Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Squinch

(50,955 posts)
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:24 PM Jul 2016

If you think choosing Kaine was a rebuke to the far left, you need to consider this:

The Vice President's job is largely ceremonial. They have little policy influence. In choosing Kaine, Hillary has essentially neutralized him. He is no longer part of the ratification process for any laws that will be passed, except in the extremely unlikely event of a tie.

So, if your primary objection to him is his position on the TPP or on banking, you should be very happy with his becoming VP.

Though he has promised to align his TPP position to Hillary's, and she has come out against the TPP, even if he hadn't, Kaine no longer has a vote to ratify the TPP. He also no longer has a say in whether any new laws to increase banking regulations will be passed. Or any other laws where you think he's too conservative.

Choosing Kaine for VP actually reduces the congressional support for the TPP and bank de-regulation.

And he is from a state with a Democratic governor, so the chances are high that someone more left leaning will get his Senate chair.

If you really dislike the positions the guy has taken as Senator, this pick should make you happy. His vote has been neutralized, the far left has been made stronger.

And he gets us Virginia.

69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If you think choosing Kaine was a rebuke to the far left, you need to consider this: (Original Post) Squinch Jul 2016 OP
that is pretty thin gruel yurbud Jul 2016 #1
That's nice, dear. Tell me again how I'm not a Democrat. Squinch Jul 2016 #2
So it would not matter then if she picked a person Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #14
She already has the Bernie supporters. 92% of them. A candidate geared to getting voters she Squinch Jul 2016 #23
We will see if she can keep them now Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #28
The vast majority are reasonable people. They certainly won't go to Trump, and the vast majority Squinch Jul 2016 #30
Depends on the state Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #31
Most Sanders supporters are smart, no matter what state they live in. Squinch Jul 2016 #33
Have you ever not voted Andy823 Jul 2016 #59
It is one of the many things that I and others Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #64
I wanted someone younger like Julián Castro. Rex Jul 2016 #3
I'd have liked Castro. But you are right. Squinch Jul 2016 #6
I'm just ecstatic practicing saying, "Madam President." Time to make history again! Rex Jul 2016 #10
I know. This is such a huge thing, and it feels like we haven't given it enough attention. Squinch Jul 2016 #15
For me it is my mom, she is getting close to 70 and all her life she has wanted to Rex Jul 2016 #20
Me too! I think she is going to surprise everyone, too, as President. Squinch Jul 2016 #22
Totally, I hear people say this and that about her and just SMH. Rex Jul 2016 #24
I think she will go much farther left than anyone thinks she will, too. Especially if Squinch Jul 2016 #26
It would be nice to have a person of color or woman or whatever but policy matters infinitely more yurbud Jul 2016 #9
I like Julián he was a great mayor for San Antonio. Rex Jul 2016 #12
Not according to Trump! imanamerican63 Jul 2016 #4
Or, sounds like a spoiled, lazy bum. Squinch Jul 2016 #32
Your first two sentences TheCowsCameHome Jul 2016 #5
I would have danced while I was voting for that ticket, but then yes. She would have been hobbled. Squinch Jul 2016 #7
warren as VP would be net loss for democrats as we would lose her senate seat and voice in the beachbum bob Jul 2016 #8
you think McAuliffe is going to appoint someone ibegurpard Jul 2016 #11
You think the republican governors in all the other VP contender's states would have Squinch Jul 2016 #17
The dead-enders need to remember economics are only half of what being a progressive means. CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #13
He's not stellar there either ibegurpard Jul 2016 #18
Does he not speak Spanish? Is mentioning that patronizing? Squinch Jul 2016 #21
Being bilingual is a strike against him? redstateblues Jul 2016 #56
Right? Squinch Jul 2016 #62
Look at his record on discrimination, civil rights, guns & abortion. He's rock solid. CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #25
He signed an bill making discrimination in marriage against LGBT a Constitutional element Bluenorthwest Jul 2016 #39
He also won the biggest award ever against a housing case... while Trump was discriminating. CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #40
You are incorrect it seems. ....check downthread. nt msanthrope Jul 2016 #60
FALSE - it was a voter initiative which he could not stop csziggy Jul 2016 #65
He does speak Spanish. MichiganVote Jul 2016 #27
"They have little policy influence" ansible Jul 2016 #16
Yes. That was an exception. But he is Satan, so things are different for him. Squinch Jul 2016 #19
Ask John Nance Garner how he feels about it. n/t malthaussen Jul 2016 #43
K&R liberal N proud Jul 2016 #29
There's also the issue of cabinet positions. GoCubsGo Jul 2016 #34
She's 68. There's a real chance he could wind up President. LeftyMom Jul 2016 #35
YES! nt (Ms Bigmack) Bigmack Jul 2016 #36
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #37
As Governor Kaine signed into law the Marshall-Newman Amendment, which defined Bluenorthwest Jul 2016 #38
so you going where on the ballot? Gabi Hayes Jul 2016 #41
I agree that this is one of the most disturbing of his positions that I have learned about Squinch Jul 2016 #46
Total lie. That became law by being ratified by the Citizens of VA. It was FSogol Jul 2016 #49
That is good to know. I fucked up. I trusted that poster, and I found his scenario very disturbing. Squinch Jul 2016 #54
Kaine signed exec order banning discrimination against gays in state jobs JI7 Jul 2016 #61
#6 - FALSE - it was a voter initiative and the governor did not sign it csziggy Jul 2016 #66
#13 - FALSE - it was a voter initiative, Governor Kaine did not sign anything csziggy Jul 2016 #67
"Rebuke" would be putting it strangely. malthaussen Jul 2016 #42
Yes. I only use the word because I have seen the choice characterized as a rebuke. Which, I agree, Squinch Jul 2016 #45
Slap in the face, maybe. malthaussen Jul 2016 #47
You yourself described above exactly what was the probable thought process. It's Squinch Jul 2016 #48
No, you misunderstand. malthaussen Jul 2016 #50
Oh. Yes, I understand what they are thinking, but it seems petulant to me. Squinch Jul 2016 #52
Mmm, one should be careful with such epithets, IMO. malthaussen Jul 2016 #57
. Squinch Jul 2016 #63
She won't keep her word on TPP. She'll suddenly discover that, upon closer inspection, Arugula Latte Jul 2016 #44
The simplest explanation is usually correct RandySF Jul 2016 #51
Unless he becomes president. Qutzupalotl Jul 2016 #53
As a Bernie supporter and Delegate to my state assembly randr Jul 2016 #55
No, the "far left" has not been made stronger. former9thward Jul 2016 #58
Rebuke? No, more like a sharp stick in the eye. Scuba Jul 2016 #68
I wonder how ceremonial Cheney and Biden's time as VP was? Exilednight Jul 2016 #69
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
14. So it would not matter then if she picked a person
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:33 PM
Jul 2016

more to the left that would help bring in the Bernie supporters.

Squinch

(50,955 posts)
23. She already has the Bernie supporters. 92% of them. A candidate geared to getting voters she
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:40 PM
Jul 2016

already has would not have made sense.

Squinch

(50,955 posts)
30. The vast majority are reasonable people. They certainly won't go to Trump, and the vast majority
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:55 PM
Jul 2016

are too smart to see a vote for Stein or Johnson as anything other than support for Trump.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
59. Have you ever not voted
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 05:35 PM
Jul 2016

For a presidential candidate simply because of who they picked for their VP? If so who?

Squinch

(50,955 posts)
15. I know. This is such a huge thing, and it feels like we haven't given it enough attention.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:34 PM
Jul 2016

I know I'm going to cry like a baby when she is inaugurated.

Like Obama. I watched his inauguration in a room with 30 black six-year-olds. I couldn't keep a tissue dry.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
20. For me it is my mom, she is getting close to 70 and all her life she has wanted to
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:37 PM
Jul 2016

see a women president. She is so excited and I am excited for her and for what we are going to get! Obama is correct, HRC is the most qualified person to be POTUS despite all the barkers declaring otherwise.

I can't wait Squinch! November cannot get here soon enough!

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
24. Totally, I hear people say this and that about her and just SMH.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:41 PM
Jul 2016

I think she is going to rock the boat big time! I think she is going to take it to the GOP in a fashion we've never seen before. I think she is going to put Congress on notice.

Squinch

(50,955 posts)
26. I think she will go much farther left than anyone thinks she will, too. Especially if
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:47 PM
Jul 2016

we give her the House, but I think that would take at least till her second term.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
9. It would be nice to have a person of color or woman or whatever but policy matters infinitely more
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:31 PM
Jul 2016

we can't afford more kowtowing to Wall Street and letting them set policy instead of set in jail cells.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
12. I like Julián he was a great mayor for San Antonio.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:33 PM
Jul 2016

He is still very young I hope his career keeps going up and up.

imanamerican63

(13,799 posts)
4. Not according to Trump!
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:28 PM
Jul 2016

He has an idea to let the VP do his job & he will "make America great again"! Sounds like a corporate big shot!

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)
5. Your first two sentences
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:28 PM
Jul 2016

make me feel so happy it wasn't Elizabeth Warren.

Other than bringing in some Sanders supporters, she would've been muzzled. Thanks for confirming that.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
8. warren as VP would be net loss for democrats as we would lose her senate seat and voice in the
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:30 PM
Jul 2016

Senate...way more important than a VP spot at this time...hopefully the far left will not put their egos first

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
11. you think McAuliffe is going to appoint someone
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:32 PM
Jul 2016

Who tends more towards economic populism than Kaine...

Squinch

(50,955 posts)
17. You think the republican governors in all the other VP contender's states would have
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:36 PM
Jul 2016

done better than McAuliffe?

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
18. He's not stellar there either
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:37 PM
Jul 2016

Please don't tell me you believe the patronizing nonsense about him speaking Spanish....

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
56. Being bilingual is a strike against him?
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 05:19 PM
Jul 2016

Jeez. I wish I had taken the time to learn another language.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
39. He signed an bill making discrimination in marriage against LGBT a Constitutional element
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 03:04 PM
Jul 2016

of Virginia law. He did so after promising as candidate to veto it. Let's deal in the reality of the man because this attempt to craft him into something he is not is exploitative of important history.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
65. FALSE - it was a voter initiative which he could not stop
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 07:14 PM
Jul 2016

The governor did not sign it and could not have stopped it.

SB 526 Constitutional amendment; marriage may exist only between a man and woman.

Constitutional amendment (voter referendum); marriage. Provides for a referendum at the November 2006 election on approval of a proposed constitutional amendment to define marriage. The proposed amendment provides that "only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this Commonwealth and its political subdivisions." The proposed amendment also prohibits the Commonwealth and its political subdivisions from creating or recognizing "a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance, or effects of marriage." Further, the proposed amendment prohibits the Commonwealth or its political subdivisions from creating or recognizing "another union, partnership, or other legal status to which is assigned the rights, benefits, obligations, qualities, or effects of marriage." This bill is identical to HB 101.

<SNIP>
03/15/06 House: Signed by Speaker
03/16/06 Senate: Signed by President
04/10/06 House: Bill became law without Governor's signature, Chapter 828 (effective 7/1/06)
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?061+sum+SB526


Emphasis added by me.

GoCubsGo

(32,086 posts)
34. There's also the issue of cabinet positions.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 01:35 PM
Jul 2016

Those have as much or more sway than does the VP. I think I would rather have some of these progressives as Interior Secretary, Sec. of Treasury, etc.

Kaine is a Mizzou grad. He could very well get us Missouri, too.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
35. She's 68. There's a real chance he could wind up President.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 01:40 PM
Jul 2016

Arguing that it's okay that his politics aren't great because VPs don't *do* anything is already a terrible argument, but it neglects that and that's huge.

Response to Squinch (Original post)

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
38. As Governor Kaine signed into law the Marshall-Newman Amendment, which defined
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 02:59 PM
Jul 2016

marriage as between one man and one woman, for Jesus. He did this after promising to veto it. He was also a long, long term opponent of civil unions as well as marriage equality.

It's just hard to vote for people who have exhibited open hostility toward your community over a long period of time. I'm sick of the Party asking that of me.

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
41. so you going where on the ballot?
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 03:14 PM
Jul 2016

you want somebody even worse than W?

I've held my nose, as I will this time, for over FORTY years, and voted the lesser of two evils...get used to it

the one exception was green in 96, when ILL was safe, and I wanted to help to open the way for a third party.....of course that's not going to happen, with the two party entrenchment, allowing money to buy their votes.

we see the result every day.

this is perhaps the most important stopgap vote ever. as I said, did anybody think bush could possibly be as bad as he was?

trump is certifiably INSANE! there is no limit to the havoc reached.

if he implodes before Nov, and the vote is assured, I might vote for someone else, but nobody on the horizon is qualified, IMO

that said, the volatility of today's world would militate any sure outcome.

the violence/lawnorder factor is too unpredictable.....out of anyone's hands

Squinch

(50,955 posts)
46. I agree that this is one of the most disturbing of his positions that I have learned about
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 04:25 PM
Jul 2016

so far. And I know that my idea about this is cynical, but if he is VP, he is out of the arenas where he could do this kind of thing.

FSogol

(45,488 posts)
49. Total lie. That became law by being ratified by the Citizens of VA. It was
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 04:49 PM
Jul 2016

a public referendum and never signed by the Governor. The courts threw it out. Stop spreading misinformation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall-Newman_Amendment

Squinch

(50,955 posts)
54. That is good to know. I fucked up. I trusted that poster, and I found his scenario very disturbing.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 05:05 PM
Jul 2016

Glad to know it was not reality.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
66. #6 - FALSE - it was a voter initiative and the governor did not sign it
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 07:25 PM
Jul 2016

The governor did not sign it and could not have stopped it.

SB 526 Constitutional amendment; marriage may exist only between a man and woman.

Constitutional amendment (voter referendum); marriage. Provides for a referendum at the November 2006 election on approval of a proposed constitutional amendment to define marriage. The proposed amendment provides that "only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this Commonwealth and its political subdivisions." The proposed amendment also prohibits the Commonwealth and its political subdivisions from creating or recognizing "a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance, or effects of marriage." Further, the proposed amendment prohibits the Commonwealth or its political subdivisions from creating or recognizing "another union, partnership, or other legal status to which is assigned the rights, benefits, obligations, qualities, or effects of marriage." This bill is identical to HB 101.

<SNIP>
03/15/06 House: Signed by Speaker
03/16/06 Senate: Signed by President
04/10/06 House: Bill became law without Governor's signature, Chapter 828 (effective 7/1/06)
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?061+sum+SB526


Emphasis added by me.

I'm sick of the lies - try so truth sometime.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
67. #13 - FALSE - it was a voter initiative, Governor Kaine did not sign anything
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 10:03 PM
Jul 2016

The governor did not sign it and could not have stopped it.

SB 526 Constitutional amendment; marriage may exist only between a man and woman.

Constitutional amendment (voter referendum); marriage. Provides for a referendum at the November 2006 election on approval of a proposed constitutional amendment to define marriage. The proposed amendment provides that "only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this Commonwealth and its political subdivisions." The proposed amendment also prohibits the Commonwealth and its political subdivisions from creating or recognizing "a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance, or effects of marriage." Further, the proposed amendment prohibits the Commonwealth or its political subdivisions from creating or recognizing "another union, partnership, or other legal status to which is assigned the rights, benefits, obligations, qualities, or effects of marriage." This bill is identical to HB 101.

<SNIP>
03/15/06 House: Signed by Speaker
03/16/06 Senate: Signed by President
04/10/06 House: Bill became law without Governor's signature, Chapter 828 (effective 7/1/06)
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?061+sum+SB526


Emphasis added by me.

I missed this lie earlier.

malthaussen

(17,204 posts)
42. "Rebuke" would be putting it strangely.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 03:27 PM
Jul 2016

My assessment is that she and her strategists are not particularly interested in courting the radical fringe, who are largely going to vote for her regardless. So they naturally picked someone who they thought would strengthen the ticket with undecided voters. Any dispassionate cost/benefit analysis would tell her she has more votes to gain with Kaine than she might lose. And if the choice makes it more likely she'll pick up VA's electoral votes, so much the better. He's pretty popular down there, I hear.

-- Mal

Squinch

(50,955 posts)
45. Yes. I only use the word because I have seen the choice characterized as a rebuke. Which, I agree,
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 04:22 PM
Jul 2016

is a silly way to look at it.

malthaussen

(17,204 posts)
47. Slap in the face, maybe.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 04:26 PM
Jul 2016

But not from punishment, just indifference. Which is the opposite of love.

-- Mal

Squinch

(50,955 posts)
48. You yourself described above exactly what was the probable thought process. It's
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 04:44 PM
Jul 2016

strange that, understanding it as well as you do, you would see it as a slap in the face.

Her ticket gains from this, and this isn't a game.

I don't think she was slapping anyone in the face. She is doing what she has to do, and that includes trying to appeal beyond the base. If you don't do that, you lose. So she has to do that.

malthaussen

(17,204 posts)
50. No, you misunderstand.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 04:50 PM
Jul 2016

I don't see it as a slap in the face, I do see why others might consider it so.

-- Mal

malthaussen

(17,204 posts)
57. Mmm, one should be careful with such epithets, IMO.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 05:20 PM
Jul 2016

They are unnecessary, and only reinforce the perception of being treated with contempt and dismissal.

-- Mal

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
44. She won't keep her word on TPP. She'll suddenly discover that, upon closer inspection,
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 03:38 PM
Jul 2016

it's the best thing since sliced bread and will deliver rainbows and chocolate chip cookies to all Americans.

Qutzupalotl

(14,317 posts)
53. Unless he becomes president.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 05:04 PM
Jul 2016
He also no longer has a say in whether any new laws to increase banking regulations will be passed. Or any other laws where you think he's too conservative.

Unless he becomes president, in which case he will have the final say. See the problem now?

If he stays a VP, fine. I was hoping she'd pick someone I could enthusiastically support when her terms are done. But there will be a primary then.

randr

(12,412 posts)
55. As a Bernie supporter and Delegate to my state assembly
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 05:08 PM
Jul 2016

I have always believed that Hillary plays to win and have always respected her ability to do so. I think she understands the consequences of a Democratic failure to hold the WH more than most and I believe she is qualified to make the decisions that will make our victory of the dark side of Trump a reality.
I believe Bernie understands this as well and knows that his responsibility is to help deliver the down ticket seats that we will need to put our ship of state on a progressive course.
After watching the roll out of Kaine I am more than assured we will see the end of Republican obstructionism and that an incredible celebration will follow Hillary's victory.

former9thward

(32,023 posts)
58. No, the "far left" has not been made stronger.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 05:20 PM
Jul 2016

Just silly. The VP has as much policy influence as the President wants. Did Joe Biden just tend to his garden for 8 years? Cheney was always accused here of being president for 8 years.

Exilednight

(9,359 posts)
69. I wonder how ceremonial Cheney and Biden's time as VP was?
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 07:27 AM
Jul 2016

That's rhetorical.

Cheney pretty much ran the Bush Presidency.

Biden was put in charge of Iraq and Afghanistan, and has fingerprints on several other key policy issues.

I wonder when running wars became ceremonial?


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you think choosing Kai...