Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pbmus

(12,422 posts)
Sun Aug 21, 2016, 02:27 AM Aug 2016

The death of neoliberalism and the crisis in western politics

Last edited Mon Aug 22, 2016, 12:33 AM - Edit history (1)

+The western financial crisis of 2007-8 was the worst since 1931, yet its immediate repercussions were surprisingly modest. The crisis challenged the foundation stones of the long-dominant neoliberal ideology but it seemed to emerge largely unscathed. The banks were bailed out; hardly any bankers on either side of the Atlantic were prosecuted for their crimes; and the price of their behaviour was duly paid by the taxpayer. Subsequent economic policy, especially in the Anglo-Saxon world, has relied overwhelmingly on monetary policy, especially quantitative easing. It has failed. The western economy has stagnated and is now approaching its lost decade, with no end in sight.

After almost nine years, we are finally beginning to reap the political whirlwind of the financial crisis. But how did neoliberalism manage to survive virtually unscathed for so long? Although it failed the test of the real world, bequeathing the worst economic disaster for seven decades, politically and intellectually it remained the only show in town. Parties of the right, centre and left had all bought into its philosophy, New Labour a classic in point. They knew no other way of thinking or doing: it had become the common sense. It was, as Antonio Gramsci put it, hegemonic. But that hegemony cannot and will not survive the test of the real world.

The first inkling of the wider political consequences was evident in the turn in public opinion against the banks, bankers and business leaders. For decades, they could do no wrong: they were feted as the role models of our age, the default troubleshooters of choice in education, health and seemingly everything else. Now, though, their star was in steep descent, along with that of the political class. The effect of the financial crisis was to undermine faith and trust in the competence of the governing elites. It marked the beginnings of a wider political crisis.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/aug/21/death-of-neoliberalism-crisis-in-western-politics?CMP=oth_b-aplnews_d-1


-–-----------------------------------------------------------------
Title should be "Dying Neoliberalism and Western Politics".



12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

nikto

(3,284 posts)
1. Death? If only
Sun Aug 21, 2016, 04:15 AM
Aug 2016

Neoliberalism has made a bad case for itself, for sure.

Most folks who have learned about it think it sucks (unless they are wealthy).

Unfortunately, it is not as dead as it could, or should, be.

It has led us to disaster after disaster ----Privatized prisons & privatized "Public" charter schools; a shrinking tax base,
as the rich pay less and less; widespread fracking; lopsided trade deals like NAFTA and now the horrible TPP;
massive loss of jobs (especially manufacturing) stateside; a monopolized and degraded corporate media; expensive healthcare managed by private compoanies for profit; politics dominated by "pay to play" ethics;
giant hedge funds siphoning wealth from the US, and other nations' economies;
an avalanche of debt (with the primary crediters being largely private banks);austerity imposed on millions
of already suffering people.

No.
Neoliberalism, sadly, is not dead yet.

But we can all dream of, and try to work for, its destruction, can't we?

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
4. The great rejection of Trump on Nov 8 will likely be seen as a landslide mandate for Neoliberals
Sun Aug 21, 2016, 06:18 AM
Aug 2016

A breath of new life for them.

 

nikto

(3,284 posts)
12. I sense that too, which sucks, so........ WE MUST FIGHT THAT PERCEPTION!
Mon Aug 22, 2016, 03:03 AM
Aug 2016

We can do it partly by going to war against TPP immediately after the election,
in mass-numbers.

I am prepared to do that, bigtime.



Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
3. I only wish it had gone away,
Sun Aug 21, 2016, 04:41 AM
Aug 2016

it may have morphed a bit, but I see it to be very much the current operating system.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
5. Dying perhaps but hardly dead. The author envisions China replacing the West as the global leader.
Sun Aug 21, 2016, 07:38 AM
Aug 2016
When China Rules the World

Synopsis

For over two hundred years we have lived in a western-made world, one where the very notion of being modern was synonymous with being western. The book argues that the twenty-first century will be different: with the rise of increasingly powerful non-Western countries, the west will no longer be dominant and there will be many ways of being modern. In this new era of ‘contested modernity’ the central player will be China.

Martin Jacques argues that far from becoming a western-style society, China will remain highly distinctive. It is already having a far-reaching and much-discussed economic impact, but its political and cultural influence, which has hitherto been greatly neglected, will be at least as significant. Continental in size and mentality, and accounting for one fifth of humanity, China is not even a conventional nation-state but a ‘civilization-state’ whose imperatives, priorities and values are quite different. As it rapidly reassumes its traditional place at the centre of East Asia, the old tributary system will resurface in a modern form, contemporary ideas of racial hierarchy will be redrawn and China’s ages-old sense of superiority will reassert itself. China’s rise signals the end of the global dominance of the west and the emergence of a world which it will come to shape in a host of different ways and which will become increasingly disconcerting and unfamiliar to those who live in the west.

Key arguments

1 - There is not simply one western modernity, instead we are witnessing the birth of multiple modernities
2 - Chinese modernity will be very different from western modernity
3 - We are moving into a world of contested modernity
4 - China will become the largest economy in the world within less than two decades and then proceed to rapidly out-distance that of the United States
5 - China’s impact on the world will not simply be economic; it will also have profound political, cultural and ideological effects
6 - For thousands of years, China was at the centre of the tributary-state system in East Asia, which only came to an end with the arrival of European colonialism at the end of the nineteenth century
7 - As the East Asian economy is rapidly reconfigured around China, we should expect elements of the tributary system to reappear
8 - At its core, China is a civilization-state rather than a nation-state, a fact which will become steadily more apparent
9 - The Chinese state is very different from the western state: it has existed for over two thousand years, for over a millennium it has had no competitors (e.g., church, merchants) nor limits to its power; it is regarded with reverence and deference by the Chinese as the guardian and protector of Chinese civilization
10 - The Chinese have a deep and living sense of their own culture and civilization which they regard as superior to all others
11 - 92% of the Chinese believe that they are of one race, the Han Chinese, unlike the other most populous nations such as India, the United States, Brazil and Indonesia, which recognize themselves to be highly multi-racial and multi-cultural

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_China_Rules_the_World

colsohlibgal

(5,275 posts)
7. I Wonder Where We Are Headed
Sun Aug 21, 2016, 08:56 AM
Aug 2016

That no big Wall Street exec went to jail for fraud still stuns me. That they instead got to take our bailout and leave with 500 million dollar golden parachutes is ridiculous.

Everyday people get prosecuted for fraud, not handed 100s of millions.

I wonder and worry about where we are headed.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The death of neoliberalis...