...he is a bigoted coward who has severe health issues and a bipolar personality.

Or so I've heard...

That's what some people say, anyhow.

but he sure projects well

I expect to vote against the SOB in Novemver.

GOTV

Scawy woman gonna huff and puff and blow your house down.

He's a racist, misogynistic, pompous, disgusting, scared little boy.

can you imagine if somebody said that she was hiding in her apartment?

that would be another WEEK of stories on her unhealthiness.

the way the media have turned on a dime the last two weeks would be stunning, if one was unaware of the way this happened during the swiftboating of kerry

Hillary has handled it for DECADES

Facing the collapse of his brand.
Facing the collapse of his ego prop: "I'm a winner".

[font size="+1"]He's a snowflake.[/font]

Do it now!

and let the media do what it's doing now (going full Fools for Scandal mode on Hillary, which is their default position), he might actually win

he's so clearly his own worst enemy (his only one, actually, since the media lightly taps on only his most egregious faults, while IGNORING everything else)

contrast the constant feeding frenzy on the foundation with the COMPLETE ignoring of the new book on Trump, featuring TWENTY HOURs of interviews with the orange dunce

OK, I saw them twice yesterday, for a couple of minutes, with zero followup discussion, and NO times today, since about 4PM.

what happened to THEM?

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/washington-post-trump-book-best-parts-227259

is a fear of going out in public

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agoraphobia

Talking to all the portraits and busts of former Presidents and sobbing uncontrollably.

No wait... That was Richard Nixon. Who was by comparison the very model of mental health.

But ya can't hide.

and an interview of a rival Republican candidate is troubling....it moots your argument entirely.

Most DUers seem capable of such distinguishing.....I am heartened by that.

You refer to the paper as "a purported scientific study" with the clear insinuation that the authors made false representations about their work. Your insinuation is itself what's false. As I noted in my post, the responses on DU resolutely avoided the substance and instead launched ad hominem attacks on the authors based on how other people (headline writers and social media commenters, apparently) had characterized their work.

If you go to the Snopes "debunking" that was so lauded by Clinton supporters here, you'll find it begins with the following summary:

Edit- afraid of the clowns, not the pron.

He was debating 15 other clowns during the primary. Now he'll be debating someone with years of political & foreign experience, who is incredibly articulate & can maintain her composure & act like an adult.

back home to sleep, she is fragile, now she is a bigot, guess what, Trump is describing himself. He wants to put the word out on his opponent before it is shown this are his traits.