General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy I'm Ready for President Obama to Leave the White House
He must be the most disrespected President in American history.
snip//
When Obama was elected, many thought we were being ushered into a new eracertainly not a post-racial milieu, but, perhaps, a less overt one. The fact that a black man could rise so high was shocking. It made many think that things were getting better. It gave us hope. Now, that hope is gone.
It is clear that no matter how high you rise, no matter what office you hold, no matter how hard you work, if you are black, many will view and treat you like a second-class citizen. No, they wont use racial epithets. They will not burn a cross in your yard. They may not spit in your face. But the undeniable fact is that white supremacy is here to stay, and no election will cure that ill.
snip//
Im tired of seeing President Obama blatantly disrespected, and my soul is weary from having to see him grin and bear it. Im ready for President Obama to be free from the burden of having to perform for white supremacyand Im ready to be free from the burden of having to watch him do it.
Read More; http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/why-im-ready-for-president-obama-to-leave-the-white_us_57ae4b78e4b0e7935e04eb0e
Posted without comment.
Different Drummer
(7,651 posts)monmouth4
(9,711 posts)A HERETIC I AM
(24,380 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)disrespected. The hatred and racism was real. Period.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,380 posts)I have been paying attention for the last little bit, I assure you.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)A HERETIC I AM
(24,380 posts)Ok....let me be CRYSTAL FUCKING CLEAR.....
I'm 57 years old.
I've been paying attention for the VAST majority of those years.
Alright?
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)downplaying it.
FOR FUCKS SAKE!!!
A HERETIC I AM
(24,380 posts)Last edited Thu Feb 15, 2024, 11:51 AM - Edit history (1)
Do you practice being this difficult? Or is it something that comes naturally?
Let me put it another way then, since apparently nuance COMPLETELY escapes you.
I KNOW MR.OBAMA HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF RACISM, BIGOTRY AND RUDENESS HIS ENTIRE PRESIDENCY!!
OK?
Jesus H. Christ drinking a cold one on the Eisenhower Balcony and drooling it all down his front.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)At the same time, you are incredibly rude, but that's to be expected.
TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)Nt
A HERETIC I AM
(24,380 posts)I'm rude?
Fine. Let's recap;
I responded to Post #2 with the sentiment that almost anyone who has held the office of President for 8 years is ready to leave, an agreement with the OP and an expansion on the point made by the poster Monmouth4
Then YOU responded by suggesting that by saying what I said, I was somehow diminishing what the president has gone through, which of course, I did no such fucking thing.
So I told you that I hadn't just fallen off the Yam Wagon, (or the Turnip truck, or just born yesterday or whatever, as they all mean basically the same thing, that I am not naive) and that I had been paying attention for "the last little bit" a sort of play on words meant to assure you that "the last little bit" included the last 7 and a half years. That went right over your head, but it wasn't by any means rude.
As this point was lost on you, you decided to school me by telling me that Mr. Obama "has been treated like shit his entire 7-year term!"
Yeah. I got that. You must think I have been asleep.
By now I am getting a wee frustrated, as you seem to not understand that I am not a child, nor have I been asleep, so I told you my age and that I have been aware of what's going on for most of that time.
Not good enough for you.
YOU FOLLOW THAT UP BY INSULTING MY INTELLIGENCE ONCE AGAIN, by saying (once again) that I was "diminishing" what the president has been put through, to wit;
In what universe can what I said be construed as "Downplaying" and "Diminishing"? If I had said something like "Oh, he had it no worse than Nixon", THAT would certainly qualify, but I didn't.
Since you clearly can't understand the words I typed, I thought making the point in a large, bright red font might help you.
The only reason I asked if you practice being difficult is because by that time I was frankly astounded you weren't getting the fact that I FUCKING AGREE WITH YOU!
Awww...thanks! If you expected me to be rude, why bother responding to me? Put me on ignore then. Science has yet to invent the device that can measure how little it will matter to me if you never respond to another post of mine.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Just walk away.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)...and they're one who is "petty" and "rude"?
A HERETIC I AM
(24,380 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)rude. It's the truth!!
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Anywhere.
Do you not know how a fucking Venn diagram works?
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)they act as if THEY are a victim. Much like what you're doing here. Resorting to personal attacks.
You will never shut me up.
Racism is here. It is the reality. And because I called it out and you don't like it, that's on you. You'll have to deal with that. And so does everyone else here who continues to downplay, deny, or somehow put forward the stupid-ass argument that class is more salient than race.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,380 posts)If this statement;
Is in ANY WAY directed at me, then you are out of line. There is no way the statement I typed which began this little exchange could be construed as trying to "explain away racism" and I am not acting like I am somehow a victim.
Kindly get off your high horse and understand that no one is belittling or diminishing or downplaying what Mr. Obama has gone through and YOU DON'T HOLD THE MORAL HIGH GROUND on this issue just because you think you do.
The above is proof that you are stepping out of bounds. No one has said anything of the sort.
You have insulted the intelligence of myself and others a number of times on this sub-thread, and it's time you got over yourself.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)...is it not implied the job is therefore much more difficult for those of non-privileged groups?
Because that's how I read the post.
EvolveOrConvolve
(6,452 posts)Jesus, I'd think you were being deliberately obtuse, but sadly I've seen too many people on the interwebs with "blinders syndrome" - someone who is so focused on their own outrage that they can't see that their imagined opponent actually agrees with them.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)That's the problem and will continue to be the problem as long as you don't take those blinders off.
Better yet...as long as people continue to *PRETEND* to have cognitive dissonance because they refuse to accept reality.
EvolveOrConvolve
(6,452 posts)I laughed so hard when I saw your post that I almost choked on my mint. (it was a white mint, though, so I'm definitely a racist)
Hav
(5,969 posts)but "when they go low, we go high".
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Fortunately Obama is not nearly as weak.
Best president of my lifetime hands down and He is no shrinking flower in need of protection.
Squinch
(51,025 posts)acknowledging that fact is not a sign of weakness.
No one is saying he needs protection.
If you know sheshe2's posts, you will know that she is one of Obama's most loyal supporters.
And calling her weak is ridiculous.
madokie
(51,076 posts)and he's the best damn President we've had in my lifetime. Damn good man doing an almost impossible job and doing one hell of a good job of it
My proudest three vote ever
MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)I don't think the poster was implying the BO needed anyone's protection. I expect he fully expected exactly what he got. But like most people who overstay their welcome at a party, all of us would have liked BO to stay and the bigots to leave.
I cannot take credit for the shame that this country has endured at the hands of half wit republican legislators and other government officials who have traded in patriotism for bigotry.
They should be ashamed and they know who they are and what they have done. They have not diminished President Obama but they did diminish the office of the presidency. They have diminished the constitutional ideals of the United States as surely as the men and women who once hung black men b/c they were hateful human beings.
Its too bad that in this country of so many gifts, our tax money is assumed to pay for the misplaced bigoted ideals of the few in place of the beauty and strength of the many.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I saw no reference to a need for protection... though no doubt, you certainly inferred as much, regardless of any irrelevant flowers in your particular garden.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)is probably not the person who posted it without comment.
Not trying to be mean or petty here. Just thought I'd mention it, as I've sometimes posted an article and then had people replying to as if I wrote it or something.
Hope you enjoy a good day.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Meant it to be directed at the article and especially it's tone.
Clearly I failed at that as the comments attest. However looking down thread I do see I am not the only one who thinks that article is nonsense.
sheshe2
(83,937 posts)However looking down thread I do see I am not the only one who thinks that article is nonsense.
BTW thanks for misreading the OP and your apology.
And...
Meant it to be directed at the article and especially it's tone.
Clearly I failed at that as the comments attest.
You read. You Trashed. You were corrected. You said ooopsie, clearly I failed yet not big enough to apologize to me.
Got it.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)sheshe2
(83,937 posts)You posted me a gif.
Never answered a word I said.
Night
MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)Squinch
(51,025 posts)MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I don't admire it. I suspect President Obama wouldn't admire it either. He knows he was elected by significant majorities and has become greatly admired by even more. That confident "Well, how do you like me now?" to the GOP didn't come from a resentful victim mentality. Lol!
As for being relieved of the burden, he's not just accomplished a lot but learned a lot about how to be president. I bet he'd take on another term, especially with a Democrat-controlled Senate, with resolute enthusiasm. Just bet his biggest complaint would be that he couldn't have known this a couple years ago so he could have worked it into his plans.
LeftRant
(524 posts)First off, every president gets disrespected. Second, he's been a GREAT president! Finally, the haters are going to die off in coming decades, and their children will be slightly less inclined to hate black people because this fine man helped normalize what seemed unthinkable before his presidency. After 230 years of racism, America needed this, painful as its been. He needs to go only because his 8 are up, not because people hated him.
Squinch
(51,025 posts)Buckeye_Democrat
(14,858 posts)America needed this, painful as its been.
Agree.
jzola
(158 posts)Has an approval rating of about 56%. People love him. If he could run again he'd have a third term. I know I'd happily vote for him. These ugly people won't go away with any democratic president. That's who they are. Ugly people! Lucky for us we elected a man strong enough to take there crap and still come out ahead.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Initech
(100,107 posts)The GOP has been running a 25 year smear campaign against her, and they still won't shut the fuck up about Benghazi. So unless we vote every last one of them out of office, expect things to get worse.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Initech
(100,107 posts)Lancero
(3,015 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Somehow I think the racism is much more palatable here.
Squinch
(51,025 posts)American has more of a problem handing power to women than it does with handing power to black men. We gave the vote to black men before women. We had a black male president before a woman president. The glass ceiling for black men seems to be a little lower. Not much, but a little.
It'll be a little worse for her.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)So I don't think it was meant as an endorsement or criticism of what the article says.
Hope you enjoy a great day.
tman
(983 posts)He's been a ground breaker on many levels, has handled the job with grace, strength and dignity. The lower his opponents go, the bigger the man he seems.
A successful two term president who will leave a strong legacy.
If he could, I think he would've ran for a third and final term.
Oh shut up.
President Obama is a popular president. He was reelected in a landslide and is one of the three presidents to have an approval rating above 50% at this point in his term.
Obama is a strong man and can handle it and LOVES being president. This defeatist cowardice is so irritating.
csziggy
(34,138 posts)sheshe2 was just posting a portion of an opinion piece that was linked in her OP.
The only thing that sheshe2 added was " Posted without comment." Everything else, the subject line, the sentence above the photo, the photo, and especially the words in the grey box were from the article at the link in the message.
If you have a criticism send them to Lawrence Ware at Huffington Post - he's the one who wrote the article.
Bongo Prophet
(2,651 posts)Sheshe2 is as solid an Obama supporter as you can find here, and I've seen her for a few years now.
Besides, she posted without comment, and rather than cowardice, tends toward giving the Obamas a break from all the shit. They served and served well, and have expressed interest in living outside the confines of the White House. I think they deserve it.
We are trying to get over the acrimony of the primary wars, and need to be nicer with each other as we go forward. I welcome you, and hope you can be a part of that.
Peace
narnian60
(3,510 posts)csziggy
(34,138 posts)Not until I am sure there is a worthy successor to take his place. If the country goes crazier than I think it is and votes in Donald Trump I would hope that the sane people in places of power stage a coup to keep President Obama in office!
I do have to agree with Lawrence Ware, the writer of this piece linked in the OP, when he says:
The ignorant, hateful, despicable people who have spent the last eight years calling President Obama names, denigrating his qualifications, and disrespecting the office he holds haven't had enough time to learn the error of their ways. The party that has encouraged them is now reaping the results of what they have created and I hope it is destroyed by it's monster.
I hope the time between Election Day and Inauguration Day is enough time for the disintegration of the Grand Old Party and every stage of grief its supporters need to achieve resignation and sanity.
And I hope President Obama and his family have a lovely day welcoming Madame President Hillary Rodham Clinton and former President William Jefferson Clinton into the White House on January 20, 2017!
KMOD
(7,906 posts)I suspect that once the restraints of the office are behind him, he will emerge as an even stronger and more powerful leader than he is today. And he's only 55! He will be a powerful voice for decades.
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Barack Obama has more courage and intestinal fortitude in his little finger than the person who wrote the article has in their whole body.
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)and when the column below appeared in the National Review in 2001, there was no controversy. No calls for the author to get fired, no demanding the GOP denounce it, just a couple of columns in liberal publications pointing it out:
http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/stories/2001/update022301.html
"I hate Chelsea Clintion," John Derbyshire declares in his Feb. 15 column. He admits at first that he doesn't have a clear reason for doing so, but one certainly emerges: She's a Clinton -- more specifically, "the vile genetic inheritance of Bill and Hillary Clinton."
And the only genuine solution for dealing with this situation, Derbyshire writes, is death:
"Chelsea is a Clinton. She bears the taint; and though not prosecutable in law, in custom and nature the taint cannot be ignored. All the great despotisms of the past I'm not arguing for despotism as a principle, but they sure knew how to deal with potential trouble recognized that the families of objectionable citizens were a continuing threat. In Stalin's penal code it was a crime to be the wife or child of an "enemy of the people". The Nazis used the same principle, which they called Sippenhaft, "clan liability". In Imperial China, enemies of the state were punished "to the ninth degree": that is, everyone in the offender's own generation would be killed, and everyone related via four generations up, to the great-great-grandparents, and four generations down, to the great-great-grandchildren, would also be killed."
melman
(7,681 posts)it's not even debatable.
And Kennedy was fucking assassinated.
GoCubsGo
(32,095 posts)...Ken Starr sicced the FBI on Hillary over her days at the Rose Law Firm. I remember reading a number of articles that discussed how they were rifling through her underwear drawer looking for some non-existent papers related to Whitewater or some other such bullshit. Even President Obama, as disrespected as he has been, has been subjected to that kind of invasion of his privacy.
B2G
(9,766 posts)It's just not us doing it this time around.
reznor73
(17 posts)He's taken a hell of a beating. Not to mention we've seen white supremacy hate groups go on a gun buying spree. I can't imagine how horrifying that was for his kids to see news stories about all the guns being bought because people think their Dad is a "secret muslim terrorist".
He's not going away though. That's a GOP thing.
Republican presidents always "go away". Bush 1, Bush 2, Reagan, Ford & Nixon - they all went away to retirement, book writing or to quietly expand their business interests.
Democrats are cut from a different cloth - just look at Carter, Gore (ok, he was a VP but still) and Clinton.
You can certainly make the case that Clinton & Gore were just seeking financial gain and I'm not going to 100% disagree with you but I suspect President Obama will use his standing to champion social causes.
While I'm not African American - I hope he uses his unique standing to help bring to attention the destruction that is on going in the inner cities and to decriminalize these incredibly racist drug laws we have on the books.
Obama can take the hits. I'm excited to see what's next for him.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)of "the incredibly racist drug laws we have on the books?" Thanks.
bonemachine
(757 posts)to the next 4 (or 8) years of replacing that venomous racism with pernicious sexism?
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)President Obama's approval ratings are very high now and I bet it won't surprise either of us if they stay very high in the future. Remarkable presidency and I'm glad we've witnessed it and helped have his back as he'd had ours.
I can also understand the feelings of the author of that article. I'm looking forward to the next phase of President Obama's life, and that of his wonderful family.
And as you and I both know, we will continue having Hillary Clinton's back as she proceeds into another phase of her life and accomplishments for the people. We don't fall prey to the hysterical criticisms that far too many inflict on liberal groundbreakers.
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)I'm not saying they aren't racist, but they're equal opportunity haters.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)I think people of color knew already. But the blatant display of racism that we have seen has been jolting to me.
It's reasonable that someone might think it's possible that some racial anxiety and resentment may subside when he leaves office. Maybe it will. But, it should not be forgotten. What has been revealed may go back into hiding, but it is not going away unless white people do a lot more to oppose it.