Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 03:12 PM Sep 2016

Not sure, but looks to me the cop in red planted the gun

It's very shaky but at 1:25, as the wife is walking back toward the scene, you can see the cop in red looking down at the ground.

As the wife gets closer, you hear "Back up", precisely as the cop in red is looking down and he quickly moves his feet into a position from which his left foot will not move for the rest of the video.

Stop the video at 1:25. What is the cop in red looking down at?

Notice also that the officer is walking forward but at hearing the approach of the wife, stops his motion and backs up to the position where he will keep his left foot firmly planted. Why would he change his motion just because the wife was approaching?

I think the cop told the wife to back up because that was precisely the moment he was planting the gun and he feared that being seen or recorded.

If you look closely at the cop in red's left foot, it looks like there is something sticking out from behind it. And he doesn't move that left foot for the rest of the recording.



I think it is crucially important to find out what this cop in red was looking down at and doing precisely at 1:25 of the video.


30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not sure, but looks to me the cop in red planted the gun (Original Post) Shankapotomus Sep 2016 OP
Object is kind of visible at 1:17 exboyfil Sep 2016 #1
Yeah, at 1:23 you can still see it Shankapotomus Sep 2016 #2
Whatever the officer in red dropped, it bounced on the pavement like a hard object JCMach1 Sep 2016 #3
I'm not talking about the gloves Shankapotomus Sep 2016 #5
that's exactly what I am saying ... watch closely and the object moves like JCMach1 Sep 2016 #6
What time does that object bounce? Shankapotomus Sep 2016 #10
second object appx. 2:17 it is shaky so watch carefully JCMach1 Sep 2016 #20
What's the deal with the "pairs of gloves" being dropped? ALBliberal Sep 2016 #4
All first responders are trained sharp_stick Sep 2016 #7
Black nitrile gloves jberryhill Sep 2016 #14
Thanks. Interesting though that in most ALBliberal Sep 2016 #19
I'm not sure what you mean jberryhill Sep 2016 #22
Thanks I will clarify. This is the first time that I am aware of the dropping ALBliberal Sep 2016 #24
Did you watch the Walter Scott shooting video? jberryhill Sep 2016 #23
I was saying that I don't remember the dropping of gloves ALBliberal Sep 2016 #25
Buy a box jberryhill Sep 2016 #26
can we run this through an image stabilization routine?? n/t yodermon Sep 2016 #8
Wow, the guy in red never moves... OneGrassRoot Sep 2016 #9
My guess is Shankapotomus Sep 2016 #11
Actually... OneGrassRoot Sep 2016 #18
Maybe. Guns are the new sheets, after all. onehandle Sep 2016 #12
He is likely putting his foot on the gun then avoid it away for safety Lee-Lee Sep 2016 #13
The video evidence is clear philosslayer Sep 2016 #29
Is the theory that cops routinely carry untraceable "throw down" guns wherever they go, Nye Bevan Sep 2016 #15
maybe not all of them do, but you could see maybe some doing that Fast Walker 52 Sep 2016 #17
Seems to be. Marr Sep 2016 #21
yeah, it's fishy for sure, and I can see what you mean Fast Walker 52 Sep 2016 #16
I have watched this video about 10 times and even slowed things down and haven't seen Waldorf Sep 2016 #27
No question in my mind; the gun was planted CanonRay Sep 2016 #28
CNN has reported that "sources close to the investigation" lapucelle Sep 2016 #30

exboyfil

(17,863 posts)
1. Object is kind of visible at 1:17
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 03:19 PM
Sep 2016

and definitely visible at 1:22. Gunshots were at 1:08. This would have been a 9 to 14 second window to place a throw down.

You are right about him obscuring the gun going forward though. Between his foot placement and shadow you don't see the object again.

Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
2. Yeah, at 1:23 you can still see it
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 03:24 PM
Sep 2016

and then he purposely looks down for it and steps back and puts his left foot in front of it, blocking it from the camera's view.

As far as I'm concerned that's our main suspect right there.

He planted that gun and he thought she might of seen the plant or had it on video and tried to fucking hide it with his foot.

Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
5. I'm not talking about the gloves
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 03:34 PM
Sep 2016

which were actually dropped by the black officer.

That's not the story. The real story is what the fucking cop in red is doing.

If the gun is right under you why would you stand practically on top of evidence if you didn't plant it?

He's hiding the plant behind his left foot!!! And she got it on video!

That's the story!

JCMach1

(27,559 posts)
6. that's exactly what I am saying ... watch closely and the object moves like
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 03:36 PM
Sep 2016

a hard object dropped to the pavement.

Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
10. What time does that object bounce?
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 03:42 PM
Sep 2016

I see the glove going down and that doesn't bounce and that's long after the cop in red's left foot is in the position it will stay for the rest of the video.

JCMach1

(27,559 posts)
20. second object appx. 2:17 it is shaky so watch carefully
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 04:31 PM
Sep 2016

hard object (gun??? for sure not soft like a glove) drops and seems to semi-bounce like a metal object might. Imagine you drop a gun muzzle, or handle onto the pavement. It would semi-bounce then fall to one side. That's what I see.

I also stipulate... it might NOT be a gun. But, clearly not a light object.

ALBliberal

(2,342 posts)
4. What's the deal with the "pairs of gloves" being dropped?
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 03:30 PM
Sep 2016

As discussed on another DU thread? Is the purpose to explain lack of fingerprint evidence? Gloves in September seems strange.

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
7. All first responders are trained
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 03:37 PM
Sep 2016

to put on gloves before touching someone especially if that person is bleeding.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
14. Black nitrile gloves
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 04:04 PM
Sep 2016

The cop in the white t-shirt is messing with getting some on.

There's nothing strange about putting on rubber gloves at a crime scene.

ALBliberal

(2,342 posts)
19. Thanks. Interesting though that in most
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 04:27 PM
Sep 2016

If not all of the publicized shootings gloves didn't seem to be a factor in the videos.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
22. I'm not sure what you mean
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 05:12 PM
Sep 2016

Can you point to an example where someone is shot, laying on the ground, and responders are or are not wearing rubber gloves?

I don't think there are two many crime scene investigations where people don't wear gloves.

Here is a responder to the Michael Brown shooting:



Notice the shade of purple of the guy's hand who is touching the body?

Those are purple nitrile gloves.

The nitrile ones tend to come in purple, blue or black, and the latex ones are light tan. The latex ones aren't as favored as they used to be, since some people have latex allergies.

But they are pretty common.





ALBliberal

(2,342 posts)
24. Thanks I will clarify. This is the first time that I am aware of the dropping
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 05:21 PM
Sep 2016

Of gloves being discussed and being an issue in these shootings. I do understand now the necessity of police wearing gloves.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
23. Did you watch the Walter Scott shooting video?
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 05:19 PM
Sep 2016


I don't think that cop suffers from blue hand syndrome.

ALBliberal

(2,342 posts)
25. I was saying that I don't remember the dropping of gloves
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 05:23 PM
Sep 2016

Being such an issue before. Thank you I do understand the need for them to wear gloves. Blue hand syndrome indeed

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
26. Buy a box
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 05:34 PM
Sep 2016

Honestly, one of my favorite shop things for working on my bike or my car are those purple nitrile gloves. If you get a good fit, the "feel" is really nice, the grip is good, and you don't have to mess around with GoJo or brushing under your nails later.

The powderless ones (which don't have cornstarch or talc on the inside for slipping them on) are preferred for... not contaminating whatever with powder, but if your hands are at all sweaty, then you can easily rip them putting them on. Also, sometimes you get a bad one where a finger is welded shut.

I have no idea what is going on in this video, and it certainly bears a lot of looking at, but I really can't imagine too many cops who are going to search a bleeding person and/or body without putting on gloves and making sure they don't have rips or holes.

Even if it's a white guy:

Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
11. My guess is
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 03:47 PM
Sep 2016

he thought he was caught in the middle of the plant by the wife and she also tells him she's recording so he doesn't know whether to move and allow the gun to be seen and possibly have the plant exposed or just to act like it was the victim's gun.

OneGrassRoot

(22,920 posts)
18. Actually...
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 04:24 PM
Sep 2016

it's hard to do on a computer without enhancement tools, but it does look like there is a gun behind the officer in the red shirt just before he moves to the back to protect it; after that point he doesn't move his left leg, and supposedly that's what is done to protect evidence.


Go to 1:20

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
12. Maybe. Guns are the new sheets, after all.
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 03:50 PM
Sep 2016

Just the existence of guns in modern society kills African-Americans

None of us are happy about trigger happy cops, but gun culture is killing black people.

From the threat of open carry, which is all about keeping 'them' in their place. To the used gun market, which is about arming... just enough of 'them.'

Gun culture has a narrative. And it is not about self-defense, or hunting, or sport shooting.

Just the possibility of a gun will kill a black person. Guns are the new sheets.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
13. He is likely putting his foot on the gun then avoid it away for safety
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 03:58 PM
Sep 2016

Because when you have someone that just had a gun you don't know if they are still capable of reaching for it. A first move for safety would be step on it, then scoot it away out of easy reach of your suspect.

Crime scene safety 101. Don't leave a gun where a suspect, even an injured one, can grab it.

The conspiracy theory that in a few short seconds the officer produced a "throw down" gun (from where, uniforms are pretty full and there is nowhere to hide it) and planted it instantly without superb coordination and complete approval from everyone else there is absurd, and shows the lengths of cognitive dissonance some people will go to in order to not risk exposure to the idea that maybe the dude had a gun.

 

philosslayer

(3,076 posts)
29. The video evidence is clear
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 06:17 PM
Sep 2016

Don't let your lying eyes deceive you. We can see exactly what the police are up to in this video. Your attempt to defend them is admirable, but I'll believe what I see

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
15. Is the theory that cops routinely carry untraceable "throw down" guns wherever they go,
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 04:05 PM
Sep 2016

just so that they can plant them if necessary to cover their asses?

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
17. maybe not all of them do, but you could see maybe some doing that
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 04:09 PM
Sep 2016

if they've confiscated it illegally

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
21. Seems to be.
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 04:59 PM
Sep 2016

I'm amazed at how certain people are of this incendiary accusation, when I can't even see what they're talking about.

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
16. yeah, it's fishy for sure, and I can see what you mean
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 04:08 PM
Sep 2016

Unfortunately, nothing definitive.

The black object on the ground near the black officer are gloves? I thought it was the gun.

Waldorf

(654 posts)
27. I have watched this video about 10 times and even slowed things down and haven't seen
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 05:43 PM
Sep 2016

anything that people are seeing. I will await the investigation report (and probably the DOJ report).

lapucelle

(18,265 posts)
30. CNN has reported that "sources close to the investigation"
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 07:01 PM
Sep 2016

say that the victim's DNA and fingerprints were found on the gun.

I'm not sure if the source is reliable or if the report is true.

http://www.grandforksherald.com/news/4121855-report-loaded-gun-found-nc-had-fingerprints-matching-victim-family-releases-video



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Not sure, but looks to m...