Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

think

(11,641 posts)
Thu Jul 28, 2016, 09:08 AM Jul 2016

The US is sending troops to Iraq as Iraq prepares for a major battle soon.

U.S. combat adviser mission in Iraq expands to battalion level

Andrew Tilghman, Military Times 4:34 p.m. EDT July 27, 2016

~Snip~

Garver said the bridge is a big step in preparing to attack the ISIS stronghold of Mosul by linking the Iraqi army’s main logistics hub in the Kurdish-controlled town of Makhmur to the forward-operating base and airfield at Qayyarah.

“Connecting Qayyarah West air base and Makhmur will greatly improve maneuverability and shorten lines of communication for the [Iraqi Security Forces] as they prepare for the eventual assault to liberate Mosul,” Garver said.

~Snip~

There are about 4,100 U.S. troops authorized to deploy to Iraq. Top commanders say additional troops may be necessary for the final invasion of Mosul, which may begin later this year.

Read more:
http://www.militarytimes.com/story/military/2016/07/27/us-combat-advisor-mission-iraq-expands-battalion-level/87625432/




U.S. sending 560 more troops to Iraq as Mosul push intensifies

Lolita C. Baldor, The Associated Press 2:55 p.m. EDT July 11, 2016

BAGHDAD — The United States will send 560 more troops to Iraq to transform a freshly retaken air base into a staging hub for the long-awaited battle to recapture Mosul from Islamic State militants, Defense Secretary Ash Carter said Monday. The new American forces should arrive in the coming weeks.

Most of the engineers, logistics personnel, security and communications forces will concentrate on building up Qayara air base, about 40 kilometers south of Mosul. They will assist Iraqi forces planning to encircle and eventually retake the biggest city anywhere that has fallen under ISIS' control.

~Snip~

Obama in April allowed U.S. troops to assist Iraqi forces at brigade and battalion levels, where they could operate closer to the battle. They would still be behind front lines. They previously were limited to advising at headquarters and division levels, further away.

Despite recent battlefield successes, the Islamic State still controls large parts of Iraq. And it continues to launch deadly attacks, including a massive suicide bombing last week at Baghdad's bustling commercial area of Karada. As many as 186 were killed.

Read more:
http://www.armytimes.com/story/military/2016/07/11/iraq-us-troops-deploy/86938318/



More US Troops Likely to Be Sent to Iraq: Gen. Votel

Jul 21, 2016 | by Richard Sisk

The U.S. will likely commit more troops to Iraq to bolster local forces against “specific objectives” in the campaign to retake the last ISIS main stronghold at Mosul, Army Gen. Joseph Votel, commander of U.S. Central Command, said Wednesday.

“We will look to add additional capabilities that are necessary to accomplish our objectives,” Votel said. The extra troops would be in addition to the 560 recently authorized by President Obama to bring the Force Management Level to 4,657. “What we have tried to do is link our request for additional capabilities to specific objectives we’re trying to achieve,” he said.

Votel said the 560 troops authorized last week would be slated for deployment to the airfield called Quyara West about 40 miles southeast of Mosul, which was recently retaken by the Iraqis. The 560 troops have not begun to deploy to the airfield in any significant numbers, but Votel said he expected that to happen shortly.

Votel spoke with Defense Secretary Ashton Carter at a joint news conference following the opening session of a meeting of defense ministers of more than 30 nations in the anti-ISIS coalition at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on boosting their contributions to the campaign.

Read more:
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/07/21/more-us-troops-likely-to-be-sent-to-iraq-gen-votel.html



Pentagon Chief Sees Role for U.S. Contractors in Rebuilding Iraq, Syria

By Jon Harper - Today

FORT BRAGG, North Carolina – Contractors could play a major role in efforts to stabilize and rebuild cities in Iraq and Syria after they are recaptured from the Islamic State, Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter told reporters July 27 during a visit to meet with troops set to deploy to the Middle East.

The State Department, USAID and their coalition counterparts will be working with Iraqis and Syrians to provide humanitarian aid, support near-term stabilization and promote longer-term recovery, he noted during a speech to troops from the Army’s XVIII Airborne Corps, some of whom will help lead the U.S. component of the counter-ISIL campaign.

There will “absolutely” be a significant role for U.S. contractors once Islamic State strongholds like the Iraqi city of Mosul fall, he said in response to a question from a reporter.

“I do think that much of the reconstruction effort will be done by civil authorities, not the Department of Defense," he said. “That’s going to be a big job.”...

Read more:
http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=2261
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The US is sending troops to Iraq as Iraq prepares for a major battle soon. (Original Post) think Jul 2016 OP
Yes, they are... My brother in law has orders to go this fall. glowing Jul 2016 #1
That sounds like a long term plan for deployment. Thank you for the information. think Jul 2016 #3
ISIS isn't responding to polite invitations to leave Mosul BeyondGeography Jul 2016 #2
People should know our troops are being sent over in preparation for this. Should they not? think Jul 2016 #4
 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
1. Yes, they are... My brother in law has orders to go this fall.
Thu Jul 28, 2016, 09:14 AM
Jul 2016

Thankfully for him, he's medically retiring before deployment orders. And they say plan on two yrs back and forth in seevice.

BeyondGeography

(39,374 posts)
2. ISIS isn't responding to polite invitations to leave Mosul
Thu Jul 28, 2016, 09:19 AM
Jul 2016

In case you missed it.

Yes, it would be nice if the Iraqi military could do this on their own but comparatively easy tasks like winning back Ramadi and Fallujah have proven difficult.

Obama has taken a lot of heat for not taking a more hands-on approach to ISIS starting with their development in Syria. I think he was right to abstain, but freeing Mosul from murderous medieval rule not to mention what it would represent in terms of diminishing ISIS is worth it, IMO. A weakened Iraqi military is a situation he inherited but did not create. You are free to propose your own solutions, hopefully it's something more sophisticated than, "no more war."

 

think

(11,641 posts)
4. People should know our troops are being sent over in preparation for this. Should they not?
Thu Jul 28, 2016, 09:28 AM
Jul 2016

And why must the US always be the leader in middle east war?

Will we even declare this non war war or just call it a skirmish?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The US is sending troops ...