Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWalmart is too cheap to pay for proper security — so now it’s freeloading off taxpayers
Walmart is too cheap to pay for proper security so now its freeloading off taxpayersBrad Reed BRAD REED 17 AUG 2016 AT 11:55 ET
Bloomberg Businessweek has a very detailed new report that shows how police departments around the country are getting fed up with Walmarts unwillingness to invest in proper store security infrastructure. In fact, it seems that Walmarts security is so notoriously lax that its stores have become magnets for criminals who know it will be easier to commit crimes in them.
Just how bad is Walmarts in-house security? In the city of Tulsa, police were responded to incidents at the citys four Walmart stores a total of just under 2,000 times. The citys lone Target store, meanwhile, called on police to respond to incidents just 44 times.
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/walmart-is-too-cheap-to-pay-for-proper-security-so-now-its-freeloading-off-taxpayers/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 884 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Walmart is too cheap to pay for proper security — so now it’s freeloading off taxpayers (Original Post)
workinclasszero
Aug 2016
OP
And their apologists don't care---they show up and gloat about profits gained
Kingofalldems
Aug 2016
#5
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)1. The costs of being robbed are lower than the costs of providing security.
It's that simple.
Let's say security costs, wages and all, $5000 per month.
What does it cost the store when people steal stuff? $1000 per month?
mwooldri
(10,303 posts)2. Time for PDs to bill MallWart.
For wasting police time.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)3. And coincidentally the only company to make money this quarter
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)6. No wonder huh?
Greybnk48
(10,168 posts)4. They've been called out for this for about 15 years.
In the Walmart documentary, "The High Cost of Low Prices," 2005, they are shown to only have surveillance for shoplifting. At the stores that were visited, none of the outside safety cameras were operational. They were props.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)7. Wow!
You would think someone would sue the hell out of them for that alone.
Kingofalldems
(38,457 posts)5. And their apologists don't care---they show up and gloat about profits gained
at the expense of taxpayers.
romanic
(2,841 posts)8. Unsurprising
Walmart cuts corners whenever and wherever.