Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
Fri Jul 15, 2016, 09:31 PM Jul 2016

In DC, wiggling while handcuffed counts as assaulting an officer

https://www.revealnews.org/article/dcs-assaulting-an-officer-charge-could-hide-police-abuse-critics-say/

Wiggling while handcuffed. Bracing one hand on the steering wheel during an arrest. Yelling at an officer.

All these actions have led to people being prosecuted for “assaulting a police officer” in Washington, D.C., where the offense is defined as including not just physical assault, but also “resisting, opposing, impeding, intimidating or interfering” with law enforcement.


A five-month investigation by WAMU 88.5 News and the Investigative Reporting Workshop at American University, co-produced by Reveal, documented and analyzed nearly 2,000 cases with charges of assaulting a police officer. The results raise concerns about the use or overuse of the charge. Some defense attorneys see troubling indicators in these numbers, alleging that the law is being used as a tactic to cover up police abuse and civil rights violations.

As protests and rioting have exploded across the country in response to police conduct, even Cathy Lanier, the chief of police in the nation’s capital, is urging lawmakers to revise the statute because its broad application “naturally causes tensions between police and residents.”
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In DC, wiggling while handcuffed counts as assaulting an officer (Original Post) gollygee Jul 2016 OP
GOOD that 'Cathy Lanier, the chief of police in the nation’s capital, is urging elleng Jul 2016 #1
She's the chief of police. Why doesn't she just order FuzzyRabbit Jul 2016 #2
This part is easy to agree on. Igel Jul 2016 #3

elleng

(130,972 posts)
1. GOOD that 'Cathy Lanier, the chief of police in the nation’s capital, is urging
Fri Jul 15, 2016, 09:33 PM
Jul 2016

lawmakers to revise the statute because its broad application “naturally causes tensions between police and residents.”'

Igel

(35,320 posts)
3. This part is easy to agree on.
Fri Jul 15, 2016, 11:11 PM
Jul 2016
“This should be an early warning system for the agency,” said Geoffrey P. Alpert, professor of criminology at the University of South Carolina and an expert on police violence. “It tells you something is wrong and they need to figure what is going on. … The statistics, the patterns, the practices just don’t look right.”


After that ... The problem is disparate impact is that there sometimes are differences that merit disparate impact. The law involving it says this explicitly.

Too often disparate impact is held to have no underlying justification, and even to suggest that it's worth looking under the carpet to see if there is a justification is treated as a capital offense.

So I don't think that nice map looks right. But while I can say "racism" is the cause, I can also come up with other possible explanations for much of the variance. The problem is that if I can't come up with a single reason for all of the variance, then it's too complex. If even one racist incident occurs, it's going to assume that all the police-on-black incidents were due to racism while none of the police-on-white incidents were. That's not a statistical or "scientific" thing, that's a perceptual and psychological thing.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In DC, wiggling while han...