General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEdward Snowden is the perfect candidate for a presidential pardon
snip> Edward Snowden is the former National Security Agency contractor who risked his job, his prestige and his freedom to expose the NSAs secret mass surveillance programs that trampled the privacy rights of Americans. For that, he has earned the gratitude of millions of Americans and the loathing of the security state. The Justice Department indicted him under the Espionage Act for revealing classified information. The State Department stripped him of his passport while he was in a Russian airport transit lounge, effectively exiling him to Russia. Now human rights organizations at home and abroad are joining to call on President Obama to pardon Snowden.
Even those who oppose a pardon acknowledge that, as Obamas former attorney general Eric Holder said, if Snowdens leak of classified information was inappropriate and illegal, the whistleblower had performed a public service.<
>"He didnt flee to Russia; he was trapped there when the government stripped his passport. He didnt have protected whistleblower avenues. He didnt lie about his medical discharge from the military or his position as a NSA contractor. The House report accuses Snowden of causing tremendous damage to national security, but fails to offer a clue of what that damage might be.<
more:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/edward-snowden-is-the-perfect-candidate-for-a-presidential-pardon/2016/09/20/09c0bf80-7e9e-11e6-8d0c-fb6c00c90481_story.html?utm_term=.4e6ed9180cfc
Me.
(35,454 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Just passing through...
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)His passport was revoked because he was caught lying and stealing. He's not an innocent.
cpwm17
(3,829 posts)activities could be exposed was for someone like Snowden to expose it as he did. There was no other avenue.
He was stuck in Russia because the US pulled his passport when he was there. That is history. Any other claim is dishonest.
Timothy Edgar, director of privacy and civil liberties in Obamas own national security staff, concluded: Snowden forced the NSA to become more transparent, more accountable, more protective of privacy and more effective. For this, Edgar says, the U.S. government has reason to say, Thank you, Mr. Snowden. ...
Even in exile, Snowden has continued to serve the greater good. Kenneth Roth, the executive director of Human Rights Watch, and Salil Shetty, secretary general of Amnesty International, making the case for pardoning Snowden, write that Snowden now is the head of a human rights group, the Freedom of the Press Foundation; hes developing technology to protect journalists in dangerous zones around the world from life-threatening surveillance; and he has frequently criticized the human rights and technology policies of Russia, the only country that stands between him and a high-security prison in the United States.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,239 posts)cpwm17
(3,829 posts)The US Constitution isn't by majority vote:
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,239 posts)Instead, he fled the country in order to make a big splash with his Chinese & Russian overlords.
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)He was a liar from day one, and shame on you for falling for it.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)In addition to exposing illegal activities, he also exposed A LOT of perfectly legal and legitimate foreign intelligence operations. Why did he do that?
FUCK EDWARD SNOWDEN. I'd be be willing to give him a pass on revealing the illegal stuff, but he has other crimes to answer for.
So boo-frickin'-hoo Eddie. Enjoy the Moscow winter.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,239 posts)asshole. Any leverage, he & Oliver Stone thought they would gain from that fiasco has completely blown up in their faces. Hollywood can't save Snowie, cuz nobody gives a shit about him or his new Russian masters. Whether there by choice, or completely by accident (cough..cough), he's Putin's problem now.
5 Reasons Why Snowden Couldnt Hack It at the Box Office
Tough subject matter and weak reviews hurt Oliver Stones film about NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden
Snowden opened to $8 million in theaters this weekend, a disappointing fourth-place start for the Joseph Gordon-Levitt drama about NSA whistle blower Edward Snowden that was produced for $40 million.
Tough subject matter, tough critics and numerous release date changes are just a few reasons why Snowden underperformed on 2,443 screens though the fact that it landed an A from theatergoers surveyed by CinemaScore suggests that it may have some holding power in coming weeks due to positive word of mouth.
Even director Oliver Stone told TheWrap that studios shied away from the film despite a great script and co-star Shailene Woodley.
2. Joseph Gordon-Levitt Isnt a Box Office Draw Anymore
The actor hasnt exactly packed em in for his recent movies. His film The Walk was produced on a budget of $35 million, but only grossed $10.1 million domestically after a $3.4 million debut weekend.
http://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/the-wrap/article/5-Reasons-Why-Snowden-Might-Not-Hack-It-at-9226205.php
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)He didnt have protected whistleblower avenues. -- But there were other courses of action he could have easily taken were he not motivated by personal enrichment and fame, and as I've already pointed out a thousand times, the vast majority of what has been published so far (Spying on China, relatives of AQ leadership, etc) are legitimate foreign intelligence/defense operations, and have nothing to do with "whistleblowing".
He didnt lie about his medical discharge from the military or his position as a NSA contractor. -- Cool, then where is his proof? I'd love to see it.
The House report accuses Snowden of causing tremendous damage to national security, but fails to offer a clue of what that damage might be. -- Because it is classified, but it is telling that the recommendations of the HPSCI were unanimous. Snowden needs to be thanking whatever god he prays to that it is classified for the time being, since the full 36-page report almost certainly confirms what I've been saying all along, which is that Snowden collaborated with Russian intelligence services.
=======================
=======================
Defectors to Russia tend to not get pardoned, nor are they ignorant enough to demand one... I'm old enough to remember when Snowden was clamoring for his day in court, and then later a plea bargain, but even the most ardent true believers on his legal defense team realize there's no way out. Since Snowden has no chance in hell of getting pardoned by whoever wins the election, an 11th hour Hail Mary from Obama (who Snowdenistas have been shitting on nonstop for 3+ years) is his only salvation...
If Snowflake is truly happy in Moscow as he has claimed, let him live out the rest of his days there while the rest of us move on...
NOW.... Is there anything else, or are we done here?
skylucy
(3,740 posts)rolled my eyes. Glad that people are not flocking to see it.
randome
(34,845 posts)...then this entire thread becomes meaningless. We wouldn't want that, would we?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
Response to OxQQme (Original post)
Post removed
Tarheel_Dem
(31,239 posts)with secret surveillance until the black guy showed up in the Oval Office. When Bush/Cheney were in the WH, Snowden thought "leakers should be shot in the balls". Remember that?
freebrew
(1,917 posts)the government would be way farther ahead with their spying on U.S. citizens.
He exposed illegal programs started in the * administration that Obama
refused to stop and in fact embraced.
If he had done this during the * era, no doubt he would be a hero here.
I don't care about him personally. That's a diversion.
What he did was as important as what Ellsberg did and has said as much.
BlueInPhilly
(870 posts)"spying" on U.S. Citizens, with more malicious intent.
Now, if you were going to be spied on anyway, which side would you choose?
trof
(54,256 posts)I agree Siegelman should have been pardoned first day.
struggle4progress
(118,332 posts)due to various agreements between nations
(2) The US passports of fugitives are revoked, under long-existing law and regulation: there is nothing unusual about the revocation og Snowden's passport in this regard -- and it would have been highly unusual if the passport had not been revoked
(3) The revocation of the passport actually occurred when Snowden was in China, and China chose not to notice that fact
(4) While Snowden was in China, the Chinese press reported he was revealing US intelligence targets in China -- which does not suggest he was motivated by concern for civil liberties in the US
(5) While Snowden was in China, press also reported he visited the Russian embassy there -- which also does not suggest he was motivated by concern for civil liberties in the US
MineralMan
(146,325 posts)Not a chance.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)You'd have a better chance bringing Aaron Swartz back from the dead.
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)...maybe more people would support him?
He claimed to be against domestic spying, then almost exclusively exposed foreign intelligence activity. (Like when he was in Hong Kong and released data about US activity there to ingratiate himself with the local populace as the authorities closed in on him.) He failed to use whistle-blower outlets that were available to him before fleeing the country. He deceived his coworkers to get their login information, abusing his position of trust and authority to access and steal thousands of documents he had no clearance to access.
Nearly everything that comes out of his mouth is a lie, and he is clearly in it for the notoriety. He's nothing but a bored libertarian who decided that the same activity that he supported under a Republican President was somehow evil under a Democratic President. He's a fraud, and it's good that American audiences didn't fall for dishonest propaganda trying to paint him as anything else.