Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

midnight

(26,624 posts)
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 11:10 PM Jun 2016

Should Apple use tech to control when features work and when?

Last edited Fri Jul 1, 2016, 12:01 AM - Edit history (1)

"If Apple creates a way for third parties to control when certain iPhone features work, how will Apple control who has access to that technology? It’s not hard to imagine a government such as Turkey or Russia using it to blackout social media coverage of a protest.

Or better yet, when US speaker of the House Paul Ryan turns off all of the television camera’s in the House chamber?

Last week’s sit-in originally began as an effort by Democrats to hold the floor of the US House to tell Americans about why people who are on the government’s controversial no-fly list – shorthand for possible terrorism links – also shouldn’t be allowed to buy guns.

Ryan, in a moment of both real and digital politick, threw the House into recess and shut down the video feed from the broadcast cameras in the chamber. The cable channel C-Span uses the cameras to broadcast (often boring) unedited footage from the capitol."

Democrats used this technology when they realized the cameras were dark.


http://www.activistpost.com/2016/06/icensor-apple-patents-remote-kill-switch-for-iphone-cameras.html

This article is linked within this activist post article from The Guardian.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should Apple use tech to control when features work and when? (Original Post) midnight Jun 2016 OP
Couple of things worth noting jberryhill Jun 2016 #1
Thank you Aerows Jun 2016 #2
Good to know… Is an IR filter already on these phones? midnight Jun 2016 #3
Easy one Aerows Jul 2016 #6
Considering large crowds are when so many gun owners decide to attack, ... scscholar Jul 2016 #4
I think you got infrared protocol Aerows Jul 2016 #5
Why? Do we have a choice? nt silvershadow Jul 2016 #7
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
1. Couple of things worth noting
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 11:15 PM
Jun 2016

First, merely filing a patent application does not indicate that the described invention is going to be implemented. Many are filed for defensive purposes.

Secondly, using an IR signal to do it is easily defeated by using an IR filter. It's a fundamentally dumb idea, since an IR filter will block the control signal while allowing recording of the visible range.
 

scscholar

(2,902 posts)
4. Considering large crowds are when so many gun owners decide to attack, ...
Fri Jul 1, 2016, 12:28 AM
Jul 2016

we shouldn't disable cameras that could reveal the shooter.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should Apple use tech to ...