Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

deminks

(11,014 posts) Sat Jul 16, 2016, 05:33 PM Jul 2016

72

Elizabeth Warren absolutely shreds ‘terrifying’ Trump/Pence ticket: ‘Two small, insecure, weak men’

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/07/elizabeth-warren-absolutely-shreds-terrifying-trumppence-ticket-two-small-insecure-weak-men/

ven if Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren is not selected to be Hillary Clinton’s running mate, she has definitely secured herself a spot in the campaign as the go-to person for unrestrained and brutally frank criticism of the GOP ticket.

As Donald Trump prepared to formally announce Indiana Gov. Mike Pence as his running mate, Warren launched an all-out assault on the ticket, calling the Republican duo “two small, insecure, weak men.”

(snip)

” .@realDonaldTrump & @mike_pence are a perfect match: Two small, insecure, weak men who use hate & fear to divide our country & our people,” she began — and then it was on.

Of COURSE @realDonaldTrump – a guy who calls women fat pigs & bimbos – picked a VP who is famous for trying to control women’s bodies.

(end snip)

Thank you, Sen. Warren.

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Elizabeth Warren absolutely shreds ‘terrifying’ Trump/Pence ticket: ‘Two small, insecure, weak men’ (Original Post) deminks Jul 2016 OP

and merely iMPLIED MFM008 Jul 2016 #1

I love this chick realmirage Jul 2016 #2

Elizabeth BADASS Warren Stinky The Clown Jul 2016 #3

And then it was on? Cracklin Charlie Jul 2016 #4

Her attacks hit them right in their pride. GOLGO 13 Jul 2016 #5

Oh snap! Rex Jul 2016 #6

Just to add... Cracklin Charlie Jul 2016 #7

Hillary, PLEASE choose Elizabeth as your running mate.. red dog 1 Jul 2016 #8

It would be electric!. . . .n/t annabanana Jul 2016 #14

In other words, SDS....small dick Syndrome. nt msanthrope Jul 2016 #9

penis envy is bullshit. i see womb envy. pansypoo53219 Jul 2016 #10

Just a question--- don't attack me in response... 63splitwindow Jul 2016 #11

no mopinko Jul 2016 #12

It's a question that even luminaries like John Lewis have asked. forjusticethunders Jul 2016 #13

If ANYONE knows about breaking old, old barriers it would certainly be John Lewis... nt 63splitwindow Jul 2016 #15

I would prefer Bernie, but I don't see two women as a problem. nt Lucky Luciano Jul 2016 #17

Normally, it might be "too much change in one step" to have 2 women on the same ticket, red dog 1 Jul 2016 #20

Looking forward to her speech at the DNC packman Jul 2016 #16

We ARE Blessed bucolic_frolic Jul 2016 #18

I believe the RNC has chosen a losing team to lead our nation. And then rladdi Jul 2016 #19

Warren is 100% spot on IgelJames4 Jul 2016 #21

K & R SunSeeker Jul 2016 #22

K&R! raven mad Jul 2016 #23

MFM008

(19,816 posts)

1. and merely iMPLIED

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sat Jul 16, 2016, 05:34 PM

Jul 2016

they have tiny dicks.

realmirage

(2,117 posts)

2. I love this chick

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sat Jul 16, 2016, 05:37 PM

Jul 2016

Stinky The Clown

(67,808 posts)

3. Elizabeth BADASS Warren

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sat Jul 16, 2016, 05:40 PM

Jul 2016

BADASS

BADASS

BADASS

Cracklin Charlie

(12,904 posts)

4. And then it was on?

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sat Jul 16, 2016, 05:45 PM

Jul 2016

Looks to me like the first tweet got that party started!

GOLGO 13

(1,681 posts)

5. Her attacks hit them right in their pride.

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sat Jul 16, 2016, 05:45 PM

Jul 2016

She really knows how to go after needledick & ballsack. Keep em coming EW.

Rex

(65,616 posts)

6. Oh snap!

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sat Jul 16, 2016, 05:46 PM

Jul 2016

Cracklin Charlie

(12,904 posts)

7. Just to add...

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sat Jul 16, 2016, 06:05 PM

Jul 2016

If there is any chance that Senator Warren is auditioning for Vice President...she may have just earned the position.

red dog 1

(27,820 posts)

8. Hillary, PLEASE choose Elizabeth as your running mate..

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sat Jul 16, 2016, 06:07 PM

Jul 2016

Even if it means losing her Senate seat to a Republican

It will be a shot in the arm for the millions of Democrats who voted for Bernie Sanders, and it will UNIFY the Democratic Party.

If you pick Sen. Warren, you will easily defeat Trump & Pence!

annabanana

(52,791 posts)

14. It would be electric!. . . .n/t

Reply to red dog 1 (Reply #8)

Sat Jul 16, 2016, 10:26 PM

Jul 2016

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)

9. In other words, SDS....small dick Syndrome. nt

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sat Jul 16, 2016, 08:06 PM

Jul 2016

pansypoo53219

(20,981 posts)

10. penis envy is bullshit. i see womb envy.

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sat Jul 16, 2016, 08:29 PM

Jul 2016

63splitwindow

(2,657 posts)

11. Just a question--- don't attack me in response...

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sat Jul 16, 2016, 08:40 PM

Jul 2016

I think it is GREAT how Elizabeth Warren attacks Trump and now Pence. The more the better and it is all dead-on correct. IMHO the bully's nose MUST be bloodied repeatedly until he no longer bullys.

We all want HRC to be the next President of the United States. It goes without saying that it will be historic in the GREATEST SENSE to have that glass ceiling smashed by a person who should be elected regardless of her gender. With that in mind, her choice for VP should be someone who enhances her chances of reaching that goal. I believe we all agree upon that.

Now my question. Is there a chance that her having a female running mate would be "too much" change in one step for some people who would otherwise vote for her?

mopinko

(70,127 posts)

12. no

Reply to 63splitwindow (Reply #11)

Sat Jul 16, 2016, 09:52 PM

Jul 2016

forjusticethunders

(1,151 posts)

13. It's a question that even luminaries like John Lewis have asked.

Reply to 63splitwindow (Reply #11)

Sat Jul 16, 2016, 10:09 PM

Jul 2016

I feel that if 2 women on a ticket causes Trump to win then it doesn't say much good about whether the American experiment deserves to continue.

63splitwindow

(2,657 posts)

15. If ANYONE knows about breaking old, old barriers it would certainly be John Lewis... nt

Reply to forjusticethunders (Reply #13)

Sat Jul 16, 2016, 10:27 PM

Jul 2016

Lucky Luciano

(11,257 posts)

17. I would prefer Bernie, but I don't see two women as a problem. nt

Reply to 63splitwindow (Reply #11)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 11:11 AM

Jul 2016

red dog 1

(27,820 posts)

20. Normally, it might be "too much change in one step" to have 2 women on the same ticket,

Reply to 63splitwindow (Reply #11)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 01:05 PM

Jul 2016

but this year, considering the possibility of the racist, bigoted, Hitler protégé Donald Trump becoming POTUS, all bets are off; and choosing EW as her running mate will
a) Unite a now-divided Democratic Party
b) Insure that HRC will get the "millennial" vote, as well as the vast majority of the millions
of Dems who voted for Bernie
c) Likely get the votes of millions of Independents who might otherwise vote for a 3rd party
candidate like Jill Stein, because they, too, are afraid of a Trump presidency

packman

(16,296 posts)

16. Looking forward to her speech at the DNC

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 11:01 AM

Jul 2016

Fire and brimstone mixed with vision and hope.

GIVE EM' HELL, LIZ

bucolic_frolic

(43,182 posts)

18. We ARE Blessed

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 11:51 AM

Jul 2016

It's not just EW

Sometimes I don't know how we've hung on, or how we've done it,
considering the state legislatures and governorships imbalances, but
we have.

Despite the Fascist Gang of 17 that ran, and Senate and House minorities,
we, Democrats, have the surrogates of stature while the Super Majority
are a bunch of weasel-eyed, paranoid, mentally constricted lame brain
losers who couldn't raise a crowd in a church. Plus, they go on TV with the
sorriest excuses for logic, facts, and syllogisms that newsrooms have ever seen.
Plus we have a popular ex-president, and a popular incumbent president. The GOP
model dances like a drunken marionette and must have controlled venues to appear
in public.

They say it in sports - Dems have the horses.

rladdi

(581 posts)

19. I believe the RNC has chosen a losing team to lead our nation. And then

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 12:58 PM

Jul 2016

we have the Republican leaders in the House and Senate that do absolutely nothing to protect us. not debating the Syria war or ISIS crisis. It is a situation that should make sane American to think of who they want to be leaders.
The insane crisis for Clinton is the relentless attacks and investigations against her by the Republicans. They have attack the Clinton since the 1990s. And it continues today.

IgelJames4

(50 posts)

21. Warren is 100% spot on

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 02:14 PM

Jul 2016

Those two GOP morons are vile creatures. Their massive defeat this November will be well deserved.

SunSeeker

(51,572 posts)

22. K & R

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 03:23 PM

Jul 2016

raven mad

(4,940 posts)

23. K&R!

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 03:38 PM

Jul 2016

Rock ON, Senator Warren!

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Elizabeth Warren absolute...