General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShould Apple use tech to control when features work and when?
Last edited Fri Jul 1, 2016, 12:01 AM - Edit history (1)
"If Apple creates a way for third parties to control when certain iPhone features work, how will Apple control who has access to that technology? Its not hard to imagine a government such as Turkey or Russia using it to blackout social media coverage of a protest.
Or better yet, when US speaker of the House Paul Ryan turns off all of the television cameras in the House chamber?
Last weeks sit-in originally began as an effort by Democrats to hold the floor of the US House to tell Americans about why people who are on the governments controversial no-fly list shorthand for possible terrorism links also shouldnt be allowed to buy guns.
Ryan, in a moment of both real and digital politick, threw the House into recess and shut down the video feed from the broadcast cameras in the chamber. The cable channel C-Span uses the cameras to broadcast (often boring) unedited footage from the capitol."
Democrats used this technology when they realized the cameras were dark.
http://www.activistpost.com/2016/06/icensor-apple-patents-remote-kill-switch-for-iphone-cameras.html
This article is linked within this activist post article from The Guardian.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)First, merely filing a patent application does not indicate that the described invention is going to be implemented. Many are filed for defensive purposes.
Secondly, using an IR signal to do it is easily defeated by using an IR filter. It's a fundamentally dumb idea, since an IR filter will block the control signal while allowing recording of the visible range.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)beat me to it RE: IR signal.
midnight
(26,624 posts)turn it off. IR's a worse battery hog than blue tooth.
scscholar
(2,902 posts)we shouldn't disable cameras that could reveal the shooter.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)mixed up with laser gun sights.