Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge eases restrictions on defendants in armed Oregon occupation
Source: Reuters
World | Fri Aug 5, 2016 10:07pm EDT
Judge eases restrictions on defendants in armed Oregon occupation
BY ALEX DOBUZINSKIS
A federal judge ruled on Friday that eight anti-government militants facing criminal charges in the armed takeover of an Oregon wildlife center can now communicate with each other ahead of a trial set for next month.
The easing of restrictions imposed as a condition of the pretrial release of four defendants comes after defense lawyers in May accused jail officials of hindering meetings with some of their clients and not providing a confidential phone line.
The four released defendants were prohibited earlier this year from speaking among themselves or with the four others, who remained jailed on charges stemming from the 41-day armed occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in eastern Oregon.
U.S. District Judge Anna Brown in Portland, Oregon, ruled on Friday that all eight defendants are now "allowed to have contact with each other for the sole purpose of preparing for and participating in trial," set to begin Sept. 7.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Judge eases restrictions on defendants in armed Oregon occupation
BY ALEX DOBUZINSKIS
A federal judge ruled on Friday that eight anti-government militants facing criminal charges in the armed takeover of an Oregon wildlife center can now communicate with each other ahead of a trial set for next month.
The easing of restrictions imposed as a condition of the pretrial release of four defendants comes after defense lawyers in May accused jail officials of hindering meetings with some of their clients and not providing a confidential phone line.
The four released defendants were prohibited earlier this year from speaking among themselves or with the four others, who remained jailed on charges stemming from the 41-day armed occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in eastern Oregon.
U.S. District Judge Anna Brown in Portland, Oregon, ruled on Friday that all eight defendants are now "allowed to have contact with each other for the sole purpose of preparing for and participating in trial," set to begin Sept. 7.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-oregon-militia-idUSKCN10H026
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 534 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge eases restrictions on defendants in armed Oregon occupation (Original Post)
Eugene
Aug 2016
OP
ret5hd
(20,499 posts)1. Go ahead! Talk yourselves into perjury! We don't care!
JesterCS
(1,827 posts)2. I was just thinking this
Couldn't any phone calls they make to each other be subpoena material?
SCantiGOP
(13,871 posts)3. Wouldn't have to subpoena
There is no expectation of privacy when communicating in prison. They have the right to listen in to any and all conversations.
On edit: except conversations with attorneys. Those are protected and can't be listened to.