous lead in the state from early mail-in votes, and she never relinquished it. Just after midnight, Clinton was up by 26 percentage points with over a million votes counted. By the time all the early vote was in, she was able to take that advantage up to about 400,000. That margin stayed remarkably consistent as more and more of the in-person vote was tabulated. In other words, Sanders fought Clinton to a draw among voters who cast their ballot at the polls yesterday, but the damage had been done by early voters, who tend to be older and more traditional party loyalists.
Clintons victory was larger than most public pollsters anticipated. Why? Its not entirely clear, though its not because Sanderss voters didnt come out to vote once news organizations called Clinton the presumptive nominee on Monday night. In fact, it seems pollsters missed Clintons large early voting advantage. The illustrious Field Poll, for instance, had Clinton ahead by only 7 percentage points among those who had cast a ballot by late May, which was clearly too low. A large exit poll of voters who had cast their ballot by mail as of June 4, conducted by Sextant Strategies & Research, had her up only 12 percentage points, which again was far too low.
What is clear is that Clinton did very well across the state. She is leading in all the major population centers, .............
Jun 7, 2016 Harry Enten 8:32 AM
Clinton Won Among Early California Voters, And Never Let Go
As my colleague Micah noted, Clinton has been called the winner in California by the AP and pretty much all the major news networks with 94 percent of precincts reporting. Her lead at this hour stands at 13 percentage points and a little over 400,000 votes out of more than 3 million cast. Howd she do it?
Clinton built a tremendous lead in the state from early mail-in votes, and she never relinquished it. Just after midnight, Clinton was up by 26 percentage points with over a million votes counted. By the time all the early vote was in, she was able to take that advantage up to about 400,000. That margin stayed remarkably consistent as more and more of the in-person vote was tabulated. In other words, Sanders fought Clinton to a draw among voters who cast their ballot at the polls yesterday, but the damage had been done by early voters, who tend to be older and more traditional party loyalists.
Clintons victory was larger than most public pollsters anticipated. Why? Its not entirely clear, though its not because Sanderss voters didnt come out to vote once news organizations called Clinton the presumptive nominee on Monday night. In fact, it seems pollsters missed Clintons large early voting advantage. The illustrious Field Poll, for instance, had Clinton ahead by only 7 percentage points among those who had cast a ballot by late May, which was clearly too low. A large exit poll of voters who had cast their ballot by mail as of June 4, conducted by Sextant Strategies & Research, had her up only 12 percentage points, which again was far too low.
What is clear is that Clinton did very well across the state. She is leading in all the major population centers, .............
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 507 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
By FiveThirtyEight: Primary Coverage And Results = good analysis (Original Post)
L. Coyote
Jun 2016
OP
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)1. So, maybe the voters of CA actually do prefer her in a large way over Bernie
She was doing things right and Bernie not so much.
FreeState
(10,579 posts)6. I didn't know who I would vote for when I entered the booth yesterday
I have a feeling I wasn't the only one that decided when I was there. Clinton did an excellent job of using the establishment in CA to get her voters out early and motivated.
In the end I voted as I always do in Primaries, I voted for who I want (Bernie) and in November I will be proud to vote for our first woman President.
Javaman
(62,534 posts)2. link? nt
Javaman
(62,534 posts)4. Thank you mucho! :) nt
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)5. Thanks. Edited.