Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
Tue Aug 16, 2016, 01:22 PM Aug 2016

If the Dems take the presidency and the Republicans take the house, how much does the Senate matter?


How much difference would there be between a Democratic president, a Republican house, and a narrowly-Democratic senate, and a Democratic president, a Republican house, and a narrowly-Republican Senate?
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If the Dems take the presidency and the Republicans take the house, how much does the Senate matter? (Original Post) Donald Ian Rankin Aug 2016 OP
The Senate confirms Supreme Court justices. charlyvi Aug 2016 #1
Is the key point there 50/50 or 60/40? Donald Ian Rankin Aug 2016 #3
With a Senate majority charlyvi Aug 2016 #8
And other federal judges gratuitous Aug 2016 #4
Yes, and justices at that level are the first defense for voting and other rights. HereSince1628 Aug 2016 #12
You betcha!!!!! Even at 50/50 the VP is the tie breaker, so Dem is must be. tonyt53 Aug 2016 #5
Dems would head all committees, no more endless Senate "inquiries" bigbrother05 Aug 2016 #9
not much legislatively, but quite a lot for appointments unblock Aug 2016 #2
A lot. More than even the house at this juncture. MichiganVote Aug 2016 #6
Judges, judges, judges.... Wounded Bear Aug 2016 #7
The Senate confirms judges leftynyc Aug 2016 #10
Two Words: gopiscrap Aug 2016 #11

charlyvi

(6,537 posts)
1. The Senate confirms Supreme Court justices.
Tue Aug 16, 2016, 01:24 PM
Aug 2016

That is BIGLY important.

On edit: Also confirms cabinet positions and federal court vacancies throughout the nation.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
3. Is the key point there 50/50 or 60/40?
Tue Aug 16, 2016, 01:25 PM
Aug 2016

I'm not quite sure of how the filibuster rules work, but can you get anything through, or stop anything, with 59 senators that you can't with 41?

Remember that if and when she takes office Clinton will be a lame duck president with only 4 more years of her term to run before the next election...

charlyvi

(6,537 posts)
8. With a Senate majority
Tue Aug 16, 2016, 01:45 PM
Aug 2016

there is much more likelihood of the SC nominees being confirmed, even if we don't have over 60. Why? The nuclear option. Reid and the Dem Senate changed the rules for confirming judicial appointees, except the SC, to a simple majority vote. What's to stop them from doing the same for SC nominees if the Repubs constantly obstruct or refuse to confirm? The leverage will be there if we hold the Senate.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_judicial_appointment_controversies

As a response to the continuing blocking of several of President Obama's nominees, Sen. Harry Reid on November 21, 2013 invoked the so-called Nuclear option and changed the Senate rules, meaning a simple majority vote will suffice for all nominees except for the Supreme Court.



Also, there are all the lower tier judicial vacancies that would be appointed by Democrat and confirmed with a simple Democratic majority.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
4. And other federal judges
Tue Aug 16, 2016, 01:25 PM
Aug 2016

At the district and circuit levels. Sixteen years of Democratic presidents appointing federal judges throughout the system can go a long way toward undoing some of the damage inflicted on our beloved United States by Republican misgovernance.

Wounded Bear

(58,670 posts)
7. Judges, judges, judges....
Tue Aug 16, 2016, 01:42 PM
Aug 2016

the Repubs have been trying to pack the courts with ultra-conservative judges for years, and have been preventing appointments all over the Fed government.

First order of business, eliminate the filibuster for ALL appointments and require hearings and up or down vote within a time limit. That's simple Senate rules, which has nothing to do with the Constitution. Rules are voted on at the beginning of the session and require simple majority vote.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If the Dems take the pres...