Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,900 posts)
Sat Aug 6, 2016, 07:25 PM Aug 2016

Judge eases restrictions on defendants in armed Oregon occupation

Source: Reuters

World | Fri Aug 5, 2016 10:07pm EDT

Judge eases restrictions on defendants in armed Oregon occupation

BY ALEX DOBUZINSKIS

A federal judge ruled on Friday that eight anti-government militants facing criminal charges in the armed takeover of an Oregon wildlife center can now communicate with each other ahead of a trial set for next month.

The easing of restrictions imposed as a condition of the pretrial release of four defendants comes after defense lawyers in May accused jail officials of hindering meetings with some of their clients and not providing a confidential phone line.

The four released defendants were prohibited earlier this year from speaking among themselves or with the four others, who remained jailed on charges stemming from the 41-day armed occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in eastern Oregon.

U.S. District Judge Anna Brown in Portland, Oregon, ruled on Friday that all eight defendants are now "allowed to have contact with each other for the sole purpose of preparing for and participating in trial," set to begin Sept. 7.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-oregon-militia-idUSKCN10H026
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge eases restrictions on defendants in armed Oregon occupation (Original Post) Eugene Aug 2016 OP
Go ahead! Talk yourselves into perjury! We don't care! ret5hd Aug 2016 #1
I was just thinking this JesterCS Aug 2016 #2
Wouldn't have to subpoena SCantiGOP Aug 2016 #3

SCantiGOP

(13,871 posts)
3. Wouldn't have to subpoena
Sat Aug 6, 2016, 08:30 PM
Aug 2016

There is no expectation of privacy when communicating in prison. They have the right to listen in to any and all conversations.

On edit: except conversations with attorneys. Those are protected and can't be listened to.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge eases restrictions ...