Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,991 posts)
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 09:21 AM Aug 2016

McConnell: "one of my proudest moments" was when I told Obama "you will not fill this Supreme Court"

So far, Senate Republicans are on track to set the record for forcing the longest Supreme Court vacancy within the past 50 years.

McConnell has promised to shut down any and all discussion of filling the vacancy, even after President Obama nominated Judge Merrick Garland, a very well qualified judge with years of deep bipartisan support.

Back in March, McConnell’s penchant for obstruction earned him the title of most hated political figure in America according to Public Policy Polling.

On Saturday, McConnell spoke at an event in Fancy Farm, Kentucky, where he declared:

one of my proudest moments" was when I told Obama "you will not fill this Supreme Court


http://www.ifyouonlynews.com/politics/mcconnell-one-of-my-proudest-moments-was-telling-obama-i-wouldnt-do-my-job-now-video/
102 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
McConnell: "one of my proudest moments" was when I told Obama "you will not fill this Supreme Court" (Original Post) kpete Aug 2016 OP
Hitler only dreams of a 5th column like we have DonCoquixote Aug 2016 #1
Hope he's just as proud malaise Aug 2016 #2
Exactly! His delay can be his legacy. Hortensis Aug 2016 #62
Damn I hate that guy. Rustyeye77 Aug 2016 #3
Me, too lillypaddle Aug 2016 #52
Yeah, MyOwnPeace Aug 2016 #87
proudest moments?...fuck you mitch. history will not be kind to you. spanone Aug 2016 #4
I don't think history bothers him one bit madokie Aug 2016 #9
Some people take pride in a job well done ... surrealAmerican Aug 2016 #32
Put that on his epitaph. kentuck Aug 2016 #5
The last I've heard, congress is paid by American taxpayers Iliyah Aug 2016 #6
In a real workplace they ALL would have been fired long ago for incompetence and obstruction. RKP5637 Aug 2016 #11
Ha, ha! MyOwnPeace Aug 2016 #88
Hear, hear! smirkymonkey Aug 2016 #39
It's a tossup, who is the biggest asshole, McConnell or Trump! n/t RKP5637 Aug 2016 #7
Yep, that's really a hard one to resolve... Cooley Hurd Aug 2016 #10
One is quiet, the other loud, but bottom line is the same, supreme racist pig assholes. n/t RKP5637 Aug 2016 #13
We used to call it LakeArenal Aug 2016 #74
Well, look at it this way........ MyOwnPeace Aug 2016 #89
I hope Hillary appoints Obama to the Supreme Court Happyhippychick Aug 2016 #8
K&R!!! n/t RKP5637 Aug 2016 #14
That would be nice if Obama wanted it. Stellar Aug 2016 #28
Even better PatSeg Aug 2016 #38
I'd like that. Or else appoint the most liberal, healthy 18 year old she can find. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #60
Yep! Happyhippychick Aug 2016 #67
Sigh... LakeArenal Aug 2016 #75
Yeah, both him and Obama! Happyhippychick Aug 2016 #77
He might yet if HRC wins--they might take Garland thinking that HRC might book_worm Aug 2016 #12
That begs a question... Cooley Hurd Aug 2016 #17
She can nominate anyone she wants. Lochloosa Aug 2016 #18
The nomination expires Jan. 20, but unblock Aug 2016 #27
The Senate dems should be dicks and filibuster... Volaris Aug 2016 #50
They should, but unblock Aug 2016 #61
Right cause optics are what we care about Volaris Aug 2016 #63
it's not about the optics, i'm with you on that; it's about governance. unblock Aug 2016 #65
I agree with all that. Volaris Aug 2016 #68
He's proud he's getting paid for not doing his job? DLevine Aug 2016 #15
He's proud of blocking the will of the American People... Wounded Bear Aug 2016 #16
That's it gratuitous Aug 2016 #22
Undermining the Constitution bucolic_frolic Aug 2016 #71
Gawd, MyOwnPeace Aug 2016 #90
That oath they take sorefeet Aug 2016 #19
And he is running for grubbs Aug 2016 #20
I hate that turtle! Buckeye_Democrat Aug 2016 #21
Silmy right wing tactic since day one! imanamerican63 Aug 2016 #23
Tell me of your love for the U.S. Constitution again Mitch. Botany Aug 2016 #24
You are right. Mitch is violating the US Constitution. raging moderate Aug 2016 #30
Because by in large the media is owned by the GOP. Botany Aug 2016 #37
They are violating norms, not the Constitution itself. tritsofme Aug 2016 #56
Remark 2:26 of this speech exboyfil Aug 2016 #25
Don't count your turtle eggs before they hatch SummerSnow Aug 2016 #26
What a colossal prick Va Lefty Aug 2016 #29
What he really said--- randr Aug 2016 #31
He thinks he will be remembered. Greybnk48 Aug 2016 #33
I will laugh so hard when Hillary puts edhopper Aug 2016 #34
"one of my proudest moments" was when I told Obama "you're dealing with total assholes" milestogo Aug 2016 #35
Is it any wonder 73% of Americans think Enoki33 Aug 2016 #36
"Hopefully?" MyOwnPeace Aug 2016 #91
And if we don't kick him out of the majority leader's office it will sit vacant another 2 years tritsofme Aug 2016 #40
Second only to vowing on the evening of Obama's first inauguration to never tblue37 Aug 2016 #41
I can't help but think of Clint Eastwood who can't understand why Obama isn't working with congress Johonny Aug 2016 #42
Of Obama and McConnell, which one... Orsino Aug 2016 #43
Fuck you Mitch!!!! Initech Aug 2016 #44
BHO enid602 Aug 2016 #45
Oh dude, you are not thinking clearly here jmowreader Aug 2016 #86
I would love blueknight Aug 2016 #46
I'll gladly step in when you're tired. sarae Aug 2016 #78
And.... MyOwnPeace Aug 2016 #92
ROFL! sarae Aug 2016 #94
Assuming Hillary wins and we also take the Senate, Obama needs to immediately Vinca Aug 2016 #47
And senate dems are virtually silent. nt awoke_in_2003 Aug 2016 #48
Enjoy history's villification, Turtle Boy. You damn sure earned it. (nt) Paladin Aug 2016 #49
I'm kind of surprised Mitch McFuckstick managed to keep from adding the N word to that statement. 47of74 Aug 2016 #51
Dishonest member of congress who does not deserve his job. AllyCat Aug 2016 #53
With all due respect to garland.... Takket Aug 2016 #54
Spot on! I couldn't agree with you more. DLevine Aug 2016 #57
I hope Garland ... JustABozoOnThisBus Aug 2016 #64
Bleccchh. madamesilverspurs Aug 2016 #55
they will all vote for Trump because they want the Supreme Court!! IcyPeas Aug 2016 #58
UNCONSTITUTIONAL man. pansypoo53219 Aug 2016 #59
Just... unbelievable ailsagirl Aug 2016 #66
he is a racist piece of shit Skittles Aug 2016 #69
This guy is fucked up. Not to McCain-you weren't hired to sit on Sunday am shows, you're MichiganVote Aug 2016 #70
This is why we have to give HRC a Democratic Senate... I have no doubt Still In Wisconsin Aug 2016 #72
His proudest moment is not doing his Constitutional duty! muntrv Aug 2016 #73
The republicans gotta go Calculating Aug 2016 #76
When pollsters ask the question "Is America going on the wrong track?" Loki Aug 2016 #79
Guess he likes getting paid for doing nothing. lark Aug 2016 #80
His proudest moment is when he didn't do his job? That is pretty sad. AgadorSparticus Aug 2016 #81
On a "reality" show..... MyOwnPeace Aug 2016 #93
How about all the other judgeship vacancies?? Angry Dragon Aug 2016 #82
Is it me or does Mitch remind you of the heckler from Happy Gilmore? Initech Aug 2016 #83
If I were Obama I'd look him right in the eye and say: forest444 Aug 2016 #84
Most human beings in the work place have to sign turbinetree Aug 2016 #85
I absolutely detest this POS. N/T Upthevibe Aug 2016 #95
Whatever semantics we use he and Ryan and others should not be in power turbinetree Aug 2016 #98
That's all these fuckers know how to do Scalded Nun Aug 2016 #96
Why do I feel like he wanted to end that statement with a particular slur ProudToBeBlueInRhody Aug 2016 #97
So if they are the party of no, why not give them what they ask for? greymattermom Aug 2016 #99
Karma that a CLINTON will likely fill helpisontheway Aug 2016 #100
What a "sick" fuck!!!! tartan2 Aug 2016 #101
So He Must Be itcfish Aug 2016 #102

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
1. Hitler only dreams of a 5th column like we have
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 09:23 AM
Aug 2016

Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason?
Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
9. I don't think history bothers him one bit
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 09:33 AM
Aug 2016

as little boots put it, "we'll all be dead then"


I just hope American voters wake the hell up and vote these assholes out of the majority. If anyone can't see what the hell is going on they're blind, simple as that.

We need at least a 61 majority of Democratic party members in our Senate going forward.

surrealAmerican

(11,360 posts)
32. Some people take pride in a job well done ...
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 10:54 AM
Aug 2016

... but Senator McConnell takes pride in a job not done.

It says something about him, and that something is not good.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
6. The last I've heard, congress is paid by American taxpayers
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 09:30 AM
Aug 2016

and suppose to work on behalf of the USA's people. The GOP do not do that but instead only works for the Republican party. They must be voted out as soon as possible.

RKP5637

(67,108 posts)
11. In a real workplace they ALL would have been fired long ago for incompetence and obstruction.
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 09:34 AM
Aug 2016

They, are a bunch of free loaders, republican hogs at the trough.

MyOwnPeace

(16,926 posts)
88. Ha, ha!
Mon Aug 8, 2016, 07:04 PM
Aug 2016

Trump meeting with these a$$holes and shouting, "You're fired!"

Oh, that's worth SO much to see!!!

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
39. Hear, hear!
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 12:25 PM
Aug 2016


And even then, only a small minority of the republican party. It's a pity so many of their members are too blinded by hate and prejudice to see that.

MyOwnPeace

(16,926 posts)
89. Well, look at it this way........
Mon Aug 8, 2016, 07:08 PM
Aug 2016

one has already done damage - the other has the potential to do so.

Let's not get blinded by the timing - get rid of them both!

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
28. That would be nice if Obama wanted it.
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 10:29 AM
Aug 2016
As it happens, Obama himself has weighed in on the possibility before, making clear he's not that interested in the job. Here's what he told the New Yorker in 2014:

“When I got out of law school, I chose not to clerk,” he said. “Partly because I was an older student, but partly because I don’t think I have the temperament to sit in a chamber and write opinions.” But he sounded tempted by the idea.

“I love the law, intellectually,” Obama went on. “I love nutting out these problems, wrestling with these arguments. I love teaching. I miss the classroom and engaging with students. But I think being a Justice is a little bit too monastic for me. Particularly after having spent six years and what will be eight years in this bubble, I think I need to get outside a little bit more.”

There's a precedent of a president becoming a Supreme Court justice after his term in the White House. William Howard Taft, who served as president from 1909 to 1913, joined the Supreme Court eight years later, nominated by Warren Harding, and served from 1921 to 1930.

WaPo

PatSeg

(47,429 posts)
38. Even better
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 12:08 PM
Aug 2016

What if she appointed Michelle Obama to the Supreme Court???

I am quite sure neither Michelle or Barack would want it, but it is fun to fantasize about it.

book_worm

(15,951 posts)
12. He might yet if HRC wins--they might take Garland thinking that HRC might
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 09:34 AM
Aug 2016

appoint somebody more liberal.

 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
17. That begs a question...
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 09:39 AM
Aug 2016

If the Senate doesn't move on the Garland nom before January, can President Clinton nominate someone else, or does Garland get to stay nominated?

unblock

(52,220 posts)
27. The nomination expires Jan. 20, but
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 10:26 AM
Aug 2016

Assuming Hillary wins, and especially if we also win the senate, I can't imagine republicans thinking they'd ever get a better deal than garland.

So I think he's easily headed for confirmation in December.

Volaris

(10,270 posts)
50. The Senate dems should be dicks and filibuster...
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 03:02 PM
Aug 2016

We waited this long, sooooooo....

Yeah we're gonna wait another few weeks and see what Madame President wants us to do.

=)

unblock

(52,220 posts)
61. They should, but
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 04:41 PM
Aug 2016

Realistically, it would be really horrible politics for Obama to pull him nomination or for senate dems to filibuster it.

Th partisan in me wishes they would, but future potential nominees might not trust us in the process.

Volaris

(10,270 posts)
63. Right cause optics are what we care about
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 06:09 PM
Aug 2016

What was that quote?
Something about democrats insisting on using the correct fork, when we sit down to dinner with barbarian vandals?

Anyone that I would want nominated would appreciate the willingness to use the other sides tactics against them...

But yeah, yours is likely the better approach.

unblock

(52,220 posts)
65. it's not about the optics, i'm with you on that; it's about governance.
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 06:37 PM
Aug 2016

thing is, when you nominate someone, they have to be willing to go through a process that can be easy and dignified, or it can be demeaning and political. true, many people would jump at the chance whatever the process, but in fact there are people who say no, simply because they don't want to be used as political pawns in front of the nation.

it's important for that reason for a president to stand by the nominee, defend the nominee from smear attempted, and not be seen as willing to drop the nominee for arbitrary reasons or a minor pushback from the other side.

dropping merrick after the election because hillary won and we can get someone more liberal in is rather like ending a perfectly happy marriage just because you have the opportunity to then marry someone you consider better.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
22. That's it
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 10:06 AM
Aug 2016

In McConnell's mind, what a majority of voting Kentuckians marked on their ballot for the U.S. Senate outweighs the will of the people as expressed in the general election.

Every time a Republican publicly invokes "the will of the people," he or she should get pasted with an overripe tomato.

bucolic_frolic

(43,158 posts)
71. Undermining the Constitution
Mon Aug 8, 2016, 08:45 AM
Aug 2016

This is just a warmup

McConnell has done permanent damage to governance, this is as bad
as repairing our good will around the world after GWB

MyOwnPeace

(16,926 posts)
90. Gawd,
Mon Aug 8, 2016, 07:15 PM
Aug 2016

and so many of these dimwads have no idea of what BHO has had to do in order to raise our standing in the world - just to see the world trembling thinking about - well, you know who!

sorefeet

(1,241 posts)
19. That oath they take
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 09:47 AM
Aug 2016

when being sworn into office to work for the American people means NOTHING to them. But they take a vow to obstruct everything to make the president fail and think that's law and they are doing their elected job. Traitor to the people at least.

imanamerican63

(13,787 posts)
23. Silmy right wing tactic since day one!
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 10:06 AM
Aug 2016

What goes around comes around! And they have to be proud they nominated Trump!

Botany

(70,504 posts)
24. Tell me of your love for the U.S. Constitution again Mitch.
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 10:19 AM
Aug 2016

<Article Two of the United States Constitution requires the President of the United States to
nominate Supreme Court Justices and, with Senate confirmation, requires Justices to be
appointed.>

raging moderate

(4,305 posts)
30. You are right. Mitch is violating the US Constitution.
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 10:38 AM
Aug 2016

As I recall, they swore to uphold the US Constitution when they took office as US Senators. There is no precedent for this violation. Why are we letting them get away with it?

Botany

(70,504 posts)
37. Because by in large the media is owned by the GOP.
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 12:03 PM
Aug 2016

"They" blocked a very qualified person for surgeon general for 18 months,
right now "they" are blocking funds to fight the zika virus, and "they" have
blocked any vote on gun control too. (But we did get 9 hearings on Benghazi
and Hillary's emails.)

Remember on Jan. 21, 2009 "they" got together and promised to block everything
that President Obama would try to do in the hopes that it would help crash the
economy so the people would suffer and take it out on the President.*

If we really had an honest media many of these repugs would be out of a job because they
are so un-American.

* http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/6/8/1098434/-Eric-Cantor-Paul-Ryan-Kevin-McCarthy-Plot-To-Sabotage-US-Economy-with-Frank-Luntz

tritsofme

(17,377 posts)
56. They are violating norms, not the Constitution itself.
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 03:36 PM
Aug 2016

The Senate is not constitutionally obligated to act on a president's nomination, but the norms dictate that they should hold hearings and confirm or reject the nominee.

Greybnk48

(10,168 posts)
33. He thinks he will be remembered.
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 11:26 AM
Aug 2016

Maybe vaguely for a short while, and not in a good way. And he's proud?

edhopper

(33,576 posts)
34. I will laugh so hard when Hillary puts
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 11:29 AM
Aug 2016

the first Black Lesbian on the Court (just thinking of people that would drive him nuts)

milestogo

(16,829 posts)
35. "one of my proudest moments" was when I told Obama "you're dealing with total assholes"
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 11:31 AM
Aug 2016

who think they're going to impress American voters by not doing their jobs.

Enoki33

(1,587 posts)
36. Is it any wonder 73% of Americans think
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 12:03 PM
Aug 2016

the country is on the wrong track? Hopefully they will the reasons why.

MyOwnPeace

(16,926 posts)
91. "Hopefully?"
Mon Aug 8, 2016, 07:20 PM
Aug 2016

Really?
This is a group of a$$holes that have nominated Drump to be our leader!
And you expect them to understand something so obvious?
I'll be kind:

They will not.

tritsofme

(17,377 posts)
40. And if we don't kick him out of the majority leader's office it will sit vacant another 2 years
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 12:35 PM
Aug 2016

At least. Not to mention that 2018 is a favorable map for Republicans, if we don't take the Senate now, we may not have a good opportunity for a few cycles.

At this point, getting the Senate is almost as important as getting the WH.

tblue37

(65,340 posts)
41. Second only to vowing on the evening of Obama's first inauguration to never
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 12:36 PM
Aug 2016

cooperate with him to improve Americans' lives, because he needed Americans to suffer enough to make Obama a one-term president.

Johonny

(20,849 posts)
42. I can't help but think of Clint Eastwood who can't understand why Obama isn't working with congress
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 12:43 PM
Aug 2016

Then you read stuff like this and remember the reason is the people Clint Eastwood and people like him elected to congress.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
43. Of Obama and McConnell, which one...
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 12:54 PM
Aug 2016

...just outed himself refusing to perform his duty under the Constitution?

enid602

(8,616 posts)
45. BHO
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 01:21 PM
Aug 2016

I wonder if McConnell will feel so 'proud' when his refusal to consider Judge Garland results in Barrack Hussein Obama being appointed to the Supreme Court.

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
86. Oh dude, you are not thinking clearly here
Mon Aug 8, 2016, 06:13 PM
Aug 2016

We want a jurist who meets two criteria: excellence in appellate work, and the ability to just piss the Republicans the fuck off. And for our money, no one is better at both than Stephen Reinhardt. This fucking guy is so far to the left he makes Bernie Sanders look like Barry Goldwater. Unfortunately he'd only be on the bench for a couple of years, but that's cool because by the time he, RBG, Kennedy and Alito are ready to be replaced, Hillary will have found four solid liberals to replace them with.

Vinca

(50,270 posts)
47. Assuming Hillary wins and we also take the Senate, Obama needs to immediately
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 01:57 PM
Aug 2016

withdraw the Garland nomination. Fuck Mitch the Turtle, Hillary should nominate more liberal people. The day after the election Mitch will be calling for a vote on Garland if Hillary and the Dems win.

 

47of74

(18,470 posts)
51. I'm kind of surprised Mitch McFuckstick managed to keep from adding the N word to that statement.
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 03:07 PM
Aug 2016

You know he and the other Republicans in Congress are dying to be able to call the President that out loud in public.

Takket

(21,565 posts)
54. With all due respect to garland....
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 03:28 PM
Aug 2016

I hope Obama pulls his nomination once it becomes clear Hillary has won in November. The GOP had the chance to discuss and approve or vote down Garland when they had the chance, but chose to stick to their plan of refusing to do ANY work associated with anything Obama proposes.

Hoping the Dems win the senate and Hillary should appoint her own judge every bit as liberal as Scalia was conservative. Serves them right for their stubborn obstructionist racist hatred of Obama.

DLevine

(1,788 posts)
57. Spot on! I couldn't agree with you more.
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 03:38 PM
Aug 2016

As you said, they had their chance. If Hillary wins, I'd like to see her nominate someone younger and, more importantly, liberal.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,340 posts)
64. I hope Garland ...
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 06:22 PM
Aug 2016

... has the grace to pull himself out of nomination before the election.

Before the Repubs realize what might happen, so rush to consent to what is probably a lesser evil (in their minds).

madamesilverspurs

(15,801 posts)
55. Bleccchh.
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 03:36 PM
Aug 2016

Nasty, vile, disgusting, un-American, anti-American, filthy piece of something that no self-respecting animal would excrete. He is in desperate need of replacing.

And my "senator" Cory Gardner is molding himself in McConnell's image. Oh goody.



,

IcyPeas

(21,870 posts)
58. they will all vote for Trump because they want the Supreme Court!!
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 04:01 PM
Aug 2016

at this point I can't see any other reason.

ailsagirl

(22,896 posts)
66. Just... unbelievable
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 07:05 PM
Aug 2016

MM isn't saying that he'd block the choice of a candidate he didn't feel was appropriate-- he's saying that because the President wants a particular candidate, that automatically disqualifies him/her. What a hateful piece of garbage.

Yep, ol' mitch is definitely looking out for our country.


 

MichiganVote

(21,086 posts)
70. This guy is fucked up. Not to McCain-you weren't hired to sit on Sunday am shows, you're
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 09:23 PM
Aug 2016

NOT the fucking president and you're NOT going to last much longer. This politician has out lived his political shelf life.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
72. This is why we have to give HRC a Democratic Senate... I have no doubt
Mon Aug 8, 2016, 08:49 AM
Aug 2016

that turtle man would/will try to hold up this nomination for another 4/ 8 years.

Calculating

(2,955 posts)
76. The republicans gotta go
Mon Aug 8, 2016, 11:10 AM
Aug 2016

Unless the senate and house are taken, we can expect another 4 years of gridlock. The party of NO is already gearing up for more obstruction.

Loki

(3,825 posts)
79. When pollsters ask the question "Is America going on the wrong track?"
Mon Aug 8, 2016, 11:52 AM
Aug 2016

This should be used as the perfect example of why we are fed up. The follow up question needs to be asked.

lark

(23,099 posts)
80. Guess he likes getting paid for doing nothing.
Mon Aug 8, 2016, 01:49 PM
Aug 2016

Actually it's worse than that, getting paid for fucking up the country and deliberately refusing to do his job. Repugs are nothing more or less than traitors, the degree varies but all of them are OK with fucking up our country to advance their own political views. Hope HRC appoints a barn burner liberal and Dems have a no filibuster for nominees rule. It would be the repugs just deserts. Only issue is Dems in congress tend to be spineless, so I'd be surprised if they actually followed through with the much needed No Filibuster rule.

MyOwnPeace

(16,926 posts)
93. On a "reality" show.....
Mon Aug 8, 2016, 07:29 PM
Aug 2016

some "Orange Dick-wad" would have shouted:

"YOU'RE FIRED!"

If only it were so..........

Initech

(100,070 posts)
83. Is it me or does Mitch remind you of the heckler from Happy Gilmore?
Mon Aug 8, 2016, 05:06 PM
Aug 2016

"You will not fill this seat, jackass!!!!"

forest444

(5,902 posts)
84. If I were Obama I'd look him right in the eye and say:
Mon Aug 8, 2016, 05:34 PM
Aug 2016

"Two words, Bitchy Mitchy: Ping May."

https://www.thenation.com/article/mitch-mcconnells-freighted-ties-shadowy-shipping-company/

Believe me, that double chin of his would start sweating like a ho' in church.

turbinetree

(24,695 posts)
85. Most human beings in the work place have to sign
Mon Aug 8, 2016, 06:07 PM
Aug 2016

paperwork for a Code of Conduct to stay employed for starters.

And this hypocrite some how gets a pass on that little framework.

Because the Constitution is basically a set of rules and the Code of Conduct.

But I digress, this hypocrite, was at a restaurant conspiring against a newly elected president and this hypocrite signed a letter to a foreign government to undermine the authority of the president for negotiations with another country -------



Honk----------------for a political revolution

turbinetree

(24,695 posts)
98. Whatever semantics we use he and Ryan and others should not be in power
Tue Aug 9, 2016, 07:06 AM
Aug 2016

they have no conduct of ethos and they have no honor to abide by the rules, I can think of about five words to describe him and Ryan, but I like the words "lack of scruples"




Honk---------------for a political revolution



Scalded Nun

(1,236 posts)
96. That's all these fuckers know how to do
Mon Aug 8, 2016, 10:30 PM
Aug 2016

Get in the way, not unlike the schoolyard bully. Wants your lunch money and anything else he fancies. Can't do anything, can't be productive. Just good at pushing others around, making sure they can't get anything done. Even builds a following of weak-minded little shits envious of his ability to instill fear.

Someone finally stands up and punches him in the eye and he runs off crying to mommy that the mean kids beat him up.

greymattermom

(5,754 posts)
99. So if they are the party of no, why not give them what they ask for?
Tue Aug 9, 2016, 07:34 AM
Aug 2016

No federal funding for their state.
No extra for disaster recovery, after the people are rescued.
No funding for disease outbreaks.
When they say no,
treat them like the toddlers they are, and they will grow up very quickly.

helpisontheway

(5,007 posts)
100. Karma that a CLINTON will likely fill
Tue Aug 9, 2016, 09:14 AM
Aug 2016

the vacancy...And we know how much Republicans love the Clintons.

itcfish

(1,828 posts)
102. So He Must Be
Tue Aug 9, 2016, 09:38 AM
Aug 2016

Very confident that the Donald will win and the republicans will control congress. What does he know that we don't? Talk about a rigged election. Because if that is not the case, what does he think that Hillary is going to appoint anti-choice and anti-gay judges? That is a mighty gamble.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»McConnell: "one of my pro...