We had some really questionable results in Kentucky and Kansas last round.
Russian hackers seem to be the best in the world. I am worried.

I believe some are. Someone must have some research on this.
Maybe I am getting paranoid.

Those PLCs were not networked.

They'd have to be physically here, wouldn't they? We have a better chance of hacking theirs.

Against PLCs that were not networked?

I've said for a while that this election could be decided by who has the better hackers, Trump or Clinton.

The only saving grace to these easily hackable voting machines is that it's getting to the point where it's affecting BOTH sides. That means that something MIGHT get done about it. Democrats make a big show about hacked and stolen elections while campaigning and then the issue disappears after they get elected. Probably because the current way things are done benefitted the ones who were elected in both parties.

I'm not as concerned about the individual machines themselves as I am about the central servers that tally of all of the results.

I just hope there are many cross checks in place that could inform us that something has gone wrong.

Was I right back in July?!?!