General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf the Dems take the presidency and the Republicans take the house, how much does the Senate matter?
How much difference would there be between a Democratic president, a Republican house, and a narrowly-Democratic senate, and a Democratic president, a Republican house, and a narrowly-Republican Senate?
charlyvi
(6,537 posts)That is BIGLY important.
On edit: Also confirms cabinet positions and federal court vacancies throughout the nation.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)I'm not quite sure of how the filibuster rules work, but can you get anything through, or stop anything, with 59 senators that you can't with 41?
Remember that if and when she takes office Clinton will be a lame duck president with only 4 more years of her term to run before the next election...
charlyvi
(6,537 posts)there is much more likelihood of the SC nominees being confirmed, even if we don't have over 60. Why? The nuclear option. Reid and the Dem Senate changed the rules for confirming judicial appointees, except the SC, to a simple majority vote. What's to stop them from doing the same for SC nominees if the Repubs constantly obstruct or refuse to confirm? The leverage will be there if we hold the Senate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_judicial_appointment_controversies
As a response to the continuing blocking of several of President Obama's nominees, Sen. Harry Reid on November 21, 2013 invoked the so-called Nuclear option and changed the Senate rules, meaning a simple majority vote will suffice for all nominees except for the Supreme Court.
Also, there are all the lower tier judicial vacancies that would be appointed by Democrat and confirmed with a simple Democratic majority.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)At the district and circuit levels. Sixteen years of Democratic presidents appointing federal judges throughout the system can go a long way toward undoing some of the damage inflicted on our beloved United States by Republican misgovernance.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)tonyt53
(5,737 posts)bigbrother05
(5,995 posts)unblock
(52,255 posts)MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,670 posts)the Repubs have been trying to pack the courts with ultra-conservative judges for years, and have been preventing appointments all over the Fed government.
First order of business, eliminate the filibuster for ALL appointments and require hearings and up or down vote within a time limit. That's simple Senate rules, which has nothing to do with the Constitution. Rules are voted on at the beginning of the session and require simple majority vote.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Supreme court and the federal bench. Way more important than the house.
gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)SUPREME COURT