Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWIRED: WikiLeaks Has Officially Lost the Moral High Ground
https://www.wired.com/2016/07/wikileaks-officially-lost-moral-high-ground/WikiLeaks Has Officially Lost the Moral High Ground
Emma Grey Ellis Date of Publication: 07.27.16.
What the heck is going on at WikiLeaks?
In the last two weeks, the font of digital secrets has doxed millions of Turkish women, leaked Democratic National Committee emails that made Hillary Clintons presidential campaign look bad but also suggested the site was colluding with the Russian government, and fired off some seriously anti-Semitic tweets.
In the last two weeks, the font of digital secrets has doxed millions of Turkish women, leaked Democratic National Committee emails that made Hillary Clintons presidential campaign look bad but also suggested the site was colluding with the Russian government, and fired off some seriously anti-Semitic tweets.
--------
WikiLeaks has endangered individuals before, but their release of the so-called Erdogan Emails was particularly egregious. The organization said that the infodump would expose the machinations of Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan immediately after the attempted coup against him, but instead turned out to be mostly correspondence and personal information from everyday Turkish citizens. Worse, it included the home addresses, phone numbers, party affiliations, and political activity levels of millions of female Turkish voters. Thats irresponsible any time, and disastrous in the week of a coup.
The incident exposed gross negligence, though its true that lots of publications (including WIRED) made things worse by failing to vet the leaks content and linking to the documents in their coverage. Zeynep Tufekci, a sociologist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (herself of Turkish descent), wrote an essay criticizing WikiLeaks and Western media outlets for endangering Turkish citizens, and WikiLeaks and their supporters turned on her, hard. Within five minutes they called me an Erdogan apologist, which speaks volumes to their lack of research, Tufekci says. And then they blocked me. So much for hearing something they dont like.
The incident exposed gross negligence, though its true that lots of publications (including WIRED) made things worse by failing to vet the leaks content and linking to the documents in their coverage. Zeynep Tufekci, a sociologist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (herself of Turkish descent), wrote an essay criticizing WikiLeaks and Western media outlets for endangering Turkish citizens, and WikiLeaks and their supporters turned on her, hard. Within five minutes they called me an Erdogan apologist, which speaks volumes to their lack of research, Tufekci says. And then they blocked me. So much for hearing something they dont like.
---------
WikiLeaks and Assange say they have no responsibility for the content they leak, and that no one has evidence that the sources of the DNC leak are Russian. But these leaks and tweets damage WikiLeaks credibility. If theyre not scrutinizing their own leaks on the base level of their content, its not hard to imagine that WikiLeaks could unwittingly become part of someone elses agenda (like, say, a Russian one). If you are a legitimate leaker, why go with WikiLeaks? You go with The Intercept or the New York Times, like they did with the Panama Papers says Nicholas Weaver, a computer scientist at UC Berkeley who studies the organization. Wikileaks is a pastebin for spooks, and theyre happy to be used that way.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1365 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WIRED: WikiLeaks Has Officially Lost the Moral High Ground (Original Post)
Alfresco
Jul 2016
OP
"WikiLeaks and Assange say they have no responsibility for the content they leak..."
randome
Jul 2016
#4
My post about asylum is wrong. He clearly is trying to get a role in a Star Wars movie.
underpants
Jul 2016
#8
apcalc
(4,465 posts)1. They are toast....
radical noodle
(8,003 posts)2. There is too much damage done to innocents
They're getting paid for it I guess, and once again it's all about money?
Chimichurri
(2,911 posts)3. Needed to be said
randome
(34,845 posts)4. "WikiLeaks and Assange say they have no responsibility for the content they leak..."
Wow. What paragons of virtue these deadbeats turned out to be. Nothing but fencers of stolen goods.
"Wikileaks: you steal and we click a button! Be all you can be!"
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
snooper2
(30,151 posts)5. because- Julian Assange is a self-important douchebag
oh, and he looks stupid too
underpants
(182,829 posts)8. My post about asylum is wrong. He clearly is trying to get a role in a Star Wars movie.
melm00se
(4,993 posts)6. Did they ever have it in the 1st place? n/t
underpants
(182,829 posts)7. Assange is trying to get asylum somewhere, anywhere
He must think that Putin will give it to him. He'll get tossed aside KGB style.