General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTipTok
(2,474 posts)I've seen some quality shots on my facebook feed of these athletes but I suspect I would get alerted on.
Hekate
(91,326 posts)rurallib
(62,538 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,866 posts)I just wish they would think outside the box when it comes to "uniforms." With figures like that they would look very cool in boy cut bottoms.
Brother Buzz
(36,532 posts)and while they may have played it in Santa Barbara early on, most will agree Santa Monica gets the bragging rights for introducing it on the West Coast.
The rumor the Hawaiians played a mean game of beach volleyball with coconuts instead of inflated balls is totally unsubstantiated.
WiffenPoof
(2,404 posts)Reminder Palm Park?
Hekate
(91,326 posts)So young, so cute.
WiffenPoof
(2,404 posts)...for 30 years. Worked at UCSB for 25.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)Became Olympic sports. I watched it last year and there was this guy in worse shape than me who was a medal contender.
I admit it's a skill set, but so is playing poker.
3catwoman3
(24,219 posts)...brief that they might as well just wear thongs.
TheDonnasRule
(67 posts)Response to TheDonnasRule (Original post)
Post removed
Ilsa
(61,722 posts)Well, almost. They get to wear long shorts and tank tops. I don't get why women don't have the same option.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)The women's are designed for the men watching the sport. Objectification of women in the olympics is nothing new, unfortunately.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,865 posts)The only requirement should be logos to indicate the country represented.
I know many women would also object if they were required to wear something like a bathing suit from the early 20th century.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)just as the men do.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,865 posts)... when women expose anything above the knees? I'm old school.
JOKING! I just think people have widely different ideas about what's appropriate.
Ex Lurker
(3,822 posts)The women could wear shorts and t shirts if they wanted to. Most of them choose bikinis. The Egyptian team wore a full length burka-type uniform.
RapSoDee
(421 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)might make them feel inadequate.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)TrogL
(32,822 posts)I'm still thinking nude diving would hurt if you got the angle wrong
Watch out for stereotypes
My wife likes them too
madville
(7,413 posts)They can wear shorts and sleeved/sleeveless shirts if they want to, it was changed for the 2012 games, was a news story that year.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,865 posts)So it's pretty much a non-issue then.
xmas74
(29,690 posts)outfits because it's what they're used to wearing at other competitions. If it's what you're comfortable in then I don't have an issue.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Ilsa
(61,722 posts)Eventually Summer Olympics will be back in the northern hemisphere during summer. The body suits will likely kill their chances of a medal shortly after they leave the dressing room.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)If it is wicking fabric, they could be cooler than someone wearing a bikini, since they don't have the sun shining on their skin.
I don't think that desert dwellers have been wearing full robes and long sleeves for millenia as a fashion statement.
marybourg
(12,658 posts)for medical reasons and who lives in the desert southwest, I agree with you. For driving in short sleeve shirts, I have pull on sleeves made of a synthetic with SPF of 50. I'm so much more comfortable when I pull them on, compared with having the sun, even with tinted windows , shining on my arms.
Ilsa
(61,722 posts)marybourg
(12,658 posts)but they come is several colors. They fit loosely but have knit wrists. If you're interested:
http://www.sunprecautions.com/product/31800
Ilsa
(61,722 posts)It isn't about the coverage, but that black absorbs vs reflects, and that it is close to the skin. The robes they wore were not tight.
I don't wear tight, dark wicking fabrics in the summer, just in cold weather.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Because the thermal conductivity of the clothing is also an issue and, again, there are some amazing performance fabrics.
As you note, "black absorbs vs reflects". In cooling the body, what you want is to move heat away from the skin. Bedouins found out a long time ago that black fabric does this better.
Now, if you are talking about cotton or linen, then loose fitting black clothing will work better than white clothing - but won't be a good choice for tight fitting clothing. The key is either movement or wind, causing convection to remove heat faster than radiative absorption:
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/1886/does-black-clothing-keep-you-cooler
...IF we are talking about traditional fabrics.
However, there are now "COLDBLACK" performance sport fabrics which do this:
http://www.schoeller-tech.com/en/textile-finishing-technologies/coldblack/#all
...and which has been picked up by a raft of performance clothing companies in a variety of sports.
Ilsa
(61,722 posts)rurallib
(62,538 posts)by a few moments of obscure sports.
PoutrageFatigue
(416 posts)Not sure, but I think it's worse than their London coverage, oh, and the whole 'every sport is streaming live online' does fuck all good if you're at work.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Oh, wait.
Angel Martin
(942 posts)Chellee
(2,108 posts)emulatorloo
(44,322 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Yowch!
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Bucky
(54,169 posts)with the losing team being sacrificed to Queztocoatl, the serpent God.
plus the Olympics would save money by not having to buy any silver metals for that event
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)It was the winning since the were considered more worthy to the gods.
But then, it seems all games would be 0-0.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)lapucelle
(18,441 posts)MineralMan
(146,375 posts)the high school girls had to wear at my high school in the early 60s.
Teehee....
3catwoman3
(24,219 posts)Ours were pale yellow. It was really humiliating when we would have the square dancing classes and have to wear them in front of the boys.
MineralMan
(146,375 posts)I guarantee it.
In the 60s square dancing was part of GYM.
I failed.
3catwoman3
(24,219 posts)...was marching. WTH!
1939
(1,683 posts)in Jr High School. It was one day a week and you wore street clothes. The other days, they pulled the massive divider doors across the gym to segregate by sex and you wore your gym shorts to participate in whatever the Phys Ed teachers had dreamed up for the week.
apcalc
(4,465 posts)MineralMan
(146,375 posts)My HS girlfriend looked adorable in one.
that exact uniform in the early - mid '70's. Only in green. They never fit me right because I was tall. Never could wear a one piece anything.
marybourg
(12,658 posts)In the 50's the bottom was "bloomer" style, with knee length legs ending in elastic (we did roll them up somewhat in public school. The parochial school girls had to wear then full length!)
MineralMan
(146,375 posts)Different times is all. Somehow, everything managed to work out, however people dressed. That's my point, really. Clothing doesn't really matter. The population just keeps growing. Whatever the,styles were, teenaged boys and girls managed to be fascinated by each other.
GOLGO 13
(1,681 posts)RandySF
(60,597 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,434 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,711 posts)Decidedly no!
I watched the Aussie women and (i think) Germany. That was pretty close until the Aussie women easily pulled away in the last 10 or 12 minutes.
The men whomped China by 55 or 60 points and then beat Venezuela by around 30.
There's no competition for either the of US teams.
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)Several European teams have NBA players on them. It can get interesting later on in the competition.
ProfessorGAC
(65,711 posts)Sorry Zip, but it won't get more interesting. The only team that can make things difficult for the USMNT is the USMNT. They played terribly and in a disinterested fashion against Argentina for one quarter. Then went on a 93 - 47 run the rest of the game.
It started when the "second team" (like there is such a thing with that group of talent) started playing defense.
France is playing shabbily and they have 3 NBA guys. The rest of the team is little more than US high school talent.
Same with Spain. If Spain had both Gasol brothers, maybe they could give the US a half, but everyone is toast playing the US team.
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)They'd better pick it up or they could be quite embarrassed.
ProfessorGAC
(65,711 posts)While i did forget about Australia, as i was thinking about the Euro and South American teams, they just quit playing defense.
Those teams aren't good enough, especially their reserves, to score 90 points in a 40 minute game if the US players applied themselves on defense. They're playing like the Globetrotters and not like NBA players.
Maybe they're coasting until the medal rounds, but they better get some defensive intensity.
I didn't expect a single game to be less than a 15 point win.
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)Sorry, the DU spell checker doesn't allow that expression. No really, I always think that the US team goes into the games with a significant entitlement complex.
RandySF
(60,597 posts)Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)chillfactor
(7,602 posts)are disgusting!
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)DLevine
(1,788 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)It must be rather constricting to allow for only two possibilities- the burka or the bikini (but only some men allow for two possibilities, "not ALL men!!"-- I've learned my lesson, little fella).
The rational mind is often on a voyage to demand of ourselves consideration for multitudes of possibilities, but I'm confident you'll allege your dogmatic choice as being open-minded and tolerant... or amusing (which could be more tortuous, hence more entertaining in and of itself)?
I look forward to that particular wee bit of bemusing justification.
TheDonnasRule
(67 posts)KelleyKramer
(9,036 posts)Just in case you didn't know
Separation
(1,975 posts)Just take a look at some of the middle eastern countries that play. I also saw another female team in shorts and tank tops just as the men.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)The human body is such a shameful thing. We need more modesty to stop the leering dogs.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)for leading men to ruin by exposing their hair, their bare limbs. I was about to say knees, but in Iran women get called whores for not wearing socks to cover their ankles.
Exposed hair is like begging for rape, and don't fool yourself that it is the men who get called "icky".
Squinch
(51,142 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)onenote
(42,988 posts)But don't expect it to be the majority view.
Calculating
(2,958 posts)We need to require these women to properly cover themselves. Perhaps look to Saudi Arabia for an example of a proper nation where modesty is valued...
Seriously though.. Have you guys thought that maybe these women aren't ashamed of their bodies and LIKE wearing the bikinis? Are all the bikini clad women on the beach sluts? Or is it just proper wear for the beach?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)TheDonnasRule
(67 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)And nothing spins up the outrage drive more than scantily clad people on tv
treestar
(82,383 posts)I think that is the point. That does not look comfortable. They are playing to play that sport, not to be proud of their body in that way. It would be interesting to ask them. Women on the beach are not playing a sport. It should be a uniform they don' have to be concerned about comments about their boob size, whether they have good enough skin (they aren't models) and the bottoms should not be skimpy so they'd be worried about shaving or having part of their butt hang out.
They aren't there to be ogled but to play that sport, so it's a fair question and your crap about the human body being disgusting is irrelevant. No feminist argues that the female body is disgusting, but you set up the straw Victorian man to ridicule.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)essentially the same old fashioned uptight finger-wagging, anti-sex morals panic and body-shaming.
If the players themselves object to the outfits, great. Then they should have the final say.
But if some people at home get mad, that's another story.
Also, the Olympics were originally done totally nude. People should get a grip and stop trying to stamp out things like healthy sexuality in the human animal.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)you're the one doing the finger-wagging. Expressing concern about the sexual objectification of women in sports does not make someone old-fashioned, uptight, anti-sex, or ashamed of the human body. Disagree all you want, but please leave out the name-calling.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)If not, then why does anyone else care?
Because they want to tell other consenting adults what to do.
I can come up with a lot of ways to describe that approach to existence, but it is what it is.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)It's true, they changed the rules so that the women do not have to wear bikinis. The fact that they ever were required to wear them in the first place speaks to the fact that female athletes are often seen as sex objects first, athletes second.
Just look at this thread- interesting that nobody is discussing the women's skill, just talking about how hawt they are. The men are admired for their skills first. Photos taken of the women often focus on body parts- plenty of bare butt cheeks. I see no crotch-shots of the male athletes.
All this has nothing to do with "consenting adults" and wanting to tell other people what to do. It's about a culture which tends to focus attention on a woman's sexual attractiveness more than her skills. Hell, look at what the Williams sisters in tennis have had to put up with, that they aren't feminine enough. The men aren't subjected to that shit.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)letting people make their own decisions.
I have no problem with crotch shots of the male athletes, either. (witness: "Hottest Olympic Diver EVER" etc) Personally I find the Olympics in general mind-numbingly boring, and if I want to look at scantily clad women I don't need to watch beach volleyball to do it.
The players should be the ones to decide what they should wear. You're worried about "culture", it's culture that is dictating things like full body coverings or death sentences for gay teenagers, in some countries.
Fortunately we have a culture which at its best values individual choice and freedom, as much as that may bug some people.
People find each other sexually attractive oftentimes on the basis of physical or superficial characteristics. That's not going away--- the human race doesn't need "saving" from its lustful urges, it's not a "problem" that is ever going to be "corrected" or eradicated......nor is it only limited to evil menz male gaze-ifying hawt women.
Shit, just look what happened when Justin Trudeau took his shirt off the other day.
https://twitter.com/LacyMB/status/762279627649867776
DLevine
(1,788 posts)That's what I'm talking about, cultures that hurt people who have no choice but to live within that culture.
You and I have more in common than not. I'm an atheist. I believe people should have consensual sex with anyone they want, and with as many people as they want. Why not? I agree, the human body is nothing to be ashamed of. I'm not "an authoritarian".
My concern is just this: that women are held to a different standard than men. Hell, look at Fox news (ok, maybe not). The women may or may not want to wear short skirts, but it is something expected of them. The men are fully dressed. If the men were expected to sit in short shorts with their junk hanging out, at least then it would be fair.
I'm not telling any individual what to do, I'm just talking about a culture that is often unfair to women. Peace.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)It's better than it used to be (FOX News notwithstanding) but I would agree that it's not there yet.
My ideal is a world where everyone pretty much does what they want insofar as everyone is a consenting adult and they aren't directly hurting or endangering anyone else, and that includes wearing what they want. Hell, where I live the weather seems to be the sole external determinant of what people do or don't wear, and even then it functions more as "good advice" than strict edict.
In professions where some uniform is mandated the standards should apply equally or equivalently to everyone, to be sure.
Peace to you, too.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)Good talking with you, Warren.
treestar
(82,383 posts)what makes it easiest to excel in the sport. Regardless of its reflections on their sexual attractiveness. I did notice that the bathing suits the swimmers wear now go down to their legs. I don't think they are ashamed of their bodies, they think they will swim faster.
And that example where the Egyptian girl is playing with more covering proves that the outfit does not advantage them in playing in any way.
As to their own decisions, they only make them under pressure of the usual sexism in society. Yes they could decide to wear more but that takes standing up to accusations of being prudish and all that shit - these people just want to play the sport and probably put up with a certain amount of BS to be able to do it.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)bikinis.
So it should be up to them, not random observers who are bent out of shape because they fear someone may get aroused watching the game on tv.
treestar
(82,383 posts)lol. I do not. That's what they feel they have to say.
Maybe to wear to the beach, but not to play a sport at Olympic level.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Every time someone makes a choice one doesn't agree with, they don't actually feel that way or aren't really capable of voluntarily making the choice.
Therefore, it's just trying to help em out, no matter what they say to the contrary.
Rinse. Repeat.
jack_krass
(1,009 posts)They don't, and if they did, they have options to wear other outfits.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)They appear to be completely comfortable and focused.
RobinA
(9,940 posts)and no way are they comfortable when moving about. I loved my bikinis, but if I was going to do anything requiring serious movement, jumping waves, boating, I wore a suit that was less prone to wardrobe malfunction.
3catwoman3
(24,219 posts)Speaking only for myself, I know I would find it very annoying/distracting to have something riding halfway up my butt cheeks all the time - a constant wedgie-in-progress. I hate it when underwear does that.
Peregrine Took
(7,422 posts)Happened to me when I ran with bikini undies under my running shorts. Yes I wear both (!) No more.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)These are not your off-the-rack bikinis, but are made from fabrics which stretch, move and wick moisture.
treestar
(82,383 posts)when they have to move about, when looser clothing will tend to be better for moving in a sport.
Ex Lurker
(3,822 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)about what they are wearing.
At any rate, some girl is going to come along and be talented at the sport and not want to wear it - might be a bit more muscular and less skinny. I'm glad that person will not have to wear it - who wants the team to include not the people most talented, but the ones who look best in the outfit. That's what feminism would be concerned about. Not the bullshit about being ashamed of the body.
Ex Lurker
(3,822 posts)most of them were wearing tights and/or t shirts.
Skittles
(153,538 posts)and why aren't the male anchors and meteorologists going sleeveless?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Honestly, for some of us it's nothing short of a crime to keep these guns covered up, yo.*
*full disclosure: I have never referred to my biceps as guns non-ironically
Response to Calculating (Reply #33)
DLevine This message was self-deleted by its author.
a female who wore many a bikini in her day, it's not about the body exposure it's about the discomfort, at least for me, of flopping around in the sand trying to practice a sport, on camera, with a sandy bikini bottom riding up my butt.
I've always thought that one of the large differences between men's and women's fashions, in all walks of life, is the amount of discomfort women will put up with versus men. Somehow you never see men wearing anything that they have to constantly adjust to keep from showing it all in public.
Squinch
(51,142 posts)Motley13
(3,867 posts)equestrian coming up
StevieM
(10,501 posts)So far today I have seen Men's Soccer and Women's diving. Now they have women's gymnastics about to start.
Also, are you limiting your viewership to NBC? They are also showing events on MSNBC and CNBC.
TheDonnasRule
(67 posts)brooklynite
(95,350 posts)Pachamama
(16,888 posts).....Women's Beach volleyball....Germany v Egypt:
http://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2016/08/07/can-you-spot-the-difference-as-egypt-takes-on-germany-in-beach-volleyball/
...Germany won in straight sets. The Egyptian women played well. But the entire time, despite it being played at night when it's cooler temps, there was no doubt as one watched all of them, who was wearing the uniform that allowed for sweating and breathability, even if the material the Egyptian team was state of the art...
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Fuck, the original Olympics were played in the nude.
I can only imagine the nuclear meltdown level shit-losing that would provoke.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)As far as I am aware no women competed in the "original Olympics." And Greek culture was wildly different from modern culture. Hey, they had slaves, to start with.
So it's sort of a weird argument anyway.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)NBC evidently selects only the events they think will get them the most viewers, but all the other sports are available, you just need to find which channel they're on. I've watched archery, kayaking, equestrian, fencing, cycling, swimming and diving, even table tennis, either online or on one of the other stations.
The schedule of events is here:
http://www.nbcolympics.com/tv-listings
The list by each sport is here:
http://www.nbcolympics.com/live-stream-schedule
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)And both genders appear to be wearing beach attire. It's also my understanding that the women can wear shorts if they so choose. What I'm taking away from some of the comments is that it's not the athletes who are uncomfortable....
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Orrex
(63,349 posts)To the grocery store, to the bank, to funerals, you name it.
Maybe not while welding or when attending PTA meetings, but otherwise? Absolutely.
Dr. Strange
(25,934 posts)So why did you wear that speedo to the Library Bake Sale?
Kids were crying!
Orrex
(63,349 posts)Ergo...
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Just sayin'...
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,854 posts)I haven't seen any broadcasts of that sport yet.Saw a lot of swimming and gymnastics.
Saw Katie Ledecky set a world record in the 400 meter freestyle.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)This is what is so infuriating about this.
I know the only reason those are the official uniforms is to make them eye-candy and get ratings.
But once again, WOMEN ARE NOT PROPERTY FOR MEN (or anyone) TO OGLE. Why in the fucking hell is that so hard to understand?
Sleazy fucking thread.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Only a monster would ever look at a woman and become aroused. There should be PSAs every 10 minutes on TV: "Quit finding women physically attractive". Perhaps we should even consider mandatory castration, just to make sure.
PoutrageFatigue
(416 posts)...you know...just to be sure...
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)But at least I can sing with a high voice!
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Of course it can be hard to tell, at times, around here. After all it was just a few years ago that some people were calling the sports illustrated swimsuit issue, for everloving fuck's sake, a "horrific human rights atrocity" that "ruined my whole month".
So it can be hard to gauge, of course, when people are putting ya on. Particularly in regards to becoming blinded with rage over bathing suits an' shit.
But hey--- if folks have mellowed out since then, more power to 'em.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)davidn3600
(6,342 posts)Female reporters on the Today Show were actually oiling him up on Live TV. Switch the genders and have male reporters oiling up female athletes in bathing suits and feminists would be screaming.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)This is an absolute outrageeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
treestar
(82,383 posts)Whatever he does, he is still about what he does, not about his sexual attractiveness and if he did not have it but still had his athleticism, nobody would comment.
GOLGO 13
(1,681 posts)And be demand, I mean pay me no mind. The tight, taut, female athlete in all it's natural form is not to be coveted under the guise of "sport".
I know what your all doing & I do NOT approve. And, by not approve, I mean I very, very, much approve.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)underpants
(183,289 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Leave it to you to pick up on the important Olympics trivia.
underpants
(183,289 posts)ENGLISH equestrian William Speed Lane Fox-Pitt
Chinese trampolinist Dong Dong
Croatian water polo goalie Marko Bijac - pronounced BeeYatch
MFM008
(19,857 posts)Said if those pants went any farther up they would be tampons......
3catwoman3
(24,219 posts)...a hoot!
MFM008
(19,857 posts)TheDonnasRule
(67 posts)...both indoor and outdoor.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Some people wouldn't travel at all.
OxQQme
(2,550 posts)before his twin titties speech.
TheDonnasRule
(67 posts)...all is good with the World
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Because let's be honest, that is the reason most people are watching it.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Half of DU is offended that the volleyball players have skimpy uniforms.
The other half of DU is offended by women NOT wearing skimpy uniforms:
Personally, if I was going to get sweaty and dive into the sand on a regular basis, the Egyptian outfits make more sense to me - wicking UV-block fabrics for the heat, sun protection and abrasion resistance.
These are athletes competing, and people want to argue about what they are wearing, because they are women.
Separation
(1,975 posts)It's just like it is for every damned thing in this world. I swear to spaghetti monster that the freaking Internet was invented so one engineer team could bitch and moan about the other engineer team down the hall from them.
Quite frankly the person who started arguing about this thread go exactly what they were looking for. All the attention of an Internet thread. I'll be sure to send them a trophy and a letter of appreciation.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Into a "Westernization" litmus test.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I think tolerance is preferable to bigotry. I think openness is preferable to repression. I think nude bike rides and recreational weed dispensaries are preferable to outlawing alcohol and chewing gum, and sending the ministry of vice and virtue out to brutally club anyone who displays an inch of exposed leg skin.
I think living in a country where consenting adults can log onto youporn.com and watch other consenting adults fuck is vastly preferable to living in one where a teenager gets put to death for being gay.
Shit, I guess that makes me a xenophobe.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)...being accused of "hating western values", and to freely practice their religion.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Unlike some people.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Explaining the reason that those bikinis became the standard outfit (using the sexual objectification of women to get viewers) is not the same as saying as telling athletes what they should or should not wear.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)were you in the room when the outfits were designed?
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)The men wear normal athletic attire, the women are wearing bikinis. Use some logic here.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)For a sport played on the beach?
Again, the players should be the ones to decide, not you.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)you can't do that?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)objectification, hypersexualization, all natural, no chemical additives, etc.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)And slapping an authoritative sounding scary-sounding word on the commonplace phenomenon of sexual attraction on the basis of physical appearance still doesn't make it anything other than the commonplace phenomenon of sexual attraction on the basis of physical appearance.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)It is not about sexual attraction in and of itself, it is about reducing women into being a mere object of sexual fantasy.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)To categorize certain kinds of physical attraction as "bad".
"Reducing women into being a mere object of sexual fantasy"- what does that even mean? How are sexual fantasies inherently reductive? How do you know what happens in the head of every person who has a sexual fantasy? How do you know that people watching volleyball are having sexual fantasies because the players are in bikinis?
I could go on, really.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)will often get you the kind of attacks you might expect from Freeperville. You will be called a prude, anti-sex, opposed to free choice, wanting women to wear burqas, etc. It will be explained to you in no uncertain terms that your issue is insignificant, and that you are calling women in bikinis sl*ts. Anything but discuss the issue itself, which is actually a valid, progressive issue.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)People who think the rights of women and POC are a distraction and the economic issues of white men are the only thing that matters. I was a Bernie supporter in the primaries and the Bernie camp was full of such people.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)How the everloving fuck does telling these women that you know better than they do what they "should" be wearing for this sport they've dedicated years of their lives to playing constitute standing up for their rights?
You would think in all this time they might have figured out for themselves if the bikinis bother them, without having some rando show up to "edcuate" them by tossing undergrad buzzwords their way.
Yes, i think people should be free to make their own choices and I think they dont need self-appointed betters to correct their bad behavior. That's "regressive", lol.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)First off, by complaining about the outfits you most certainly are telling them what to do. If i had complained about the egyptian team's outfits, you bet your bippy I would be accused of xenophobically shaming them for their cultural tradition or whatever.
But i didnt do that, because the egyptian outfits dont bug me. Dont care. They should wear what they're comfortable wearing. Period. End of fucking story.
But the questions.
How do you know that every person who looks at the Volleyball players and even enjoys their physical attractiveness, is having a sexual fantasy about the volleyball players?
How do you know what takes place in the head of every single person who experiences a sexual fantasy?
How are sexual fantasies inherently "reductive"?
How are bikinis not "normal" sports attire for a sport played on a beach?
opiate69
(10,129 posts)Ugh.. the more things change....
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Yep, Takin' the old Orwell non-ironically, as an instruction manual.
GOLGO 13
(1,681 posts)I think I need help. And by help, I mean does anyone have the schedule as to when they play again?
panader0
(25,816 posts)It looks like you could crack an egg on her ass.
Ex Lurker
(3,822 posts)where body shaming qualifies as progressive if done in the name of Islam, and western women are considered oppressed for wearing attire of their own choosing.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)The bizarro Universe where the height of totalitarian oppression is having to live in a country where other people can buy the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue at Walgreens.
liberal N proud
(60,365 posts)4 days now!
DLevine
(1,788 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,711 posts)While i certainly get your point and can't disagree about women's issues, either the premise or their importance on DU, i've been reading this thread on and off for a couple days now, and that begs the question:
What is the women's issue as it pertains to these outfits?
NBC is showing lots of different stuff on lots of channels, and the US women's team is one of the favorites to win the gold. Seems only natural they would show a US team, particularly is that team is a contender.
This thread has made it clear that these women have the choice as to what the uniform would be. They made this choice.
Seems like people are looking to make this into an issue about women's rights, when these hard working, world class athletes made a decision that they don't particularly like.
So, sincerely asking: what is the women's issue here?
I honestly am not getting how the concept applies to this situation.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)It's part of our culture. It has ZERO to do with any individual woman's choice of clothing. It's about the culture of, very often, treating women as sexual objects rather than whole human beings. If you really are interested, you'll find plenty of information about it on the internet.
I can't believe I'm having to defend the fact that the objectification of women in our culture is a valid issue on a Democratic site.
ProfessorGAC
(65,711 posts)These women made the choice of uniforms. It begs the secondary question as to whom is doing the objectifying.
Hint: It's not me.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)It was written in 2012 by Sarah J Jackson regarding the Olympics of that year.
"In fact, one of the most talked about issues leading up to the Olympics this year was whether or not the womens beach volleyball competitors would be able to wear bikinis, given the cool British weather. To be clear, it is not the bikinis themselves that are the problem in fact, women beach volleyball players have reported feeling great pride in their bodies and the beach culture they come from, and they should. Rather, the problem lies in the fact that these incredible athletes who have worked hard and accomplished more than many people ever will in their lives continue to be valued primarily for the way their bodies look in said bikinis. The result is that media coverage of the event became nearly all about the bikinis instead of the women who play it. For example, NBCs New York affiliate ran the headline Olympic Beach Volleyball: Great Bodies, Bikinis and More. Well gosh, what could the and more possibly be? World-class athletes at the top of their game representing their nation under tremendous pressure and doing it with focus and clarity maybe? Apparently none of that is headline-worthy."
That is the only point I was trying to make.
treestar
(82,383 posts)And that women are paid less because they choose the jobs that pay less. The choice is made under certain pressures, situations, societal circumstances.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)which, of course, would be relevant to discussions about volleyball players choosing to wear the bikinis. If the compaints actually, you know, exist.
If there are, funny that no one has posted a link to them. Perhaps another one of those cases where someone with a few too many ounces of omniscince knows what is in someone else's head better than they themselves do.
I looked for complaints, all I found was this:
http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/China/story?id=5589206&page=1
Sand Where the Sun Don't Shine
Holly McPeak, a three-time Olympics beach volleyball player and winner of the bronze medal at the 2004 Athens games, said she'd pick the bikini over the one-piece every time.
"It's not even close," she said. "There's so many reasons for it."
Olympic Beach Volleyball: Women Prefer Bikinis
Not only are they more comfortable, the bikinis allow for a greater range of motion. One-pieces also have the unfortunate side effect of trapping sand where it doesn't belong.
"When you dive, the sand goes down the top and collects in the bottom," McPeak, 39, said.
IronLionZion
(45,775 posts)If you want to ogle and sexualize someone, Google can help you out. I prefer more feminine curvy women. I don't get my jollies from watching sports. I respect the sport and feel patriotic supporting our national and local teams. If team Maryland/DC/Virginia were it's own country we would have the third most medals after rest of USA and China.
I don't know how to support female athletes while blindfolded, so I stopped caring what feminists think of me. In school, I often went to the women's games for ice hockey, soccer, and basketball, to support my female classmates. My feminist girlfriend at the time was so sure I must have gone to ogle the women, because we all know how sexy ice hockey is.
Athletic women tend to be lean, muscular, and high testosterone. You know what kind of people value strong powerful women and find them sexy? Feminists are the ones ogling Olympic athletes and sexualizing them. They can't stop thinking about it and writing about their outfits being designed by the patriarchy. You should see their responses to the male swimmers and divers, who show the most skin of anyone and tend to have the types of bodies women like.