Giuliani is a nazi.

intersting question whether they should know. Generally it appears to be the policy that they should not. If they knew, they would drop out maybe via suicide attack and be replaced by someone with a clean record. It seems Rudy has not thought anything through.

The OP is very misleading.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/27/rudy-giuliani-calls-tagging-people-on-the-terror-watch-list-an-excellent-idea/

One of the terrorists who killed an elderly priest in France this week had been placed under house arrest after trying to travel to Syria last year. An electronic monitor that tracked his movement was temporarily turned off, according to Sky News, during which time he helped kill Father Jacques Hamel.

Rudy Giuliani, the former mayor of New York and an advisor to the campaign of Donald Trump, appeared at a Republican National Committee event on Wednesday, after which he was asked about the prospect of introducing a similar monitoring system for those on the terror watch list.

"I would think that's an excellent idea," Giuliani told NJ.com's Claude Brodesser-Akner. "If you're on the terror watch list, I should know you're on the terror watch list. You're on there for a reason."

implies otherwise (he did the interview and wrote the article):

singling out Muslims (which he did right here: Rudy Giuliani said on Wednesday that he thinks it’s an “excellent idea” to monitor Muslims on the federal watch list through electronic monitoring tags). If he had said anyone on the watch list, he wouldn't be having these problems. I'm EXTREMELY torn about this - given what happened to that priest.

From the article - words of the author of the article: Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani on Wednesday said he would be in favor of forcing Muslims on the federal government's terrorism watch list to wear electronic monitoring tags or bracelets for authorities to track their whereabouts.

From the article, actual quote of what Giuliani said
"I would think that's an excellent idea," said Giuliani, an adviser to Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump. "If you're on the terror watch list, I should you know you're on the terror watch list. You're on there for a reason."

He quite clearly does NOT single out Muslims. It would, of course, be wrong to do so.
He apparently responded to a question about the electronic bracelet that the Normandy attacker had - and I am not aware of any indication that this was based on his being Muslim.

I do not wish to be in the position of defending Giuliani - he has certainly not contradicted Trump, who has explicitly singled out Muslims for treatment that are probably unconstitutional. But I think that the author of that news article was spinning it for maximum effect. Repeating the hyperbole and expressing anger about the alleged behavior can lead to a boy who cried wolf situation.

and he made NO distinction when answering. That's my point.

If the question was "do you think we should tag people on the watch list like in France?" then his answer was more of a policy point (and even then not a good answer - given the number of false positives on that list).

If the question was "do you think we should tag Muslims like in France?" or even "do you think we should tag Muslims on the terror watch list like in France?" then it was a horrible question for a professional journalist to ask - the premise is wrong, and it would also have been a bad answer, as you suggest, for the reason of not calling out the bad question. So now we are speculating whether

1) the question was inappropriate and the answer failed to call it out, or
2) the question was appropriate but not paraphrased inaccurately in the article for sensationalist reasons.

In either case, the journalist messed up. Since he didn't provide the actual question to readers, we can't tell if it was 1 or 2. He might have provided more to WaPo- which is probably higher quality journalists - which, for whatever reason, didn't mention Muslims at all in their report.

1. Democratic Congressmen John Lewis


2. Senator Ted Kennedy


3. CNN Reporter Drew Griffin


4. 8-year-old Cub Scout Mikey Hicks and his father, who shares the same name


5. Journalist Stephen Hayes of the Weekly Standard


6. Lyman Latin, a disabled U.S. Marine veteran



7. 6-year-old Alyssa Thomas from Ohio


8. A two-year-old child


9. Former Air National Guard brigadier general, James Robinson


10. Third-grader James Robinson


11. Former U.S. attorney James Robinson


12. Actor David Nelson


13. Yusuf Islam, the singer formerly known as Cat Stevens

http://www.dailywire.com/news/6879/these-13-people-placed-terror-watch-list-will-blow-amanda-prestigiacomo

No?

So.....

I'm sick of the mantra "If you're on the list, you're on it for a reason" bullshit. Every human in the world named "Robert Johnson" is on the list. I find it difficult to believe that every single Robert Johnson alive, regardless of age is a "terror suspect".

Although, this Robert Johnson did write "Terraplane Blues", and that sounds an awful lot like Terror Plane.

"It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads"