Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 09:56 AM Jun 2016

By FiveThirtyEight: Primary Coverage And Results = good analysis

Last edited Wed Jun 8, 2016, 01:10 PM - Edit history (1)

June 7 Primary Elections: Live Coverage And Results
Jun 7, 2016 Harry Enten 8:32 AM

Clinton Won Among Early California Voters, And Never Let Go

As my colleague Micah noted, Clinton has been called the winner in California by the AP and pretty much all the major news networks with 94 percent of precincts reporting. Her lead at this hour stands at 13 percentage points and a little over 400,000 votes out of more than 3 million cast. How’d she do it?

Clinton built a tremendous lead in the state from early mail-in votes, and she never relinquished it. Just after midnight, Clinton was up by 26 percentage points with over a million votes counted. By the time all the early vote was in, she was able to take that advantage up to about 400,000. That margin stayed remarkably consistent as more and more of the in-person vote was tabulated. In other words, Sanders fought Clinton to a draw among voters who cast their ballot at the polls yesterday, but the damage had been done by early voters, who tend to be older and more traditional party loyalists.

Clinton’s victory was larger than most public pollsters anticipated. Why? It’s not entirely clear, though it’s not because Sanders’s voters didn’t come out to vote once news organizations called Clinton the presumptive nominee on Monday night. In fact, it seems pollsters missed Clinton’s large early voting advantage. The illustrious Field Poll, for instance, had Clinton ahead by only 7 percentage points among those who had cast a ballot by late May, which was clearly too low. A large exit poll of voters who had cast their ballot by mail as of June 4, conducted by Sextant Strategies & Research, had her up only 12 percentage points, which again was far too low.

What is clear is that Clinton did very well across the state. She is leading in all the major population centers, .............
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
By FiveThirtyEight: Primary Coverage And Results = good analysis (Original Post) L. Coyote Jun 2016 OP
So, maybe the voters of CA actually do prefer her in a large way over Bernie tonyt53 Jun 2016 #1
I didn't know who I would vote for when I entered the booth yesterday FreeState Jun 2016 #6
link? nt Javaman Jun 2016 #2
Link csziggy Jun 2016 #3
Thank you mucho! :) nt Javaman Jun 2016 #4
Thanks. Edited. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #5
 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
1. So, maybe the voters of CA actually do prefer her in a large way over Bernie
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 09:59 AM
Jun 2016

She was doing things right and Bernie not so much.

FreeState

(10,579 posts)
6. I didn't know who I would vote for when I entered the booth yesterday
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 01:45 PM
Jun 2016

I have a feeling I wasn't the only one that decided when I was there. Clinton did an excellent job of using the establishment in CA to get her voters out early and motivated.

In the end I voted as I always do in Primaries, I voted for who I want (Bernie) and in November I will be proud to vote for our first woman President.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»By FiveThirtyEight: Prima...